Doesn’t matter - They cant punish you if there is no evidence against you. They will punish you if you are guilty of some crime. It’s not the judge but the court and the legal system which punishes you. If the judges have commited some crime, they would be punished in the same court by the same legal system.
Did the God come to you and gave you a list of moral and immoral things ?
Exactly my point - that’s what I have been trying to tell you. I will follow if it makes sense and sounds logical. I wont If It sounds illogical and doesn’t make any sense and that doesn’t make me immoral and you very moral.
unilike you, I dont listen to homo talk yes and try preaching your morality talk in public and wait for your ticket
*Originally posted by Asif_k: *
Doesn’t matter - They cant punish you if there is no evidence against you. They will punish you if you are guilty of some crime. It’s not the judge but the court and the legal system which punishes you. If the judges have commited some crime, they would be punished in the same court by the same legal system.
You don’t get it, do you? you kept asking me if I were following the Book entirely all my life, and as soon as I no you made your decision that I can’t be judge. But when it comes to courts which punish for crimes you will accept the judgement from a judge who may have gotten away with his crimes because he didn’t get caught.
**Did the God come to you and gave you a list of moral and immoral things ? **
Quran.
Exactly my point - that’s what I have been trying to tell you. I will follow if it makes sense and sounds logical. I wont If It sounds illogical and doesn’t make any sense and that doesn’t make me immoral and you very moral.
Still, whats absolutely regarded as “immoral” in my reference book I will call it “immoral” I can’t change it.
**unilike you, I dont listen to homo talk yes and try preaching your morality talk in public and wait for your ticket **
Now listening to “homo talk” is bad to you … have to keep listening radio to get to the “traffic report”
No, it’s you who doesn’t get it. you want to compare you morality talk with Legal System. You are comparing yourself to a Judge .
Are you telling me that It’s a crime to mortage a house and i should be punished for that ?
Okay go issue a fatwa against me and punish me because I call the mortagage perfectly moral and interpret the holy book my own way. Is listening ‘homo talk’ moral ? Is using computers moral ? Is having 4 biwis and 14 bacche moral too??
*"In 1978, Shahbano, a 65-year-old Muslim woman, asked for financial “maintenance” from her husband, who had abandoned her for another woman. Shahbano’s demands ran counter to the Indian legal system, which in an effort to manage the volatile religious diversity of its citizenry, continues to recognize the distinct marriage and divorce laws of minority communities. In the case of Muslim law, this meant that Shahbano, who had no means to support herself, was due only three months’ maintenance for more than 40 years of marriage.
Seven years later.. ......Indian Supreme Court, which in a landmark decision overruled Muslim law and awarded Shahbano 25 rupees (60 cents) per month ongoing maintenance.
Yet the victory was short lived; the court’s ruling outraged several Muslim groups, and hundreds of thousands took to the streets in rallies. In the end, the Congress Party government, eager to appease minority voters and despite vociferous Hindu accusations of bowing to Muslim pressure, passed legislation that effectively negated the Supreme Court’s decision......" *
25 rupees per month....And the Mullahs like you thought it was immoral and not according to the Koran??
yes and try preaching your morality talk in public and wait for your ticket 
… have to keep listening radio to get to the “traffic report” 
