Missing Persons' case

re: Missing Persons' case

When I say this about Boots, Takht e Lahore , Intermediate pass intellectuals Rawalpindi and Aabparah ,
These terms are for them ,Their foolish conspiracies and Killing culture .

re: Missing Persons’ case

With reference to the Ch Nisar’s criticism of the army, Rahman Malik has apologized to the armed forces and asked Nisar to do the same…

Army criticism: Malik wants Chaudhry Nisar to apologise

By Web Desk
Published: February 5, 2012

http://i1.tribune.com.pk/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/332314-rehmanmalikpid-1328442394-812-640x480.jpg

Interior Minister says Chaudhry Nisar’s statements regarding the Army had hurt the whole nation. PHOTO: PID/FILE

****ISLAMABAD: **Interior Minister Rehman Malik pressed opposition leader Chaudhry Nisar to take back his statements regarding the Army, while speaking to the media on Sunday.
**
Malik said that if the people of the country start criticising the Army then there will be no difference between the people and other states, including India, which malign the institution.

“The states can fight as much as they want to, but the institutions should be kept aside,” he remarked.

**Stressing on Nisar to issue an apology, Malik said: “Chaudhry Nisar is like my elder brother… I hope he will apologise.”

He added that he wants to apologise to the Army, and everyone who was hurt by the statements, on behalf of the government and the parliament.

Nisar, during his speech in the National Assembly on Friday, had slammed the army and the security agencies, and had called on the prime minister to deal with them in a stern manner.
**
He raised the criticism in light of the recent extra-judicial killings, which included the murder of four GHQ attack suspects who were killed after being picked up from the Adiala jail.

re: Missing Persons’ case

Adiala missing prisoners’ case: After a heart-wrenching sight, SC wants answers Detain­ees show up in shabby condit­ion, court seeks writte­n explan­ations from ISI, MI chiefs.

By Azam Khan
Published: February 14, 2012

**ISLAMABAD: ****Everyone in the jam-packed courtroom number 1 was dumbfounded when authorities escorted them inside — each of the seven surviving detainees holding urine bags in their hands.
**
**Frail, weak, unable to talk and walk properly, the physical condition of the once missing prisoners – brought before the Supreme Court on Monday by the country’s top spy agencies – seemed abysmal.
**
**Four of his fellow detainees have already died in custody.
**
As the prisoners appeared before Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry – more than a year and a half after being picked up – he ordered a full medical examination. The Inter-Services Intelligence Agency (ISI) and Military Intelligence (MI) last month handed over the men to the custody of the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) government, after the Supreme Court took up the case.

“These people have been languishing in torture cells for over one and a half years,” Advocate Tariq Asad told the court, adding that, during confinement, the prisoners were not exposed to sunlight which deteriorated their health.

**Resuming the Adiala missing prisoners’ case, the apex court sought written explanations from the ISI and MI chiefs, Judge Advocate General (JAG) and K-P Chief Secretary Ghulam Dastagir Khan regarding the details about the prisoners and why they were not presented on the court’s earlier order.
**
Six-year-old son of prisoner Mazharul Haq hysterically sobbed upon seeing his father after almost two years.

“I have severe pain in my chest, my shoulders are itching. I am still shocked and unwell,” another detainee told AFP.

Meanwhile, the court told the K-P chief secretary to submit a comprehensive report entailing the details of the detention and a medical board report of the detainees within four days, while the JAG, MI and ISI were told to submit their reports on March 1.

**The court directed the ISI and MI chiefs to satisfy the court as to how they had held the 11 prisoners, what sort of trial was conducted, how they dealt with them and why their health conditions were deteriorating.
**
**“My son was kept in Parachinar in an open room where temperatures were below zero degrees,” one of the detainees’ mothers told The Express Tribune.
**
The chief justice then inquired about the prisoners and asked where they were before January 26. K-P chief secretary replied he did not have any knowledge regarding the whereabouts of the prisoners.

The chief justice criticised his statement and said, “A provincial chief secretary should be aware of everything that happens in the province.”

“A medical board shall be constituted to examine their health.”

Counsel of the prisoners Advocate Asad informed the court that three out of the seven prisoners were suffering from kidney failure, while the rest had been diagnosed with other chronic diseases.

Defence of Human Rights Chairperson Amina Janjua prayed to the court to order the release of all the missing persons currently detained in the country’s jails. Meanwhile, the court ordered that prisoners will now remain under provincial administration and not the ISI or MI.

The three-member bench, headed by the chief justice, had served notices to the ISI and MI chiefs on January 25 to explain the circumstances behind the deaths of the four prisoners.

The 11 accused had been facing a court martial under the Army Act on charges of attacking General Pervez Musharraf, the General Headquarters and ISI’s Hamza Camp base. They were picked up from the Adiala Jail by intelligence agencies after they had been acquitted of the charges by the court.

