You do realize the two research articles you linked to, are contradicting each other. And what is ironic is that they are done by the same person. So even he can't agree on his own research. And have you heard of the statement "correlation does not imply causation"? Just because A and B are somehow related, does not mean that A causes B or vice versa. The two articles presented do not provide sufficient explanation for why the two theories it has presented happen. Since it doesn't provide that data, it can't be that accurate now can it? Also the data is restricted to one country's population and is simply a demographic study. Before you can extrapolate that data to the population of an entire world, it has to be repeated across the entire world, or at least countries from each continent at least. And studies of such nature will probably also show you that banana eaters are more likely to be rich. Does such a study show you how exactly eating bananas causes a person to earn a higher income? Not really, because these two factors aren't really related. Another thing, do these two research articles take into account prior living situations ie before getting married? What if these couples divorced after the data was accumulated? Does that somehow increase or decrease the individual's survival years? Here's the fall out with demographic research; it's not a longitudinal study. Only with a longitudinal study can you for certain say that yes A causes B. All you're showing is how A and B exist.
Look buddy if your mom comes to you and says beta I have a rishta for you and she's even a day older than you, then say no. It's simple as that. But don't try to show to the rest of the world that "scientific" research says that you can't marry that girl because A) she will die before you or B) she will kill you by just being a day older than you.
^ irrelevant
don't show us your theory just post some links, just like muqa sat some examples, it was really appreciated, if your are such a researcher who is trying to prove wrong other authentic peoples researches, then go and write some articles, and sits on their heads not mine, don't waste your time here. BTW it is not my view that is why i didn't post on first place when u and other asked, i only posted when muqa asked, so that's not my view bc i myself have been with older women. so plz show some authentic research or else meri taraf say Salam, Bc i don't like arguments. peace
No one’s arguing here. We’re having a discussion. This is a discussion board after all. And if TL;DR, all I said was that your links don’t support your theory. And that’s what it is. A theory. You can’t draw definite conclusions from it. If you believe that a traditional couple should be a man older than a woman, for whatever reason, then good for you.
And research what? What I posted was something you’d learn in a regular old statistics class. Nothing too complicated in it.
Could just be me but I don’t see anything wrong with the initial post the said member here made. Unhealthy could always translate down to the woman being more mature than the guy, and there is absolutely nothing wrong in believing that.
KK aao yahan se chalen