Mothers are more apathetic towards their children if they were CSDs

Re: Mothers are more apathetic towards their children if they were CSDs

If you actually read the article it talks about subconscious hormonal releases … something that is not in their sphere of intended reactions … But something that happens at a biological level.

Re: Mothers are more apathetic towards their children if they were CSDs

Yes, this is true … It is an incredibly small number … And this is the sort of criticism that studies like this deserve … But to accuse the study of saying something else is wrong too. If anything this study demands further study in this area …

Re: Mothers are more apathetic towards their children if they were CSDs

Home births are on the increase … Btw :slight_smile:

Re: Mothers are more apathetic towards their children if they were CSDs

Science studies are not designed to make people feel bad.

Re: Mothers are more apathetic towards their children if they were CSDs

Well it seems that what is natural and intended by nature is better for us, but where there are situations when intervention is required then our religion requires us to employ those too. I feel C-section should remain a medical procedure when the need arises and not a choice … I don’t hold it against people if they make that a choice … Who am I to judge people? All I think is that we should study the effects of every intervention that we do especially those that become alternatives to natural ways rather than necessary interventions for medical emergencies. It will equip the mothers more about making informed decisions. It has nothing to do with religion, my stance stems from the strong belief that we are in a well calibrated system and that Allah (SWT) does not put burdens on people and things that may seem unfair or harsh are actually deeply rooted to a larger Wisdom that we cannot always see.

Re: Mothers are more apathetic towards their children if they were CSDs

Ladies, listen to Psyah he seems to be speaking from experience.

Re: Mothers are more apathetic towards their children if they were CSDs

while on this topic, i’d come across some article not too recently but about the difference in beneficial bacteria in the GI tract and skin of babies who were delivered vaginally vs. C-sections, and the first bunch had “better” populations (with stronger immune system implications) coz they swallow a bunch of stuff from the mom on their way out.

and come on, just coz he or anyone else is male doesnt mean we can’t post about births. (we’ve taken part in at least one for sure).

Re: Mothers are more apathetic towards their children if they were CSDs

bravo!!!

Re: Mothers are more apathetic towards their children if they were CSDs

That is interesting too, first I heard of it. Also, prolactin hormone produced at labour stimulates milk production … So it seems labour itself is playing a huge role.

Re: Mothers are more apathetic towards their children if they were CSDs

So women who can’t go on labor on their own or suffer from high bp/GD, placental abruption, fetal distress should just take a hike and let the baby die in utero and risk their lives and die themselves coz God forbid they won’t be able to feed their baby since labor hasn’t come about!
What an extremely retarded notion! There are women who go through hours of labor to end up in c-secs as well as c-sec moms who have fed just fine.
Corelation does not imply causation!

Re: Mothers are more apathetic towards their children if they were CSDs

^women who die during child-labour are Shaheed and should think again before heading to C sec to save their life .. once in a lifetime chance :hmmm:

Re: Mothers are more apathetic towards their children if they were CSDs

^ I was convinced I was going to die on the c sec table when they took me in after hours of labor pain

Re: Mothers are more apathetic towards their children if they were CSDs

:k:

psyah bhai, you might just want to encourage the vb mothers more, i m just looking at the positive side of it, but it hurts.

Re: Mothers are more apathetic towards their children if they were CSDs

:hugz:

The article only took into account elective c-section decisions. Not emergency c-sections. I think.

Re: Mothers are more apathetic towards their children if they were CSDs

Peace raania

You yourself raise the notion, but then call it retarded …

Re: Mothers are more apathetic towards their children if they were CSDs

Childish behaviour prototype :nahi:

Re: Mothers are more apathetic towards their children if they were CSDs

I think both VD and CSD come with their own issues and where VD may be more painful CSD may be longer to recover from … I’m just amazed that there seem to be things that we try to make easier for ourselves but do not realise that we might be making another set of problems … Only when CSD is taken to be a choice, otherwise when it is necessary to do CSD then it has to be done.

Re: Mothers are more apathetic towards their children if they were CSDs

Agreed … The concern should be around elective CSD, rather than necessary CSDs.

Re: Mothers are more apathetic towards their children if they were CSDs

  1. What are those “set of problems”? As I already stated, what exactly is this “study” proving? Nothing as far as I’m concerned given all the flaws in it.

  2. I am a woman who has never been pregnant/given birth. You are a man thus you will never experience pregnancy/labor. Its ridiculous for people like us to pass any type of judgments on women who make choices to make the process of labor/birth easier on themselves. We have no idea what its like to be in that situation physically/psychologically, and neither one of us can really imagine the pain of giving birth.

  3. It is up to the pregnant woman and her doctor to decide when a CS is “necessary”. None of us have any right to to ask another woman to justify why she had a CS. For example…one of my close friends had a CS. When probed by nosy people…she simply told most people that she chose it b/c she was too scared of labor. I have no doubt people like you passed judgments on her for her choice. Her real reason? She was raped as a teenager. Thus, the idea of giving birth vaginally and having nurses/docs etc. touching her so intimately and not being in control of her body was traumatic to her. She was seeing a therapist throughout her entire pregnancy to try to get over this and finally, around her due date…after discussing her history/current mental state with her therapist AND OB…everyone agreed that a CS was best in her situation even though there was no physical medical justification for it. My point being that even in cases where we’re being told the CS was “elective”…we may not know the true reason behind it. So by reminding CS moms that they didn’t have a “normal delivery”…we may be doing more harm than good by making them feel that they’re somehow inferior to VD moms.

  4. Yes, this specific study was about elective CS. So what? What were the authors criteria for calling a CS “elective”? If I’m not mistaken…they’re not OBs. So is the “elective” designation given by the OBs of those 6 women OR did the authors of the study come up with a certain set of guidelines to decide which CS was elective?

In addition, they did their test 2-4 weeks after delivery. As I said already…whether its elective or not…it’s ridiculous to compare a woman who had major abdominal surgery to a VD mom who may not have had any complications. Without knowing the details of how easy or difficult those VD births were…and whether or not the CS moms had any issues recovering from the CS (ie. infection incision) and were taking strong pain meds…none of us know if the authors of the study were comparing apples to apples.