Four of the 11 detainees died in the custody of the ISI and MI, according to one of the detainees.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 14[SUP]th[/SUP], 2012.

re: Missing Persons' case

There is no proof that they were terrorist, even if they were even then it is not the treatment they should be getting, where are human rights champions?

Different treatment for Raymond davis , some one who killed a pakistani on pakistans soil, :(
*
asfal us safileen *

I have kid of similar age, have seen this kid as used to live in the same neighbourhood.Cant stop my tears. :(

re: Missing Persons' case

I was reading another report, that the previous case for these detainees was shelved almost a year ago and SC asked the military to launch court martial against them. But even that was not conducted by the army, and still the ISI and MI kept them in confinement. I wonder what our agencies have been doing with their detainees, it seems to be far worse than guantanomo bay! All of these people had urine bags when they arrived in SC, as far as Balochis are concerned (they dont matter) thats why they are killed like animals and their mutilated bodies thrown away in isolated places. The way our army is acting is really disgusting and its no different than the conduct of the terrorists they are fighting against, the dead bodies thrown by the military have burns, broken ribs, body parts cut out, and multiple bullet wounds.

re: Missing Persons' case

Very true, for balochis no one is raising his voice.

Same is the plight of Masood janjua and others.There was a news that Mullah Ubaid ullah akhund ex-taliban minister was killed/Died in karachi jail.

Still we are hope full that inshallah things will improve some day, this is how spiritual buzurgs are telling.

Let us see how events unfold in next 6 months.

re: Missing Persons’ case

Civilians surrender their authority meekly Backgrounder
[FONT=Georgia, ‘Times New Roman’, Times, serif]

**ISLAMABAD: The hearing of the ISI-held prisoners’ case by the Supreme Court has highlighted how easily, quickly and frequently the civilian administration surrenders its power to the army and intelligence agencies without the slightest resistance.
**
**On paper, a lot of power is vested with the civilian offices but, in reality, it is exercised by the military and the buck is passed on to the judiciary for being soft on the questions relating to the accountability of armed forces/agencies.
**
This point came under sharp focus when the three-member bench headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry asked the chief secretary of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (KP)/Fata where the prisoners were kept before their shifting to the FC-run internment centre in Parachinar.

**Ghulam Dastgir, the CS, who earlier claimed very proudly that the KP and Fata were under his administrative control, had no answer to the question. He instead feigned ignorance when asked who handed over the detainees on January 26, for shifting to the internment centre.
**
**Upon his display of sheepish attitude, the court directed him to submit his reply on the next hearing, as the learned bench was curious to know who kept the prisoners in custody before that time. “You are the administrative head of KP and Fata. The army can’t move in those areas without your consent, however, you don’t know what is happening there,” remarked the Chief Justice.
**
Dastgir is not the first sorry example in this case. Imtiaz Ahmad, the DSP (City), Peshawar, confronted a similar question during Friday’s hearing. The Lady Reading Hospital, where the four ailing detainees were kept, falls under his jurisdiction. Asked whether he knew the detainees were hospitalised there, as he is responsible for that area, he feigned ignorance too.

**The situation is relatively better in the Punjab. Its chief secretary Nasir Khosa’s statement before the court on the abduction of these 11 prisoners from the Adiala Jail on May 29, 2010, was instrumental in forcing the ISI to confess that it conducted the operation, an admission that was avoided before.
**
**Recently, an effort by the agencies to forcibly take away a detained accused, Saleem Masih (a sweeper in army unit) from the Lahore Police custody, was foiled only due to the brave stand taken by the authorities.
**
**A sub-inspector, Javed Iqbal, who resisted this abduction by the agencies, was also taken away, thrashed and then left. This incident resulted in an FIR against 50 army personnel, followed by the handing over to police of the taken-away accused.
**
Even before that, a terrorist accused in the case of attacks on Ahmedi community’s worship places, was abducted by the agencies and his family moved the court. The police had to admit whom he was handed over.

**The civilian administration, right from the political government down to bureaucracy, doesn’t assert its power and looks towards the judiciary in every case, say close observers of the situation.
**
**Already, several institutions have gone under the army’s control. The latest example in this respect is the National University of Modern Languages (NUML) that was under civilian control. However, the army chief used to be the Chairman of its Board of Governor, a position that should have been held either by the president of Pakistan or his nominee. As the legal anomalies started making headlines, the PPP government issued an ordinance that followed legislation through parliament legally surrendering its control to the army.
**
**The National Logistics Cell (NLC) is under the army’s control but technically this civilian department falls under the Planning Division’s jurisdiction. While the army handles it functioning and budgetary affairs, it is the secretary planning who has to appear before the Public Accounts Committee to answer on behalf of the NLC as its Chief Accounting Officer.
**
**The Frontier Constabulary in KP/Balochistan as well as Rangers in Punjab/Sindh are civilian arms under interior ministry’s control, but they are headed and manned by army officials.
**
The position of DG Military Lands and Cantonments is a civilian post, but a serving major general runs its directorate. The slot of secretary defence is a civilian post, but it mostly goes to retired generals barring a few exceptions.

