Massacre at Qana

Re: Massacre at Qana

Sir get your blinders off and stop eating your hay for a while. Where do the articles you posted say that any of the casualties were caused by rocket fire. And like I said for 6000 rockets fired into an area I don’t much of proportioanal casualties. Articles cannot justify dumb-arse logic that you presented Sir.

Re: Massacre at Qana

Hopefully Hiz fires some more rockets into the terrorist state so the Israeli civilian death toll becomes even as the Lebanese one. Only then should there be a cease fire, and only then will the terrorist state of Israel think twice about initiating a genocide.

I hope they burn in hell.

*NOTE: refrain from badmouthing please! *

Re: Massacre at Qana

Well Hiz can do whatever they want. Cows haven't come home since 1948. who knows we start hearing the cowbells soon.

Re: Massacre at Qana

How many casualties would be acceptable in your neighborhood? How many rockets would you consider OK? Blinders? Tell me how many of your friends family and neighbors could be killed before you did what you were able to stop them.

Israel withdrew from Gaza and from Lebanon, and the bombardments did not stop. That is a fact. When you bombard a neighbor with a vastly superior neighbor, you cannot count on restraint forever. At some point they will stop the tit-for-tat encounters and give you amighty slap. That is precisely what is happening now.

Do you think Hizbullah knew that if Israel attacked that lots of innocents would die? If they did, and it is hard to imagine that they did not think about this, why did they persist? The fact is that they were willing to absorb these deaths. That was cold calculation, that they felt may well work to their advantage in world opinion. How cynical. But hell, If Muslims are willing to cynically use these deaths, what does that tell you about these people?

You all know this is true. It is the dirty little secret that you are not allowed to even whisper about.

Re: Massacre at Qana

Amusing. The death of Lebanese civilians is entirely in Jewish control at the moment. They can choose not play in hizb's hands if they wish.
A mighty slap will not get a peace agreement which they have been 'sincerely' looking for.

Re: Massacre at Qana

WOW...how beautifully these americans and their "accepted paki servants" r defending israeli open terrorism...israelis r killing innocent people as it is clear to every1...they strike resident areas as much as they can and their western beast fully back them...SHABASH....oh yeah,afterall Ohioguy is an american and americans can kiill 300 people in a marriage ceremoney,thinking tht it was some kind of al qaeda terrorists gathering and then say " a mistake"..come to the west please...means come to the uncivilized world:)

Re: Massacre at Qana

tht shows how much clever these israelis r…israelis know tht they r living on illegal state…they r living on the captured houses…they know tht they have to be beast in order to survive…so they r training their young ones so tht in future,they can also be great terrorist heros…
this is also something for muslims countries as they should know only the fittest will survive…antiobl could have learn some but unfortunately..

Re: Massacre at Qana

You guys somehow think that you have the high moral ground? Lets review some fast statistics. Who do you think has killed more women and old people? Not what you think! Here is the summary of a study done on four years casualties of the Intifada. Read it then we will discuss it.

Go here to understand this table:
http://www.ict.org.il/casualties_project/stats_page.cfm

**Breakdown of Fatalities: 27 September 2000 through 1 January 2005

** Palestinians
3179
Israelis
1010
No. of whom were female
140
No. of whom were female
316
Non-Combatants killed by Opposite Side
No. of whom were female
1099

103
Non-Combatants killed by Opposite Side
No. of whom were female
764
306
Combatants killed by Opposite Side
1542
Combatants killed by Opposite Side
215
People killed by actions of own side
406
People killed by actions of own side
22
Non-Combatants below age 12
88
Non-Combatants below age 12
46
Non-Combatant Males between ages 12-29
581
Non-Combatant Males between ages 12-29
178
Non-Combatants Aged >= 45
89
Non-Combatants Aged >= 45
255

Re: Massacre at Qana

haha ohioguy...u made me laugh...
wht u say abt those plenty of BABIES who were killed by israelis by snipers???
wht u say abt occupied houses of palestine???wht u say abt the a-hole atitude of israelis???
u r one lost candidate for the pope position;)

Re: Massacre at Qana

Sir, you have skirted around what I said by giving more and more topics to discuss. If you don't have an answer then be quiet. I asked for concrete evidence about 6000 rockets being fired. Like I said with that many rockets fired how could be casualty rate be so low. You never came back with a reply. Never heard anything in the news about casualties caused from those 6000 rockets. Like I said all concocted BS. Just media fodder to fool people.

Next you throw in a bunch of statistics which have no source and they have to do with the Intifada where as we are dicussing according to your claim that Hizbs have fired over 6000 rockets into Israel without even hitting an ice cream stand and that has been causing the powerful State of Israel to **** their pants. Are you having lapses in your comprehension of what is being asked? Or are you going to pull out another fantastic biblical media news article.

Re: Massacre at Qana

Israel has killed 800 civilians in JUST 18 DAYS.

That's a killing record that no combatant in this present conflict (Gaza to Lebanon) holds, except the JEWISH STATE.

WAR CRIMINALS!

