More barbarity from the Israelis

[hareem01]

@Raj_ind

U say that idols of hindu faith wont be destroyed in an Islamic state and hindus will be granted full religious freedom. Here is how an Islamic state would deal with idols.

Islam Question and Answer - Obligation to destroy idols

This is a site running by false salafis, most likely by Saudis themselves, and even the ahadith they posted do not suggest to destroy the idols of non muslims like Buddah’s statues.

@Raj_ind

Can a muslim be punished with capital punishment for killing a non muslim?

The hadith you posted does not give out any ruling and especially when there are incidents when Umar ibn Al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him), when a Muslim from the Bakr tribe killed a Christian of Hira, his verdict was that the killer be handed over to the heir of the deceased who could either accept blood money or kill him. The heir decided to take his revenge and the Muslim was killed.

And when a similar incident happened in the time of Umar ibn Abdul Aziz, the fate of the killer was the same. The unequivocal legal Islamic verdict was that the life of a Dhimmi was equal to the life of a Muslim and so was his blood money.Ali ibn Abi Talib (may Allah be pleased with him) spelled out this principle: *“*Whoever has accepted our protection (Dhimmi) his blood is like our blood and his blood money is like our blood money.” This was not a sound byte meant for the media. It was the law of the land.

@Raj_ind

How Islam deals with apostates?

There’s no ayah in Quran that states the worldly punishment for apostates but there are more than few verses that talk about the grand punishment for a muslim who changes his religion.

Ahadith give the details of punishment for an apostate only if he leaves the muslim community and wages war against them.

The blood of a Muslim who testifies that there is no god but Allah and that I am the Messenger of Allah is not lawful to shed unless he be one of three: a married person who commits adultery, in which case he is to be stoned to death; or someone who goes out waging war against Allah and His Messenger, in which case he is to be killed, crucified, or expelled from the land; or someone who killed another, in which case he is to be killed in retaliation. (Abu Dawud and `A’ishah)

@Raj_ind

Hareem, U dont live in shariyah abiding state, and further there is only one state which has the guts to implement shariyah rulings. So non muslims dont have any other mean to understand shariyah rather than look at the state where shariyah is being implemented practically. Those who enjoy the liberty of western nation or imitation of western nation’s policies sitting in so called muslim nation just would tell us that this is not real shariyah and shariyah is different. But their opinion isnt worth buying. I hope I can make U understand the whole thing.

Now plz have a look at Saudi Arabia who is alone following and implementing shariyah. A chiristian cant imagine of wearing a cross for fear of Mutawwas.

Saudi Arabia was home to many christians and jews before Islam took over it, there has to be many synogouges and churches. But we find none, what happened to them? Why no non muslim is a citizen of Saudi Arabia? because Islamic state kicked all of them out of their homes.

Even now, in presence of so many ahadith and presence of the only shariyah abiding state, if U guys still keeep on demanding proof that Islam doesnt limit the religious and political rights of non muslims, than I will say that U are not honest in debate.

Giving example of how Pakistan allows hindus to idol worship or how indonasia allows hindus to build temples or how turky allows jews to build syongogues is of no use, because these states are hypocrite muslim states and full of munafiqeen. U know very well the reason of my this comment.

Peace to U all.

There is no Shariah in Saudi. The SAudi rulers are secularists who have separated the sacred law from state affairs and they carry out strict punishments for common people just to control them.

Saudi is no different than other muslim states, infact they are worse than others.

Western countries are more suitable for Shariah than muslim countries because West has already adopted half of Islamic Law.