**The situation is not different in the ISI either. Technically, it falls under direct administrative control of the prime minister, but he doesn’t know about its functions as the DG ISI, a serving general, is answerable to the army chief.
**
All attached/autonomous departments have their powers defined in the government’s rules of business book. How the inter-departmental interaction should take place and their jurisdiction has been mentioned in that book. It mentions that the Intelligence Bureau is under the administrative control of the Cabinet Division but there is no mention of the word ‘ISI’, let alone defining its functions and scope.

re: Missing Persons’ case

Govt complicit in missing persons’ abduction, persecution

ISLAMABAD: **A report of the Judicial Commission on Missing Persons is yet another indictment of the police and the government. The former helped intelligence agencies in abductions and the later neither struggled for their recovery nor implemented the commission’s recommendations to arrest this trend.

The FC in Balochistan that also faces the allegations of enforced disappearances falls under the direct control of the provincial government. Nevertheless, Chief Minister Aslam Raisani was one of those who submitted a list of 831 missing persons to the commission for their recovery instead of taking action himself.

Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani’s government, that was asked to evolve a mechanism between the police and intelligence agencies in addition to conducting legislation granting arrest/detention powers to the army and agencies for a limited period, has also failed to honour its recommendations.

**The recommendation of setting up a Commissionerate to looking after the complaints of disappearance cases has also been disregarded by the government. The government’s unwillingness to resolve this grave issue affecting hundreds of families and inciting anger to a dangerous level is evident from the fact that the report has not yet been made public, let alone honouring recommendations.

From March to November 2010 only, the period that the commission spent conducting fact-finding, it received yet another 203 fresh cases of missing persons meaning thereby 25 cases per month.

Although the agencies’ role in abduction cases is already condemned, the commission has found how the police partnered with the shadowy forces in this crime, right from helping in abductions down to committing intellectual dishonesty through faking FIRs.

Other than the lukewarm cooperation of the agencies and their stereotypical denial to allegations, the report has also noted with concern that the police chief and home secretary of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, one of the most affected province, refused to appear once before the commission.

About police, the commission notes that in many cases of enforced disappearances, the officers of DIG/SSP level were “aware of the identity of the person apprehended and kept under custody by the intelligence agencies.” However, they avoided “disclosing it before the courts or the commission.”

Also, the report says, the police officers committed “intellectual dishonesty by registering fake FIRs against the persons who are picked up by the intelligence agencies and handed over to the police after a long time.”

When the courts set such people free on non-production of sufficient evidence, a false propaganda is made that the courts are acquitting the culprits, said the report. The case of one Abdul Khaliq Awan, the report explains, who went missing from Rawalpindi, was shown as having been arrested in a case instituted in Mianwali. “It was such a weak and fabricated case that the relevant court acquitted him at the very first hearing.”

In view of the foregoing, the commission recommended the chief secretaries of all provinces and the chief commissioner Islamabad to issue directives to the police establishment asking them to refrain from illegal practices, yet no action has been taken in this regard.

As for the role of agencies in enforced disappearances is concerned, the commission report said affected families asserted on oath/affidavits the involvement of the agencies, however, the agencies would deny in many cases.

In one case of Ali Asghar Bangalzai, picked up in October 2001 from Quetta, the commission said that JUI-F leader Hafiz Hussain Ahmad and others recoded on oath they met ISI Brig Siddique who admitted having held Ali Asghar, promised release but it was never done.

Likewise, in case of Attiqur Rehman, a scientific officer of Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission who was picked up in June 2004, the day the wedding was to take place of this sole son of the parents, the investigation officers of the police concluded he was abducted by the agencies. The police also recorded this before the Supreme Court, yet neither any admission by the agencies nor recovery made.

The report said that the agencies’ cooperation in general with the commission remained lukewarm and “not up to our expectations”, though they helped in tracing some persons.

A number of instances have also been made where the army-led agencies first denied the custody of persons, however admitting later on that the persons under question are facing Field General Court Martial. There were as many as 12 individuals whose custody was acknowledged in this respect.

Describing the ugly apprehending tactics, the report said the “uncivilised methods were adopted by the police and agencies’ personnel.” The arrests from the residence of the victims were usually made, the report explain, “in the dead of night by scaling the outer walls of the house, rapping at the door, overpowering the wanted person, tying his hands behind his back with ropes, blindfolding him or putting his shirt over his face and pushing him into the waiting vehicles.”

In eight-month time, the commission dealt with 392 cases of missing persons, 203 fresh cases registered during that period were also included. Through investigations and police/agencies help, 134 persons could be traced; 96 deleted being not cases in the category of enforced disappearance; 24 were not considered due to incomplete particulars.

