I dont know What this guy is got Deep behind his Kufri Illuminati Mind…He plans to make a Movie on Muhammad…
There must be some thing fishy going on through his intentions…
***If not…Why then a Non muslim, Illuminati elevated Oskar Winner got a sudden Fascination with the prophet of Islam, when he doesn’t like him nor believe in him…??? ***
The news article Goes below
Matrix producer plans Muhammad biopic
Monday 2 November 2009 11.00 GMT
Barrie Osborne, part of the Oscar-winning team behind the Lord of the Rings films, says the new production ‘will educate people about the true meaning of Islam’
Producer Barrie Osborne cast Keanu Reeves as the messiah in The Matrix and helped defeat the dark lord Sauron in his record-breaking Lord of the Rings trilogy. Now the Oscar-winning American film-maker is set to embark on his most perilous quest to date: making a big-screen biopic of the prophet Muhammad.
Budgeted at around $150m (£91.5m), the film will chart Muhammad’s life and examine his teachings. Osborne told Reuters that he envisages it as “an international epic production aimed at bridging cultures. The film will educate people about the true meaning of Islam”.
Osborne’s production will reportedly feature English-speaking Muslim actors. It is backed by the Qatar-based production company Alnoor Holdings, who have installed the Muslim scholar Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi to oversee all aspects of the shoot. In accordance with Islamic law, the prophet will not actually be depicted on screen.
“The film will shed light on the Prophet’s life since before his birth to his death,” Ahmed Abdullah Al-Mustafa, Alnoor’s chairman, told al-Jazeera. “It will highlight the humanity of Prophet Muhammad.”
The as-yet-untitled picture is due to go before the cameras in 2011. It remains to be seen, however, whether it will be beaten to cinemas by another Muhammad-themed drama. Late last year, producer Oscar Zoghbi announced plans to remake The Message, his controversial 1976 drama that sparked a fatal siege by protesters in Washington DC. The new version, entitled The Messenger of Peace, is currently still in development.
Is that your old classmate Muhammad that you mention in your post? If you're referring to The Holy Prophet (SAW), then you should be more respectful and write Sallallah u alaihe wasallam or (SAW) after his name.
Is that your old classmate Muhammad that you mention in your post? If you're referring to The Holy Prophet (SAW), then you should be more respectful and write Sallallah u alaihe wasallam or (SAW) after his name.
You are right My dear......
May Allah Forgive me and give me more knowledge.........Thankyou...
I think in this day and age even the movie like The Message was a big hit and i think it did spread a good message among westerns.
However if you remember the character of Holy Prophet SAW was never displayed.
However I am not sure would it be a good idea to display a man as Holy Prophet SAW (The greatest of Prophets) I find it slightly Blasphmous. What are your opinions?
I think in this day and age even the movie like The Message was a big hit and i think it did spread a good message among westerns.
However if you remember the character of Holy Prophet SAW was never displayed.
However I am not sure would it be a good idea to display a man as Holy Prophet SAW (The greatest of Prophets) I find it slightly Blasphmous. What are your opinions?
What do u MEAN by 'slightly blasphemous'
Now that's some figure of speech... handicapped!
What do u MEAN by 'slightly blasphemous'
Now that's some figure of speech... handicapped!
Well when I say slightly Blasphmous...its my personal opinion...how would you feel a man acting like Holy Prophet SAW?...I mean I just wont be able to see someone doing a role of Holy Prophet SAW physicaly.
U are with it refers to 'displaying a man as a Prophet (Naooz-u-billah)' ???
With some concerns!
You know what you are very ignorant or you are one of those Prawns who landed from Mars who perhaps dont understand how H U M A N S speak.
If you ponder again with glasses on this time on my post and not to whats written on my signature then you might realise that this is exactly what I said; that I am with the making of the movie but not a person acting as a character of Holy Prophet Muhammad SAW.
You know what you are very ignorant or you are one of those Prawns who landed from Mars who perhaps dont understand how H U M A N S speak.
If you ponder again with glasses on this time on my post and not to whats written on my signature then you might realise that this is exactly what I said that I said I am with the making of the movie but not a person acting as a character of Holy Prophet Muhammad SAW.
Yet again... why would ur sig. be of any importance to me? Delusional? Let alone ur posters.
Check ur posters/answers... they r baffling. Even to normal Humans. And I won't go on labeling/insulting ur highness with derogatory remarks or as such. Its you, u have ur feet right left and centre.
I think this time u would GET it!
So... back to the discussion... why are r u with making such a movie, without even knowing what's exactly on the director's, without knowledge about the content!
If its 'cos of the past movies, do u think the Message or others in the past have had any significant impact!!!
^Alot people converted to Islam after watching "The Message"...talking about impact...
However I am not sure would it be a good idea to display a man as Holy Prophet SAW (The greatest of Prophets) I find it slightly Blasphmous. What are your opinions?
"In accordance with Islamic law, the prophet will not actually be depicted on screen."
Yet again... why would ur sig. be of any importance to me? Delusional? Let alone ur posters.
Check ur posters/answers... they r baffling. Even to normal Humans. And I won't go on labeling/insulting ur highness with derogatory remarks or as such. Its you, u have ur feet right left and centre.
I think this time u would GET it!
my remarks were in accordance to your reply...so please stay on topic from here on.
what's wrong with them doing it from a historical standpoint as long as it is accurate (there is little conflict between muslim scholars and orientalists about the life of the Prophet (saw)) and as long as they are sympathetic (not depicting the Prophet (saw))?