If you are a keen observer of my posts then you will know that I am not interested in being popular but follow my convictions. I had no interest in Mirza Ghulam Ahmed until I came across the other thread and started to look into his life in some detail. I was shocked from a religious point but moreso from a human point, as to how a man who claimed to be a prophet could get his daughter-in-law divorced for no fault of her own, but just used her as a tool to further his own personal agenda. Her father writes to Mirza in response to Mirza’s threats "**this will be a new tradition of prophethood and you will have to accept the blackness of ignomony on your face. ** These prophetic words will become true even if they did not do so already.
All you have done is to indulge in emotional rhetoric, and play the victim card. You have not provided any evidence or facts or added anything further to the discussion. Nobody is denying you the right to present your facts and evidence, in fact I want to hear your argument but instead you are just trying to confuse the issue like you always do, without giving us a counter-argument.