The list of missing persons it received from Amina Masood Janjua, chief minister Balochistan and Baloch Liberation United Front, contained 2,390 cases that after verification and removing duplication, went down to 1,601.

In its recommendations, the commission said the agencies should be restrained from arbitrary arrests/detention; a mechanism be evolved for information sharing between agencies/police and appropriate legislation for providing specific arrest/detention power to army/agencies for a limited period. It also recommended setting up of a commission headed by a sitting/retired high court judge to deal with missing persons cases.

Certain recommendations on procedural level were also forwarded like the immediate formation of Joint Investigation Team on missing person cases; the establishment of task forces on provincial level and others.

re: Missing Persons’ case

Govt complicit in missing persons’ abduction, persecution

ISLAMABAD: **A report of the Judicial Commission on Missing Persons is yet another indictment of the police and the government. The former helped intelligence agencies in abductions and the later neither struggled for their recovery nor implemented the commission’s recommendations to arrest this trend.

The FC in Balochistan that also faces the allegations of enforced disappearances falls under the direct control of the provincial government. Nevertheless, Chief Minister Aslam Raisani was one of those who submitted a list of 831 missing persons to the commission for their recovery instead of taking action himself.

Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani’s government, that was asked to evolve a mechanism between the police and intelligence agencies in addition to conducting legislation granting arrest/detention powers to the army and agencies for a limited period, has also failed to honour its recommendations.

The recommendation of setting up a Commissionerate to looking after the complaints of disappearance cases has also been disregarded by the government. The government’s unwillingness to resolve this grave issue affecting hundreds of families and inciting anger to a dangerous level is evident from the fact that the report has not yet been made public, let alone honouring recommendations.

From March to November 2010 only, the period that the commission spent conducting fact-finding, it received yet another 203 fresh cases of missing persons meaning thereby 25 cases per month.

Although the agencies’ role in abduction cases is already condemned, the commission has found how the police partnered with the shadowy forces in this crime, right from helping in abductions down to committing intellectual dishonesty through faking FIRs.

**Other than the lukewarm cooperation of the agencies and their stereotypical denial to allegations, the report has also noted with concern that the police chief and home secretary of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, one of the most affected province, refused to appear once before the commission.

About police, the commission notes that in many cases of enforced disappearances, the officers of DIG/SSP level were “aware of the identity of the person apprehended and kept under custody by the intelligence agencies.” However, they avoided “disclosing it before the courts or the commission.”

**Also, the report says, the police officers committed “intellectual dishonesty by registering fake FIRs against the persons who are picked up by the intelligence agencies and handed over to the police after a long time.”
**
**When the courts set such people free on non-production of sufficient evidence, a false propaganda is made that the courts are acquitting the culprits, said the report. The case of one Abdul Khaliq Awan, the report explains, who went missing from Rawalpindi, was shown as having been arrested in a case instituted in Mianwali. “It was such a weak and fabricated case that the relevant court acquitted him at the very first hearing.”
**
In view of the foregoing, the commission recommended the chief secretaries of all provinces and the chief commissioner Islamabad to issue directives to the police establishment asking them to refrain from illegal practices, yet no action has been taken in this regard.

As for the role of agencies in enforced disappearances is concerned, the commission report said affected families asserted on oath/affidavits the involvement of the agencies, however, the agencies would deny in many cases.

In one case of Ali Asghar Bangalzai, picked up in October 2001 from Quetta, the commission said that JUI-F leader Hafiz Hussain Ahmad and others recoded on oath they met ISI Brig Siddique who admitted having held Ali Asghar, promised release but it was never done.

Likewise, in case of Attiqur Rehman, a scientific officer of Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission who was picked up in June 2004, the day the wedding was to take place of this sole son of the parents, the investigation officers of the police concluded he was abducted by the agencies. The police also recorded this before the Supreme Court, yet neither any admission by the agencies nor recovery made.

The report said that the agencies’ cooperation in general with the commission remained lukewarm and “not up to our expectations”, though they helped in tracing some persons.

A number of instances have also been made where the army-led agencies first denied the custody of persons, however admitting later on that the persons under question are facing Field General Court Martial. There were as many as 12 individuals whose custody was acknowledged in this respect.

Describing the ugly apprehending tactics, the report said the “uncivilised methods were adopted by the police and agencies’ personnel.” The arrests from the residence of the victims were usually made, the report explain, “in the dead of night by scaling the outer walls of the house, rapping at the door, overpowering the wanted person, tying his hands behind his back with ropes, blindfolding him or putting his shirt over his face and pushing him into the waiting vehicles.”

In eight-month time, the commission dealt with 392 cases of missing persons, 203 fresh cases registered during that period were also included. Through investigations and police/agencies help, 134 persons could be traced; 96 deleted being not cases in the category of enforced disappearance; 24 were not considered due to incomplete particulars.

