Re: MQMs new challenge
I do not claim to speak for everyone here when I say this, but I get a feeling I may be correct in my assessment. The problem is not MQM per se. The problem is its’ head figure who has the indecency to call shots sitting abroad, and so blatantly call for attack on protestors whose demand is that of recounting votes.
But if the party sticks with him despite that lack of character, then the blot spreads from one person to the entire party. MQM has the potential to do good for the poor, and common man who’s a stranger in the city, but it needs to distance itself from its’ chief. Please do not be dishonest to yourself; integrity requires that you measure everyone with the same ethical standards.
The fact that most people affiliate MQM with violence is by no coincidence. Where there’s smoke; there’s bound to be a fire somewhere. Smokescreens might hide it for a while, but eventually it’s going to burn through.
I seek no ratification from you; I’m sure you have the ability to refute everything I’ve said. I’ve merely stated what I felt was the overall consensus among the people I’ve spoken to in terms of what has occurred post-elections.