Miracles in the Eye

“The eye, with all its features, is a perfect proof evidencing that man is created. The organelles
that constitute the eye must be examined closely to witness how desolated is the evolution
theory about the formation of the eye and the evidences of creation.”

            How did the sense organs, vital for human beings come into existence? How
            did abilities like "seeing" and "smelling" emerge out of nothing? How did a
            man, with his five senses, brain, inner organs working in harmony with each
            other, hands, feet and with his whole body and spirit come into being?

            The evolutionists claim that everything has come into existence as a result
            of coincidences. However there is only one answer to all those questions:
            All living things including the humans have been created in their perfect
            and superior form by a creator; Allah, Who is the sole owner of eternal
            wisdom, knowledge and power. This truth will clearly be confirmed by
            examining the above mentioned abilities.

            All systems in living creatures constitute an insurmountable obstacle for
            the claim of evolution. The questions like; 'how could the complex systems
            like respiratory system, digestive system, circulatory system, systems of
            seeing and hearing come about', 'what would happen if any of those systems
            were not formed at the very same time', have always remained unanswered by
            the evolutionists.=20

            According to the basic assumption of the evolution theory, life generated
            as a result of coincidences. However it is impossible to explain the
            existence of a complex system by coincidences. Therefore such an assumption
            cannot be accepted to be reasonable. To claim that a liver, an ear, a leg
            or an eye could be formed by coincidences is just as illogical as it is to
            claim that the some unrelated parts formed by coincidences came together
            coincidentally to form a refrigerator.=20

            Now let us think about the possibility of the coincidental formation of an
            eye, which is one of the most complex organs of the body. According to the
            evolutionary thought, before the evolution of the eye the living beings
            were naturally blind and they did not have eyes. Is it possible to suppose
            that a living being without eyes be aware of the existence of eyes? Of
            course this is impossible.

            Consider the description of "coincidence" suggested by the evolutionists:
            How come eyes coincidentally are formed in a living being that previously
            did not have an eye?

            - Could the two eye-sockets appropriate to fit the eye, be formed in the
               skull coincidentally?
            - Could two light-transferring spheres full of liquid be formed in those
               eye sockets "coincidentally"?
            - Could two lenses that provide the fraction of light and focus the light
              at the back wall of the eye be formed coincidentally?
            - Could the eye muscles that provide the movements of the eyes be formed on
               their own?
            - Could the retina layer that would perceive the light at the back wall of
               the eye be coincidentally formed?
            - Could the nerves that would connect the eyes to the brain be formed all
               of a sudden on their own?
            - And after all these, could the tear glands that prevent dryness of the
               eyes be formed by coincidences?
            - And could the two eyelids and the eyelashes that protect the eyes from
               dust and similar foreign materials be formed coincidentally?

            The common answer to all these questions is absolutely: "No!" Even Darwin
            himself confessed this reality

Mohd. Ali's wrote:

The questions like; 'how could the complex systems like respiratory system, digestive system, circulatory system, systems of seeing and hearing come about', 'what would happen if any of those systems were not formed at the very same time', have always remained unanswered by the evolutionists.<

The questions have clear and well defined answers, even the crude theory of natural selection proposed by Darwin answers them satisfactorily.

However it is impossible to explain the existence of a complex system by coincidences.<

Again, this is a very subjective allegation from someone who has no idea of what exactly the assumptions made are.

To claim that a liver, an ear, a leg or an eye could be formed by coincidences is just as illogical as it is to claim that the some unrelated parts formed by coincidences came together coincidentally to form a refrigerator.<

Precisely! But then, where does the theory of evolution claim that everything happened by coincidence? You badly need to read up what the theory claims.

According to the evolutionary thought, before the evolution of the eye the living beings were naturally blind and they did not have eyes.<

Ah, my friend, there you have committed yourself by displaying your ignorance on the theory. The theory says, before eyes as known to us today, were perfected by the evolutionary process, organisms possessed visual organs of lesser capability. Evolution, thru the process of survival of the fittest, selected out the best for todays animals.

Is it possible to suppose that a living being without eyes be aware of the existence of eyes? <

What exactly are you referring to?

About all those "coincidentially" questions:

The anwers may indeed be no, because the theory of evolution doesnt claim them to be "yes".

  1. It could well be that two eyed animals outdid one-eyed ones from whom they evolved and hence we have only two-eyed ones today.

  2. ditto

  3. No, initially the lens system might not have been al that efficient, mutations and natural selection over millions of years has made them as we know them now.

Seems to me that all the other questions also can be answered by similar reasoning.

Claiming that evolution is all coincidence is ignorance.