The list of missing persons it received from Amina Masood Janjua, chief minister Balochistan and Baloch Liberation United Front, contained 2,390 cases that after verification and removing duplication, went down to 1,601.

In its recommendations, the commission said the agencies should be restrained from arbitrary arrests/detention; a mechanism be evolved for information sharing between agencies/police and appropriate legislation for providing specific arrest/detention power to army/agencies for a limited period. It also recommended setting up of a commission headed by a sitting/retired high court judge to deal with missing persons cases.

Certain recommendations on procedural level were also forwarded like the immediate formation of Joint Investigation Team on missing person cases; the establishment of task forces on provincial level and others.

re: Missing Persons’ case

lol this is funny…

suddenly Nawaz Sharif has converted into a savior/champion of the missing persons…

PML-N will continue jihad until missing persons are recovered: Sharif****ISLAMABAD: **On the third day of the protest camp set up by the families of the missing persons in front of the Parliament House, Pakistan Muslim League – Nawaz (PML-N) came to console them. “We [PML-N] will continue this jihad until they [missing persons] are recovered,” said party chief Nawaz Sharif.

**
Sharif said that his party will raise its voice against the issue. “This cannot be tolerated. All of this is happening under the nose of the democratic government.”

Sharif said, “We will move a resolution in the National Assembly to back the missing persons case.” He said that those who will oppose the resolution will be exposed in front of everyone.

“We cannot see this happening to the families of over 1,000 missing persons from across the country,” said Sharif. “Their family members have been picked up by unknown people, they don’t know of their whereabouts and their condition.”

**He also extended his party’s support to the missing persons in Balochistan. “I want to assure my brothers in Balochistan that we will raise our voice for them as well. We do not discriminate between provinces,” said Sharif.

**
“Our heads are hanging in shame because of the society that we live in, who are these people going to go to?”questioned Sharif “I ask, why the government doesn’t inquire about this?”

PML-N will continue jihad until missing persons are recovered: Sharif

re: Missing Persons’ case

Watch it
Capital Talk – 15 February 2012Kh.Saad Rafiq was worth listening.
b) Justice (Rtd) Javaid Iqbal was just doing PR. He knows that he can’t do any thing. Enjoying life on Baluchistan quota .

re: Missing Persons’ case

Agencies fail to provide any

Agencies fail to provide any

[Umar Cheema](The News International: Latest News Breaking, World, Entertainment, Royal News Cheema)
Sunday, February 19, 2012

ISLAMABAD: As the killing of four detainees in the intelligence agencies custody and plight of the remaining seven have caught the attention of the Supreme Court, also sparking debate in the media, a story ran through the official news agency (APP) has tried to establish the captives were found guilty of committing attacks on ISI bus near Hamza Camp, other installations, yet being portrayed innocent.

Going by the report published on Saturday, one assumes the charges are of a grave nature. However, intriguingly neither the evidences in this respect were shared with the police and prosecution for presenting before the court of law that acquitted them due to lack of evidence nor were used for trying the accused through Army Act as it hasn’t been done so far, a fact admitted by ISI-MI lawyer, Raja Irshad Ahmad. Regardless the fact that the captives under question were involved in terrorism cases or not, lack of coordination between the army/agencies and the police has resulted in acquittal of the accused in many terrorism-related cases.

Right from bus attack in front of Hamza Camp down to the killing of Lt Gen Mushtaq Baig and others, lack of cooperation marred the prosecution of cases resulting in the acquittal of the accused. In the latter case, even an investigation by Punjab’s Prosecution Department found that army/agencies not only remained at distance throughout the case, even the FIRs were registered by the police itself, instead of the army. The report also found police faking FIRs at the behest of security establishment from backdates; the captives were held in the agencies’ custody and when handed to the police, it was done without sharing evidences collected during the course of one-year long detention.

As far as the attack on bus near Hamza Camp is concerned, the police were kept away from the investigation and no evidence was shared. The FIR was registered in some backdate, and none from the Army appeared as a witness, though four officials initially showed readiness but two backed out when approached by police for the purpose and the remaining two refused court appearance.

No inquiry was ordered to determine what caused the acquittal of the Hamza Camp attack accused though a meeting was held in the Regional Police Officer’s office in April to examine the reasons. Top officials of the Prosecution department, representatives of intelligence agencies and police bosses were in attendance, insiders of that meeting told The News. According to the officials privy to the meeting, the intelligence sleuths accused the police and prosecution of badly handling the case that led to the acquittal of the accused. The police instead put the blame on intelligence agencies. Officials from the New Town Police Station in whose jurisdiction the incident occurred told the meeting that they were kept out of the loop. The accused subsequently secured acquittal from the Anti-Terrorism Court for want of evidence.

