he dared to picture some of hindu goddesses in naked and half naked poses..on behalf of art…something could not be tollerated by hindu natinalist forces…
India’s most celebrated artist MF Husain has been offered Qatar nationality, according to a report in The Hindu.
The report said that Husain was “Honoured by Qatar nationality” but deeply saddened by his enforced exile and the need now to give up the citizenship of the land of his birth, which he has lovingly and secularly celebrated in his art covering a period of over seven decades.
Indian government does not allow dual citizenship, therefore, Husain will have to give up his Indian passport if he decides to take up Qatar citizenship.
The report also said that Husain did not apply for Qatar nationality and that it was conferred upon him at the instance of the modernising emirate’s ruling family.
The artist has been living in Dubai since the hate campaign against him started in India in 2006.
Didn't expect this from you. Should we justify one "uncouth tribal behavior" with another?
burqa i 100% support MF hussain on this issue and his coming back to india.. However there is parallel with prophet cartoons. Reason is that Hussain was asked repeatedly to stop depicting goddesses in such positions. He might be doing it for art but there was already a public sentiment against his exhibitions in bombay.
People with their mind rubbed in religious $%^^ could never come out of it and it is unfortunate that india has lost the most celebrated painter.
According to reports yesterday RSS leader already said that they had nothing against MF hussain.
MF Hussain is one perverted old man...disgusting, especially that thing about Madhuri. LOL
But yeah, Hindus portrait some of their Goddesses such as Kali half naked all the time. So what's the big deal? Some Hindus even pray to a Phallus...
^^ He is a respected painter. I have in person seen copies of his paintings :D and some of them i could keep watching for minutes..not for them being erotic but for the art
Muslims in iran and some other countries have depictions of prophet..beautiful ones..still someone could be murdered for making a good movie on prophet. Also remember kurt westergaard still remains under protection for the cartoons coz some lunatic can slit his throat anytime.
Muslims in iran and some other countries have depictions of prophet..beautiful ones
And while some Orthodox Sunnis may disagree with that, no one has threatened them over their respectful portraiture of the Prophet and his family.
..still someone could be murdered for making a good movie on prophet.
Who, pray tell, was murdered for making a "good" film on the Prophet? If you're referring to Moustapha Akkad, who directed The Messenger, he was killed in a random act of terrorism, not specifically murdered over the film (which didn't actually portray the Prophet for that matter).
And while some Orthodox Sunnis may disagree with that, no one has threatened them over their respectful portraiture of the Prophet and his family.
Who, pray tell, was murdered for making a "good" film on the Prophet? If you're referring to Moustapha Akkad, who directed The Messenger, he was killed in a random act of terrorism, not specifically murdered over the film (which didn't actually portray the Prophet for that matter).
I'd agree right away on first part..because these paintings predate sunni wahabism that has swept world now..
question to you for the first part was the response from muslims justified? I'd appreciate straight answers..
on second part if the portrayal is defaming or disrespectful is killing someone like theo van gogh justified? On similar lines hussain haters can find reasoning easily..
I was referring to moustapha and reference stands incorrect, i take it back..it was random terrorism and not directed on him.
Disgracing Allah, Prophet PBUH or other Islamic dignatories is same if some one disgrace Hindu gods or godesses. One must respect the sanctity of relegious beliefs whether Hindu, Christian or Muslim.
I'd agree right away on first part..because these paintings predate sunni wahabism that has swept world now..
No...people still produce portraits of the Prophet, Imam Ali, and Hazrat Fatima in Iran and other Shia-majority areas. Nor has Wahabism "swept the world" today - they still only represent a small minority in most of the Muslim world.
question to you for the first part was the response from muslims justified? I'd appreciate straight answers..
I'm not sure what you're talking about - Shias are Muslim.
on second part if the portrayal is defaming or disrespectful is killing someone like theo van gogh justified?
I don't agree with hunting down and killing people on the street. But I have no problem with protests and boycotts.
burqa i 100% support MF hussain on this issue and his coming back to india.. However there is parallel with prophet cartoons. Reason is that Hussain was asked repeatedly to stop depicting goddesses in such positions. He might be doing it for art but there was already a public sentiment against his exhibitions in bombay.
People with their mind rubbed in religious $%^^ could never come out of it and it is unfortunate that india has lost the most celebrated painter.
According to reports yesterday RSS leader already said that they had nothing against MF hussain.
Thanks bhai.
Mohammad pbuh was physically and verbally abused almost on daily basis when he was alive.
And guess what? He pbuh forgave them all the time. In some ways he was doing the same as per Jesus Christ's teaching.
--- If someone hits you on your cheek, then turn your other cheek towards the perpetrator.
However the Pagans of Makkah would kill anyone who disrespected their stone gods.
And guess what,
The Muslims of today are following Makkah's Pagan traditions, when they support and implement blasphemy laws.
Making nude or otherwise paintings of gods and goddesses is trivial and it should always be considered as someone's rebellious expression,
And not something that would ACTUALLY hurt the gods or the goddesses.
hussein is NOT doing it for any artistic expression and there is nothing for him to be rebelling from. Once I can understand but repeating the act simply proves he is an closet hater who is using "art" to insult the religion he hates. It is plain and simple.
An immoral lecher whose only expression is that he suffers the same inferiority complex that the jihadis feel and instead of expressing through bombs like the jihadis do, this sob is doing it through lecherous paintings aimed to hurt.
So far he has been protected by the Indians but there is no guarantee. Some crackpot may decide enough is enough and try to attack this sob.
It is therefore better that hussein gets his sorry arse out of India and never return
A talented person like Hussain was hounded out of India by those who did not have the courage to take on him using the judiciary. Debates could go on about the element of greatness in his work of art and courts could decidewhether he intended to insult the Hinbdu sentiments or it was nothing but another artistic expression. By not doing so, not only did India lose one of its immensely worthy artists, but it also reflected on the limitations of the civil society there.
I hope talentless twits whose fame and fortune is the result of 'looking artistic' and who are filled with hate for fellow human beings - such as this sob m.f.hussein leave or thrown out one way or other. Why waste public money on that scum