Re: Men and fantasies -- yuck!
Once again read context. Dimagh_HotaToNa editted her post at 1:27. MQ posted at 2:33. So I assume she did not read the original post. As there is an hour difference. She commented on that fact that women can be held responsible for her own actions in such a situation.
At 3:04 Dimagh_HotaToNa stated that she agreed with MQ that the girl had a part to play. But look at the context of the discussion. Until the post of Dimagh_HotaToNa at 3:04 nobody knew the details nor the situation of an abusive uncle.
It was all very general discussion - discussing fantasies.
If you fail to realise that the conversation changed from a general discussion to a very specific one where an individual is a creep (Edit i mean the uncle in this case, just to clarify) then you are indeed narrow minded or ignorant.
Context is what you are missing. MQ's post was a general comment on male fantasies and that women are sometimes the cause for that. It takes two to tango. The conversation then changed to that of abuse.