An explosives-laden van had hit a bus packed with security personnel at the gate of Hamza Camp (old Ojhri Camp) near Faizabad, killing 17 persons and injuring 35 others, on the morning of November 24, 2007. As the incident occurred and police reached the spot, even the then SSP (Operation) Yasin Farooq was not allowed to visit the crime scene that was hosed down within hours, the relevant officials told the meeting in the presence of intelligence sleuths. The wreckage of vehicle was removed and the police were told to leave the place.

The intelligence officials had an application registered with the police station about the incident, only four months after the incident. As a result, a Joint Interrogation Team was formed four months later but with no work as the suspects remained in the exclusive custody of intelligence personnel. The police were directed to leave blank an FIR to be filled later and it was done nine months after the incident when the six accused were handed over to the police.

Narrating how the ‘arrest by police’ of the accused was flashed in the media, an official said that the police learnt through TV tickers about the arrest of some suspects who were initially locked up in the Civil Lines Police Station. The New Town Police Station was later ordered to take them in custody and register their arrest. The media was told explosives jackets had been recovered from them as the seven suspects were found sitting together. As the issue emerged how to link them with Hamza Camp attack, the agencies offered to present their four officials as witnesses, who would testify that they had seen them running from the scene. As the police approached the would-be witnesses working in Hamza Camp, two of them flatly refused while the other two showed willingness. But one of them backed out when asked to accompany for identity parade and the other refused to appear in the court as a prosecution witness.

As nine months had already passed, the police now had the accused but neither the witnesses nor the agencies shared their findings, the meeting was told. The police even didn’t have the medico-legal reports of those killed and injured in the incident. These reports were also got prepared in the backdate from the Combined Military Hospital (CMH), the police officials told the meeting.

According to the police, they sent many reminders to the agencies for handing over the evidence. Finally, a letter was sent issuing a warning that non-provision of evidence would spoil the case for which the police could not be blamed. Again, no evidence was shared. The end result was the acquittal of the accused. This entire episode was reported in The News on July 8,2008. The ISPR was contacted with a list of questions for version that was never answered. As for the investigation into suicide attack on surgeon Lt. Gen Mushtaq Baig (Feb. 24, 2008) and the attack on bus of trainees of Armed Forces Post-Graduate Medical Institute (AFPGMI) (Feb. 4, 2008) is concerned, the faults in investigation process and subsequent fate were not different either. After the acquittal of the accused in these cases, Punjab’s Prosecution Department investigated into the reasons behind it. The inquiry said the army “neither assisted nor showed any interest in the trial of the accused.” The intelligence agencies were accused of over-stepping their mandate and also of not sharing information with the police, as the accused remained in their custody for a year though they don’t have any legal power to keep any person in detention. “The role of the complainant department (army) and the investigation agencies was deplorable,” said an inquiry report published by The News on July 7, 2010. Although the report also blamed the police and prosecution for poor performance, the army and intelligence agencies were to face major blame.

In both cases, FIRs were registered by the police through its own officials, and in the backdates when the accused were handed over by the intelligence agencies after one-year detention. The Army neither got registered the FIRs nor its officials volunteered to stand in witness box and this job too was done by the police. No one from the army represented the department in the court. “No one from any agency facilitated nor any liaison was made from any person to pursue the prosecution in the court of law.”

The report proposed action against all those responsible for negligence, no matter which department they belonged to. The action was taken against the police and prosecution officials whose role was found negligent, it remains to be known whether or not any head rolled in the army/agencies for failing in this respect. The ISPR then didn’t offer any comment to a list of 11 questions sent by The News for version. A reading of 52-page inquiry report and background discussions with officials in Lahore and Rawalpindi reveals how the law is over-stepped in the absence of any strict mechanism and the suspected terrorists manage to secure release due to internal conflicts of the department and distortion of evidence.

“Neither the complainants (army officials) appeared nor have any contact with them (police) nor any representative of department (army) ever assisted them (police) or showed any interest in the trial of the accused,” said the inquiry report quoting the statement of a police official, ASI Bostan Khan of R. A. Bazaar Police Station, who was deputed as inquiry officer. The report says: “They (army) remained aloof throughout, from the day one of the charge sheet to the accused till the conclusion of the trial.” According to the report, no police official was exclusively deputed for investigation of these two high profile cases as Bostan Khan, the investigation officer, was tasked to “pursue all the criminal cases in the courts.” The report said: “The concerned agencies didn’t exhibit any interest in the follow-up of the cases regarding prosecution…The role of the complainant department (army) and the investigation agencies was deplorable.” Nine accused, believed to have carried out the two attacks, were picked up, seven without any evidence. “Without an iota of evidence seven accused were challaned out of nine,” the report said, and the remaining two were challaned on the statements of the police officials “whose statements were recorded after a lapse of one year.” The police officials told The News the accused were handed over to them after one year, the FIRs number 75 and 114 from February diary, were reserved to be filled on the receipt of the accused and hence it was done in backdate a year later. As none from the army was ready to become witness, two police officials were listed as witnesses.

