Mother caned in Bangladesh for talking to Hindu man

Does Islam and Sharia prevent married Muslim women talking to Hindus?


DHAKA (AFP) — A Muslim mother has been caned for talking to a Hindu man in Bangladesh, police said Saturday, prompting fresh concerns about a rise in cases of harsh treatment of women under strict Islamic law.

The punishment was carried out in a remote village in Muslim-majority Bangladesh on the orders of village elders, local police chief Enamul Monowar told AFP by telephone.

The village elders found Kamala Begum, 38, a mother of four children, guilty under Islamic sharia law of chatting with an unidentified Hindu man, Monowar said. Hindus make up around 10 percent of Bangladesh’s population.
“The villagers got bundles of 25 sticks and hit her four times on the back. They claimed it was a symbolic punishment. But she’s humiliated and has been in great mental pain,” Monowar said.

It was the third such reported case in two weeks in the country and stirred concern among women’s groups in Muslim-majority but officially secular Bangladesh about what they say is a rise in brutal treatment of women under locally applied Islamic laws.

“In the last few months, we have seen villagers invoking sharia to mete out barbaric punishments to women,” said Salma Ali, the head of rights group Bangladesh National Woman Lawyers Association.

Police have arrested one man and are looking for others who meted out the punishment to the woman in Shason in northeastern Bangladesh, Monowar said.

AFP: Mother caned in Bangladesh for talking to Hindu man

Earlier this month a man and a woman were caned for adultery after being convicted by a village court, police said.

Village courts are common in Bangladesh, particularly in more conservative rural areas, but are not recognised as legitimate courts of law.

Also this month, a 22-year-old unmarried Bangladeshi woman was caned 39 times and left fighting for her life after saying a neighbour was the father of her six-year-old son.

Re: Mother caned in Bangladesh for talking to Hindu man

No Islam doesn't stop us from talking to non-muslims otherwise I wouldn't be talking to you right now.

Re: Mother caned in Bangladesh for talking to Hindu man

Depends on what she was saying :faizy:

Anyhow, on a serious note, I think lack of education, Islamic education, is the cause of most barbaric acts that are carried out in the name of Islam, and the media…oh well, it’s their job to spread juice, eh?

Re: Mother caned in Bangladesh for talking to Hindu man

More fake news

Re: Mother caned in Bangladesh for talking to Hindu man

I wonder what religion they are practicing. It certainly isn't Islam.

How is this news fake?


really and with no condition on that?

Re: Mother caned in Bangladesh for talking to Hindu man

Instead of attacking the news as fake, it'd be lot better for yourself to look inside and see if there is an element within Islam, whether in theory or practice, that is causing this problem.

Hinduism took on and faced the issue of casteism which had intruded, head on and reformed and is better for it today. Today's Islam has many intrusions and will be the better for it to follow that approach as well

Re: Mother caned in Bangladesh for talking to Hindu man

^Oh really since when?
Low caste hindus burned, raped and paraded naked in Indian villages, is that what is taking the problem head on means.

Peace Rasheed

How is this true?

DHAKA (AFP) — A Muslim mother has been caned for talking to a Hindu man in Bangladesh, police said Saturday, prompting fresh concerns about a rise in cases of harsh treatment of women under strict Islamic law.

This article has an agenda ... a woman being caned has nothing in itself to do with Islamic law. For one there is no Islamic law practicesd in Bangladesh and secondly why would the beating of a woman put concerns about a rise in cases of women abuse under strict Islamic law, whatever that means? Then the stricter the Islamic law is followed the better the position is for the woman, but this article claims the opposite. There also may be a real concern for the rise in harsh treatment of women in Bangladesh but it is not to do with any form of appearance of Islamic law in Bangladesh. This is a half story and the other half has been pumped like steriods with anti-Islamic polemics: the political agenda of the journalist.

Re: Mother caned in Bangladesh for talking to Hindu man

I don't think it's fake, I remember some idiot in Barisal trying to ban all women from walking up and down a particular road nr a mosque (which had a post office and plenty of ppl needing to use it), he would wave his stick around and threaten to beat them lol. Some of my Dad's family live there so I know this stuff happens but it is v. rare as the country as a whole is quite secular and tolerant..

conditions of modest dress and modest talk apply to every muslim[women and women] while talking to [muslim and non muslim].......and here we are talking about a country Bangladesh with secular laws so keep this in mind too.

Re: Mother caned in Bangladesh for talking to Hindu man

deeba, are you bengali?

Re: Mother caned in Bangladesh for talking to Hindu man

Fact is different from what is appearing to us....... Infact the non muslims are trying to create a bad immage of Islam .... like Indians, Americans and many other ... huhh .... they planned to do these nonsences by appearing as muslims ....

If you have a little knowledge of the Islamic Shariya then you can easily understand that ... the conidions for practicing these rules are not ok .... but we are not familiar with the Islamic law .....

No one denies that such cases have happened/continue to happen in India but they are illegal and also outside of religion. The law takes its natural course in such cases.

Islam/Islamic states however do not seem to condemn/outlaw such barbaric customs and infact embrace it in the name of Sharia.

Thats the basic difference the earlier poster was trying to highlight.

@iftikhar_7 Don't worry, Muslims are giving a bad name to Islam themselves, you don't need non-Muslims to do this job, they are just going along with it.

This incident happened in a remote village in Bangladesh and the "judges" were village elders. You can call it fake news If it makes you sleep better at night. Fact is, these people are making such "judgments" pass as Islamic Law. Just how women are murdered in Pakistan by their own relatives and they don't get any jail time because it's supposed to be an Islamic practice called "Honour killing". (Where it's actually a part of pre-islamic backward desi culture) I guess all of that is fake also...

That's what I'm talking about. Instead of condoning it, they are corrupting Islam and its' law.

There is no strict or non strict Islamic Law in Bangladesh and Pakistan and thus the news is not entirely true. Got it?

But the village courts in those countries do claim to punish people under strict Islamic laws. The article didn't say anywhere the Bangladesh practices Islamic law, however it mentioned quite a few times that it happened in a remote village and the case was carried out in a village court, where they apparently practice "strict Islamic law".

Like I said, before. If believing this article is fake makes you sleep better at night, go for it...

So now you want me to believe that a bunch of dehatis are practising "strict Islamic Law"? T

here's no such thing as "Strict Islamic Law", there's Islamic Law (shariah) and I don't think that a bunch of villagers are the people who have any authority over the Sacred Law of Shariah.

Or are you willing to prove that those dehati judges are qualified to be the Islamic Scholars?


as-salamu 'alaykum respected sister

agreed upon, but what I wanted to highlight is that a Muslim male/female's interaction with opposite gender (whether Muslim or non-Muslim) is permissible only when it is necessary. It doesn't matter whether we're living in secular system or non-secular, because I believe the question of OP was regarding permissibility of such action at individual level. My apology if I overlooked at this point if you have already states or implied.

wa barak Allahu feekee


and how exactly did you reach that conclusion? I would also like you elaborate on these barbaric customs incorporated in Islam. Thanks

:hmmm: Then why does one never hear about “Islamic scholars” condemning or protesting these barbaric customs carried out by “jaahils” in the name of Islam ??