Re: Massacre at Qana

So you want us to believe an Israeli source for these numbers? Also, if Palestinian had the means that Israeli military has, the number of dead Israeli woman/children would have been close to nothing as, unlike coward Zionist militia, Muslim freedom fighters do care and respect woman. Nevertheless, going in to this detail and understanding the raison d’être about why so many Israeli citizens have departed in this conflict would be beyond you. For a better breakdown of numbers, you should perhaps find an alternative source. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violence_in_the_Israeli-Palestinian_conflict_2003#Palestanians_Deaths_vs_Israeli_Death.September_28th.2C_2000-_February_15.2C_2006

Re: Massacre at Qana

Re: Massacre at Qana

Well fine. Let’s use your Wiki, which is the simplest and stupidest analysis around. But let’s go with it.

Palestinians Killed

Total: 4209
Men:3044
Women:273
Children:892

Israelis Killed

Total:1113
Men:603
Women:305
Children:113

**So right off the bat, there have been more Israeli women killed than men, Right?

**There is a big difference in Children and Men killed. Let’s take children first. Children are almost universally defined as Under 18 years old. So what explains the difference?

Have a look at this graph, it is from a different time frame, but it explains the disparity:

This is from here:
http://www.ict.org.il/articles/articledet.cfm?articleid=439

Notice anything?

This study looks at the age breakdowns of the casualties. It shows a huge bulge in the deaths of adolescent kids. Why? We all know why. These kids love to go riot in the streets and screw around with the Israeli soldiers. Many of them are recruited at very young ages to assist even if they are not carrying weapons.

but what you can clearly see is that kids from ages 0-9 have a **very **small death rate, as they are presumably kept safe and near there mothers.

So how about the men? Well, your Wiki is so stupid that *it does not distinguish between combatants and non-combatants.

*Here is another graph from the same source that attempts to parse out Palestinian combatants from non-combatants. Presumably most combatants are men right?

Get it? Most of the men killed are combatants. This makes sense in two ways. First if Israel were just killing people willy-nilly, the ratio of men killed to women should be about 50/50, by the Wiki statistics, it is 10:1. Second, we all know that Israel has superior military capability, so they should indeed be able to kill more legitimate targets. Arguably the majority of 3000 men could be legitimate fighters.

Lastly, we should all be able to concede that the elderly are generally innocent non-combatants. Here is a final graph that shows that during the period of this study a much larger number of the Israeli dead were older people, and thus probably not combatants.

So, The Palestinians kill more women. The Palestinians kill more old people. The Israelis kill more children, but the children are seldom under the age of nine. Over 75% of the total Palestinians killed are men, and the vast majority of these may well be combatants. Israel kills more children age 12-18, but guess what? When you look at a graph of age groups of non-combatant deaths versus non-combatant deaths, they look remarkably similar.

Lets not play victim until you understand that the Palestinians are just as culpable.

Re: Massacre at Qana

So heavily armed Israeli soldiers have every right to kill rock throwing kids on land the soldiers are occupying...oh what a sweathheart this Ohioguy is...

Of course, it's the Palestinains fault for not locking up their kids in the basement...of having them out in the streets attempting to find some semblance of normalcy. No, obviously all 800 kids were militants...caught in the act...not just kids playing in the streets caught in the cross fire, or even gasp, shock, horror chanting slogans...

Nothing is more revealing of the absolute contempt and cheapness Americans and Israelis have for Palestinians by white wshing the killing of Arab children, and then having the gaul to blame their parents for allowing the kids to be...well, kids...how easy is it to live in a fantasy land where every kid killed is a gun carrying militant?

Spare me the above, please...

Re: Massacre at Qana

Or the Palestinians are using teenagers as fighters(gosh, is that hard to believe), and it is difficult to distinguish who is a gun carrying teen from an innocent teen, so they both get killed at about the same rate.

Re: Massacre at Qana

^ Still trying to justify the murders committed by Israelis. Remember what you have posted here when you are denouncing the suicide bombers. if you can justify one lot of terrorist than you have no right to condemn the other lot. In fact IDF terrorists are far worse than the suicide bombers. a few days ago you did justify the first lot of massacares carried out at Qana so no one should be surprised by you justifying this one as well.

Re: Massacre at Qana

Ohioguy:

[quote]
and it is difficult to distinguish who is a gun carrying teen from an innocent teen
[/quote]

This Nazi is saying it as if his fellow Nazis really care about civilians!
Distinguish between gun-carrying and innocent teen? Nazis should first AT LEAST be able to read "UN" on a BUILDING before making excuses about what color clothes were people wearing.

Surely, nothing ashames Nazis. Not even murder.

Re: Massacre at Qana

Funny how anti-Semites of today love to use the term Nazi. No wonder they are slaves of Nazi philosophy.

Re: Massacre at Qana

Surely there is a brain in there somewhere.

Simply repeating "Nazi" over and over is really getting to be boring. Perhaps you could discuss the topic of civilian casualties without all the emotional hype. Because the facts really do not fit the Nazi profile at all if you look at them rationally. But then again, the emotional frenzy is in and of itself a weapon isn't it?

Go burn a flag or a KFC somewhere. Make yourself useful.