The inquiry report while confirming that the accused remained in the custody of the intelligence agencies, has also accused the spy officials of not sharing any finding with the police, only handing them the accused for trial. “It is a fact that the accused remained under probe with the agencies prior to the arrest (by police), but no positive information was passed onto the local police and thus the role played by the agencies couldn’t be availed to probe the guilt of the accused,” said the inquiry report furnished by district public prosecutor of Rawalpindi, Malik Asghar.

According to police officials, no technical evidence was handed over to police like forensics, Nadra record, mobile record, findings of polygraphic machines. They say acquiring such things is not possible without excellent personal relations with the intelligence officials as it is done only through the sweet will of the keepers of such record and there is no legal force for pressuring them. The police even don’t have free access to Nadra record as they pay Rs25 for verification of a computerised record, they say.

There is no provision in law empowering the intelligence agencies to detain any accused or keep him in custody. In case of suspicion, it can be done by keeping them in police custody and after the passage of 24-hour, the court permission is required for remand, say the police and prosecution officials.

The report besides questioning the role of Joint Interrogation Team (JIT), has also raised alarms about the agencies’ overstepping of their mandate. The JIT was headed by the then CPO, Saud Aziz and had representatives from all the agencies, the report said. It further adds: “It is a matter of great concern that no one from the members of JIT bothered to record their comments or have even meeting for this purpose. Surprisingly, the investigation was conducted by the persons who were neither vested with the powers nor were members of the JIT, hence they were unauthorised, and were incompetent to investigate and finalise the investigation.” The report further notes: “It is time to think about the behaviour of all concerned, their non-cooperative attitude and to take action against the negligent officers in such high-profile case.”

Apart from police, the report said, the prosecutor concerned was also not provided any assistance from the department concerned.” At the same time, the report has questioned the role of the prosecutor, saying it was his responsibility “to check and analyse all the flaws and defects of the investigation and that if it was not found fit for submission, he should not have forwarded it against the accused persons in the court of law.”

re: Missing Persons’ case

’اب میں اپنا سر بچا کر بھیس بدل کر رپورٹنگ کر رہا ہوں اور کرتا رہوں گا۔ برائے مہربانی میرا یہ میسیج ڈیلیٹ مت کیجیے گا اور ریکارڈ پر رکھنا اگر میں مارا جاؤں تو۔‘ یہ الفاظ ہیں اس اخباری اور ٹی وی رپورٹر کے جس نے ایک گمشدہ شخص کے متعلق رپوٹنگ کی اور اب وہ بھاگتی ریل کے پیچھے ہے۔
گزشتہ منگل کو پاکستان کے صوبہ سندھ کے شہر میرپور خاص کے قریب میرپور خاص - عمر کوٹ روڈ پر ایک شخص شدید زخمی حالت میں بے ہوش ملا تھا۔ اس شخص کے دونوں جبڑے ٹوٹے ہوئے تھے جبکہ ایک جبڑے پر پلاسٹر بھی چڑھا ہوا تھا۔ اس شخص کا نام بشیر آریسر ہے۔

