Martial Law Vs Democracy

[Silaaj]

Re: Martial Law Vs Democracy

@sachaydino

This system is now moving from two sharing holders to three. Judiciary is making inroads in the administration of government which is quite dangerous to the stability of country. I have said it many times and I am saying again, unless true democracy would not function in the country, the country would head for another breakup. Pakistan has faced this tragedy in 1971 will further face disaster if army and judiciary encroach in the administration of civilian government.

More shareholders is a good idea. It keeps everyone in check, as opposed to a singular power. When it comes to the military, it is run by the order of 1 (or at the most, 2) persons, sitting at the top. When it comes to our major political parties, they are run the same way, with 1 decision maker. Judiciary is more balanced, and has checks and balances, and can be questioned. Decisions can be appealed, laws can be amended, repealed, etc. This does not exist in politics and military, where the word of the boss is never questioned.

All institutions must be allowed to do their job. It would be nice to see democracy flourish within political parties as well, as that is when we will see real democracy in the country.