I really think Imran Khan's words were used out of context, what "natural ally" meant in his speech was the basis of the party not ally because he agreed with what MQM actually carries out on streets.
Man u just trying to grab your left ear from your right hand from back side of your head thou u can grab it easily from easy way!!
Baat samjh ai?
ISLAMABAD: Minister for Interior A. Rehman Malik on Thursday said that difference of opinion is ingredient of politics and misunderstanding if any with MQM would be removed.
**Talking to media men, he said “difference of opinion is ingredient of politics as well as democracy. MQM is a separate and independent party and every miscommunication between PPP and MQM would be tackled”.
**
He said that he favors the efforts of MQM to approach to the people in other provinces and said that Altaf Hussain is a wise and seasoned politician and he always learned something from him.
Over the issue of seat-adjustment with MQM in AJK elections, he said that political parties talk with each other on various issues and if something has created misunderstanding with MQM, it would be removed.
Rehman Malik said the elections were postponed on various seats as the Chief Election Commissioner expressed some concerns over the security issue there. “I am in touch with my friends and issues will be settled soon,” he added.
He said that situation in Karachi is improving due to effective coordination among intelligence agencies. He urged the media to play its role to strengthen Pakistan and regretted over the attitude of those criticizing the institutions of the country.
Man u just trying to grab your left ear from your right hand from back side of your head thou u can grab it easily from easy way!!
Baat samjh ai?
you have no idea what you say and what you post, so I'll give you benefit of doubt on what "context" means, I don't like people who pull things from their behinds.
MQM has decided to leave Sindh, and National Govt (again). Ishrat ul Ibad has also resigned.
What more can be expected from MQM?? it sure is a Qalabazi movement.. Don't know why they always slip from their main agenda (though there haven't been any one specific agenda by them as it changes from time to time).
Agenda ?
There is no agenda with any one .
(Not only politicians, every one)
Money, more money ,
Money for power, Power for more money.
Chandah, Bhattah , Corruption,Cheating, Prostitution
Every way.
Mr genius then you shouldn't be asking questions when answers don't matter.
You just "denounced" mid term elections when Imran did it but called it a "cause of anarchy in the country" when MQM did it. Isn't it?
You are the only one fearing this anarchy because all of Pakistan's leading political parties, even the "internet party" PTI, don't consider the threat to PPP government as the threat to Pakistan itself and the cause of anarchy.
Now you can continue to espouse this laughable opinion but no one will take you or your opinion seriously.
But let's say that your fear of anarchy is well-founded. Now my question is what is the responsibility of the current government? Do you think everyone should give the government free hand to do whatever it wants? And then expect everyone to continue to support them?
What kind of "coalition government" is it?
You just "denounced" mid term elections when Imran did it but called it a "cause of anarchy in the country" when MQM did it. Isn't it?
Imran only "talked" about mid-term election while MQM actually quit government, see the difference or no?
You are the only one fearing this anarchy because all of Pakistan's leading political parties, even the "internet party" PTI, don't consider the threat to PPP government as the threat to Pakistan itself and the cause of anarchy.
Now you can continue to espouse this laughable opinion but no one will take you or your opinion seriously.
Anarchy didn't go to next level because the other lota party joined PPP so there, no you can keep laughing because MQM lost its value (whatever worth it was).
But let's say that your fear of anarchy is well-founded. Now my question is why do you criticize all parties of Pakistan for wanting it? If govt fall is equal to anarchy then what is the responsibility of the current government? Do you think everyone should give the government free hand to do whatever it wants? And then expect everyone to continue to support them?
What kind of "coalition government" is it?
Who wants to give "freehand" to government? If MQM is really "democratic" party then they should believe in "voting" process, when government tries to pass any bill which sounds like "freehand" MQM could've always opposed it.
There is no difference. Imran also wants mid term elections. And if mid term elections are the cause of anarchy then Imran also wants anarchy. http://www.onlinenews.com.pk/details.php?id=180998
Mid-term polls unavoidable: Imran[/h]KARACHI: The Chairman Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf (PTI) Imran Khan has said that the mid-term elections have become imperative because lame and crippled democracy has failed to resolve the peoples’ problems at all.
“People would be soon the part of our campaign remove government –save Pakistan”, he added.
MQM worthless? In your hatred of MQM you seem to not realize that if MQM was worthless then everyone in the country wouldn’t be talking about. Including Imran.
PMLQ joined the government BEFORE Muttahida had quit. This means that there was NO REASON to worry about government’s fall and (in your laughable opinion) “cause of anarchy”.
So there your MQM hatred is exposed once again.
MQM’s complain is that government did not listen to any of their demands. Everytime government relented a little only when MQM threatened to quit the coalition.
There is no difference. Imran also wants mid term elections. And if mid term elections are the cause of anarchy then Imran also wants anarchy.
I never agreed with Imran, is this too difficult to understand?
MQM worthless? In your hatred of MQM you seem to not realize that if MQM was worthless then everyone in the country wouldn't be talking about. Including Imran.
Please read my post again and tell me where I said MQM was "worth-less"? Happy reading.
PMLQ joined the government BEFORE Muttahida had quit. This means that there was NO REASON to worry about government's fall and (in your laughable opinion) "cause of anarchy".
So there your MQM hatred is exposed once again.
MQM's complain is that government did not listen to any of their demands. Everytime government relented a little only when MQM threatened to quit the coalition.
good you finally found out that PMLQ joined before MQM quit, its okay for ministers to join government and leave when they want, I guess the transitions are always smooth and no work actually stops during all this "waavela".
I never agreed with Imran, is this too difficult to understand?
But you did not create so much "waavela" with Imran as you did about "anarchy" as you did when MQM quit the government. You also were ok when MANY other political parties were demanding mid term elections.
sirf MQM par hi nazla girta he tum jese logon ka.
You need to admit that Imran also wants mid term elections. So his position is NO WAY different from MQM's.
Here you are proven false again, and your MQM dushmani exposed.
[quote]
its okay for ministers to join government and leave when they want, I guess the transitions are always smooth and no work actually stops during all this "waavela".
[/quote]
Those lotas joined the government only when PPP was worried about past threats from MQM.
But when they did join the government, there was no chance of govt falling. So why this "waavela" from you about "anarchy" and "Pakistan bachao"?
And if you are so concerned about this anarchy then why only blame MQM? What do you say about PPP's responsibility to keep the coalition and save the country from your imagined "anarchy"?
By the way, Captain. Since in your opinion the fall of government will cause "anarchy", can you show anyone else in the country saying this? Even anyone from PPP?