Re: Milad/Mawlid, celebrating the birth of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW)! (merged)
Oh yes btw Mr. Faisal al-Salafi, I did some looking up on the history of your reknowned and faithful teacher, Saleem al-Hilaalee, and for the information of all those Sunni and Shi'a Muslims present here for that matter, be forewarned, that;
Saleem al-Hilaalee was one of al-Albani's foremost students who succeeded al-Albani, who declared ascribed a body, or human form to Allah subhanahu wa ta 'ala. But it doesn't stop there, I found out even more disturbing information....
A book entitled, The Blind Following of Madhhabs, written by so called Shaykh al-Khadjnadee, was edited by a one follower of al-Albani, the Salafi Khwarajite, Saleem al-Hilaalee. In this book, al-Khadjnadee tries miserably and pointlessly to refute the practice of "TAQLID." And this is due partly because of the MIS-TRANSLATION of the book by one SALEEM AL-HILAALEE, the very "SHAYKH" whom Faisal al-Salafi in this thread continues to reference from.
For example, in this book, Blind Following of Madhhabs, Saleem al-Hilaalee translates on page 3:
"I also noticed some places containing that which was superfluous, so I left it out."
So what were these superfluous statements Mr. Hilaalee left out?
THEN you all won't believe this one...
On Page 4, it says that al-Khadjnadee met:
"Shaykh Muhammad Rasheed Ridaa. He helped with al-Mansur Magazine (this was edited by the last named person), and bought all of its back issues and the works of Shaykh Muhammad Abdah, and likewise what had been printed for the works of Shaykh ul-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah and his student Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah."
For this last quote from this deceiving book of lies translated by Saleem al-Hilaalee, most of us from Ahl' as-Sunnah wa'l Jama'ah and people who know a little bit about past, that all FOUR of the last named people had corrupt Aqeedah, as well as being famous for making huge mistakes regarding the Shari'ah.
Further to that, it is a common fact and well known, that Muhammad Rashid Rida and his teacher Muhammad Abduh, were both FREE MASONS who tried their best to reinterpret the Shari'ah according to their own "whims and desires" as Mr. Salafi likes to say so I will use his own words towards him now, and further to that, both those Free Masons claimed that they were going to "reform" Islam from "impurities" and this in turn, led to their eventual lack of belief in the concept of Taqlid. In that way, they stopped believing hte the four schools of fiqh of Hanafi, Shafi'e, Maliki, Hanbali.
Muhammad Rashid Rida and Muhammad Abduh both had a fatwa issued against their heretical beliefs of their time, by the Grand Mufti of Egypt, the blessed Shaykh Muhammad Bakhit al-Muti'i!
Mr. Faisal al-Salafi...I really hope that you know what you've gotten yourself into. This is the party of Dajjal. The scholar whom you quote for Ahadith and their meanings, is praising some of the biggest innovators of the 20th century!
May Allah Azza wa jaal protect us from these sects of misguidance and continue to preserve Ahl' as-Sunnah wa'l Jama'aah against these heretical and corrupted people...Allah Allah Allah keep us preserved in our LOVE for Rasul-Allah Sal' Allahu 'alaiyhi wa sallam.
More quotes of misguidance of Saleem al-Hilaalee (the teacher of Mr. Faisal al-Salafi on this forum), from the book Saleem al-Hilaalee translated called The Blind Following of Madhabs:
Saleem al-Hilaalee said on page 13 of, "For example, the Maalikees leave their arms at their side, during the Salaah and read Qunoot in Fajr, whereas we find Maalik-rahimahullaah-quotes in al-Muwatta; "Chapter: placing the two hands; one upon the other in Prayer... But the later Maalikees use as evidence that Maalik used to pray with his hands hanging at his side, this is ignorance with regard to the madhhab which they follow. Since Ja'far ibn Sulaymaan, the governor of al-Madeenah lashed the Imaam in the year 146H and stretched out his arms until his hands became dislocated and so he was not able to place his hands one over the other in Prayer...."
The above statement by al-Hilaalee claimed that those who follow the Maliki Madhhab only left their hands unfolded in Salah, since Imam Malik (Rahimahullah) had to leave his arms unfolded after being lashed!! He also claims that this is "ignorance with regard to the madhhab which they follow." But in reality, it is he who has fallen into the abyss of ignorance on this issue by 'blind' supposition! Although Imam Malik (Rahimahullah) related two Hadiths supporting the folding of the right hand on the left in Salah in his al-Muwatta, this does not mean that Imam Malik (Rahimahullah) himself always folded his hands in Salah. As you may have read in the section on "The Placing of Hands in Prayer", I quoted the most authoritative position of the Maliki madhhab, as well as what Imam Malik himself said about placing the hands in Salah. Here is the quote again for good measure; and for the displacement of ignorant claims: "In al- Mudawwanah (vol. 1, pg. 75-76), Imam Malik has been recorded to have said, 'Putting the right hand on the left in salah, I have no knowledge of it in the compulsory (Fard) prayer, it is thus disliked (Makrooh). But in the supererogatory (Nafl) prayer their is no harm (in folding the hands), it is left to the individual to decide.' Please ask yourselves who is ignorant, al-Hilaalee or the Maliki scholars?!
I have more to come....respeted brother Ahmed G, let it be known that the Salafi's are not only Khawarijites, but collaborators with founding Free Masons in Egypt.