بشیر آریسر ان گمشدہ سندھی قوم پرستوں میں سے ایک ہے جن کی آزادی کے لیے ان کے اہلِ خانہ یا لواحقین سپریم کورٹ کے سامنے ان کی رہائي کی لیے احتجاجی کیمپ لگاکر مظاہرے کر رہے تھے۔ لیکن جس وقت بشیر آریسر کے گھر والے اسلام آباد میں مظاہرے کر رہے تھے انہیں منگل کی رات بتایا گیا کہ کئي ماہ قبل مبینہ طور پر انٹیلیجنس ایجنسیوں کے ہاتھوں گرفتار ہوکر لاپتہ ہونے والا بشیر آریسر انتہائي بری اور زخمی حالت میں پایا گیا ہے۔
بشیر آریسر جس شام ہاتھ آیا اسی رات اس کے تشدد شدہ زخمی جسم کے ساتھ برآمد گی کی خبریں اور فوٹیج اور فوٹوز سندھی ٹیلی ویژن نیوز نیٹ ورک کے ٹی این اور اخبار ’کاوش‘ پر نشر اور شائع ہوئے۔
لیکن کاوش اور کے ٹی این کے جس نمائندے نے یہ خبریں اور فوٹیج دیے اسکے خلاف مبینہ طور پر بقول اسکے ایجنیسوں نے کیا سلوک کیا ہوا وہ کاوش اور کے ٹی این کے اس نمائندے شاہد خاصخیلی کی اپنی زبانی سنیے جو اس نے مجھے ایک ای میل پیغام میں لکھا ہے۔ صحافی شاہد خاصخیلی نے لکھا ہے اگر وہ مارا جائے تو اسکا یہ میسج ریکارڈ پر رہے۔
شاہد خاصحیلی مجھے اپنے انٹرنیٹ پیغام میں لکھتے ہیں (جو میں جوں کے توں یہاں پیش کر رہا ہوں) :
’میں شاہد خاصخیلی، رپورٹر کے ٹی این نیوز اینڈ کاوش میرپور خاص۔ آج سے چار روز قبل مسنگ پرسن ایک شخص بشیر آریسر میرپور خاص کے نزدیک عمرکوٹ-میرپور خاص روڈ کے قریب سے ملا تھا۔ اسکی خبر کے ٹی این نیوز سے بریک ہوئي تھی۔ پھر میں رات گۓ میرپور خاص سے نکل کر بدین کے ایک گاؤں جا کر اسکی فوٹیج لیکر آیا۔ وہ کے ٹی این پر نشر ہوئی اور کاوش میں اسکی خبر شائع ہوئی۔ مگر صبح کو میرے پیچھے ایجنیسوں والے لگ گئے۔ وہ میرے آفس میں آئے اور بعد میں زبردستی مجھے آئي ایس آئی کے مرپور خاص میں واقع آفس میں طلب کیا گیا اور ڈرایا دھمکایا گیا کہ میں دہشتگروں کی حمایت کر رہا ہوں۔ مطلب یہ کہ مجھ پر یہ الزام صرف مسنگ پرسن کی نیوز چلانے، اسکے ٹوٹے ہوئے چار دانت دکھانے، اسکے منہ کے دونوں مسوڑوں کے نیچے لگي ہوئی لوہے کی پتریاں دکھانے اور اسکے کٹے ہوئے گلے کو دکھانے کی وجہ سے لگ رہا ہے۔ کیا یہ دہشتگردی ہے؟‘
شاہد اپنے پیغام میں لکھتے ہیں ’میں نہ قومپرست ہوں، نہ انتہا پسند۔ میں انسانیت میں یقین رکھنے والا آدمی ہوں۔ لیکن جب سے میں نے میرپور خاص جیسے ’ان سین‘ ایریا میں آکر کام کیا ہے تو وڈیرے، ایجنسیوں والوں اور تمام بیوروکریسی کو انگارے لگ گئے ہیں۔ میں اپنی تعریف نہیں کر رہا مگر کہہ رہا ہوں کہ سچ میں یہ ایک ’ان سین‘ ایریا ہے جہاں ظلم بھی چھپائے جاتے ہیں۔ جہاں خوبصورتی پر بھی پردے ڈالے جاتے ہیں۔‘
آخر میں کاوش کے رپورٹر شاہد خاصخیلی لکھتے ہیں، ’اب میں اپنا سر بچا کر بھیس بدل کر رپوٹنگ کر رہا ہوں، ا ور کرتا رہوں گا۔ برائے مہربانی میرا یہ میسیج ڈیلیٹ مت کیجیے گا اور ریکارڈ پر رکھنا اگر میں مارا جاؤں تو۔‘
پاکستان جیسا ملک، جو صحافیوں کے تحفظ کی عالمی تنظیم کمیٹی ٹو پروٹیکٹ جرنلسٹس (سی پی جے ) کے مطابق دنیا میں صحافیوں کیلیے خطرناک ممالک میں سرفہرست دس ممالک میں شمار ہوتا ہے اور جہاں حیات اللہ سے لیکر شہزاد سلیم جیسے کئي صحافی مارے گۓ ہوں وہاں سندھ کے چھوٹے سے شہر کے صحافی کے پیغام کی یہ سطریں مجھے سندھی شاعر آکاش انصاری کی اس نظم کی یاد دلاتی ہیں:
’اے ماں اے ماں
اگر میں بھی
رات کے رہزنوں کے ہاتھوں
مارا جاؤں
اپنے ساتھیوں کی طرح
ماں تو رونا نہیں
ماں تو رونا نہیں‘

re: Missing Persons’ case

West India Company is not different than East India Company

Same tactics .
They have already killed our Tipu Sultan

re: Missing Persons’ case

:hmmm: and who was Tipu Sultan of Pakistan? I read that besides being great ruler and military genius, Tipu was a very pious man and never ever missed any of his prayers. There was a saint who wished that his Namaz e Janaza would be lead by the one, who never missed any prayers and the Pesh Imam for his Janaza was none other than Tipu Sultan.

re: Missing Persons' case

But i heard same thing about shah altamash

re: Missing Persons’ case

Yeh ilamti bat hoti hay . Kisi ka kisi say muqablah naheen hota .
You may be disliking Bhutto but we could not repair the loss yet .

re: Missing Persons' case

AP uncle I don't dislike Bhutto, I just consider him as a human being prone to errors.

re: Missing Persons' case

You mean Razia ke Abba.

re: Missing Persons' case

ji.............:D