Were the attacks of Mehmood Ghaznavi justfied in the light of islam???
He attacked sub continent and destroyed Somnat, and carried along all the treasure … what does it mean ???
[quote]
Originally posted by Lucifer:
Were the attacks of Mehmood Ghaznavi justfied in the light of islam???
He attacked sub continent and destroyed Somnat, and carried along all the treasure ... what does it mean ?????
[/quote]
don't pick one piece of history. if you learnt it just today, that is fine, bring the other pieces in your thread as well, please.
what happened before him, after him, what were circumstances, what made him do that...etc.
Thanks.
===================
don't pick one piece of history. if you learnt it just today, that is fine, bring the other pieces in your thread as well, please.
what happened before him, after him, what were circumstances, what made him do that...etc
Hey pal no need to be tough ... All i want is to know the circumstances .. and after that was it justified in the light of islam or not .... I asked for ure view ... not for ure CHUSSI ....
Try to stick to the point and also do me a favour ... next time plz pplz answer according to the question ask .. and plz dnt answer ure preconcieved question ....
I ll be greatful
Rust in PEace
P.S no offense
[quote]
Originally posted by Lucifer:
.....ure view ... not for ure CHUSSI ....
Try to stick to the point and also do me a favour .....
P.S no offense
[/quote]
can you explain this word "CHUSSI" please?
We oughta be Changez like, don't we?
Since its about Ghazna a little back ground on the warrior. More will follow latter.
From Britannica.
http://members.eb.com/bol/topic?eu=37387&sctn=3#s_top
Ghazan’s accomplishments were in no way restricted to his activities on
the battlefield. A man of great intellectual curiosity, he was
conversant with such diverse topics as natural history, medicine,
astronomy, and chemistry and was also an adept in several
handicrafts. “No one surpassed him,” says the Byzantine historian
Pachymeres, “in making saddles, bridles, spurs, greaves and helmets; he
could hammer, stitch and polish, and in such occupations employed the
hours of his leisure from war.” Besides his native Mongolian, he is
said to have had a knowledge of the Arabic, Persian, Hindi, Kashmiri,
Tibetan, Chinese, and Frankish (i.e., probably French) languages.
It was at his suggestion and with his assistance that his vizier Rashid
ad-Din composed a celebrated history of the Mongols, which was later
expanded to embrace all the peoples of Asia and Europe with which their
conquests had brought them in contact. Rashid ad-Din, Ghazan’s great
minister, was perhaps the real author of the fiscal reforms that go
under his master’s name and that were designed to protect the sedentary
population from the extortions of the nomad aristocracy. These
measures, coupled with the adoption of Islam, must have played their
part in welding the Mongols and Persians (like the Normans and English)
into a single nation, and the Il-Khans might have ended, like the
Plantagenets, by becoming a truly national dynasty. In fact, Ghazan
himself, by his ruthless elimination of princely rivals, must have
contributed to the extinction of the Il-Khanids, who survived his death
by little more than 30 years
The question was:
“Were the attacks of Mehmood Ghaznavi justfied in the light of islam???”
“The answer by Abdali is about Gaznavi’s special interests other than battle”
How relevant an answer…well what else can one expect here! and it seems more of this irrelevance is going to follow!
http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/hehe.gif
[This message has been edited by kumarakn (edited August 10, 2001).]
baray daant nikal rahay hein janab…kia baat hai?..ajj koi tooth-brush mil gaya tha free mein kia?..
maskeen te ghumgeen…
DerVaisH
muhabatein theen kabhi apne dermian kitni…
bicha gaye hai anna hum mein doorian kitni…
abhi to toota hai dil hi teri judai mein…
girein gi hum pe abhi aur bijlian kitni…
Please read my first line it said more to follow. But your narrow mind coupled with your narrow scope on top of that Indian history books makes you dangerous. Little knowledge is too dangerous.
Before I post further in the context of Islam I thought it is better to have a little back ground on the subject.
You have alreday ruined this thread, I am out of here.