Microsoft wants to put data centers at the bottom of the sea

Microsoft is on a mission to put its server farms at the bottom of the ocean. That might sound self-destructive, but there’s method in the madness – such an approach, the company believes, could make data centers faster, greener and easier to set up. In August last year, engineers placed an enormous steel capsule 30 feet underwater in the Pacific Ocean. Inside was a single data center rack, enveloped in pressurised nitrogen to keep it cool. The crew couldn’t reach it, at least not physically, but it didn’t matter – the setup worked, going so far as to run commercial tasks for Azure.

The prototype submersible is called Leona Philpot, another nod to the Halo universe (after Cortana and Spartan). As the New York Times reports, the pod was kitted out with 100 sensors to measure every aspect of the underwater conditions – pressure, humidity and, perhaps most importantly, motion. The idea is that similar capsules could exist beneath the surface, linked to one another in a chain, and continually generate energy from the moving seawater. Looking ahead, there’s also hope that the aquatic environment could be used to naturally cool the racks.

These aren’t the only advantages though. Server farms usually exist inland, far away from metropolitan areas. From a performance standpoint, their locations are inefficient for people living near the coastline – placing data centers offshore could, in theory, reduce latency for these places. Microsoft also believes that a smaller design could reduce installation times, from two years down to a staggering 90 days, making its operations cheaper and more flexible. The capsules themselves could also adopt new, innovative rack designs that don’t need to consider human interaction.

There are environmental concerns, but Microsoft appears to be tackling them. It wants the data centers to be fully recyclable, and says its current prototype emits an “extremely” small amount of heat into the surrounding waters. Still, for people that love the ocean, this could be seen as yet another encroachment on mother nature. In the meantime, Microsoft has pulled Leona Philpot ashore – covered in barnacles, unsurprisingly – while it designs a new prototype that’s reportedly three times larger.

Microsoft wants to put data centers at the bottom of the sea

Re: Microsoft wants to put data centers at the bottom of the sea

If that cracks... what will happen?

Re: Microsoft wants to put data centers at the bottom of the sea

If it cracks, what do you think will happen? Its a dumb idea, just there for sake of attention. If you really want to save energy and cooling costs, put datacenter in north and south poles or close to them... generate energy from wind and cool with the same wind as well.

Re: Microsoft wants to put data centers at the bottom of the sea

Cool story bro. Gives a new meaning to watercooling.

Re: Microsoft wants to put data centers at the bottom of the sea

bhaines ki aankh these uni. graduates are not going to rest till they bring life to extinction.

Re: Microsoft wants to put data centers at the bottom of the sea

Not a technical guy, but Pacific ocean borders Seattle where Microsoft resides. Putting datacenter at one of the poles means running hundreds and thousands of miles of cables through international waters and several countries.

Re: Microsoft wants to put data centers at the bottom of the sea

Pacific Rim highway :wub:

microsoft :asa:

Re: Microsoft wants to put data centers at the bottom of the sea

Running cables to north pole is worth it... especially when cascadia subduction zone is active (again) and it is just matter of time when there is a major movement and takes the whole datacenter or datacenters with it. I've been involved with datacenters for last 15+ years and this is as dumb as they come. Facebook and google have datacenter in the Arctic (since 2013), why can't Microsoft? To me this just seems like marketing gimmick for Microsoft's azure platform.

On top of that you have to find people who are not scared of water, are not scared of deep sea and close tight spaces and who can work and concentrate on highly available environment, in very stressful and demanding IT roles (there is remote access to manage the environments but someone has to set things up first and for maintenance, etc.)