I guessed as much … since you don’t have anything to show so you are trying to go in circle … if i make a statement i back it up with relevant informaion …otherwise it is just your word against mine …
Coming to UNCIP resolution and “Proposal of 1949” … funny you say that UNCIP resolutions are non binding but the “proposal” you refer to is binding … just for your information … ALL resolutions by united nations security council on Kashmir (India Pakistan question) are NON BINDING …
Agian the paragraph i have put is from a UNSC resolution … and not spliced together … just because i have highlighted it in two colour does not mean it is spliced together … here is the statement again with the link
http://www.kashmiri-cc.ca/un/sc2dec57.htm
Observing further that the Governments of India and Pakistan recognize and accept the commitments undertaken by them in the resolutions of the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan dated 13 August 1948 and 5 January 1949, which envisage the determination of the future status of the State of Jammu and Kashmir in accordance with the will of the people through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite, and that Mr. Jarring felt it appropriate to explore what was impeding their full implementation
Regarding UNMOGIP … again your lack of information on this topic is showing … and again i will back it with “relevant facts” …
UNMOGIP: United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan - Background
On 30 March 1951, following the termination of UNCIP, the Security Council, by its resolution 91 (1951) decided that UNMOGIP should continue to supervise the ceasefire in Kashmir. UNMOGIP’s functions were to observe and report, investigate complaints of ceasefire violations and submit its finding to each party and to the Secretary-General.
Maybe UN forgot to mention that India did not agree to UN resolution OR mybe the source of your information is as fabricated as your arguments … next time you come up with an argument … please back them up with relevant facts.