Man can sue for distress over surprise pregnancy

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/02/24/sperm.theft.ap/index.html

Man can sue for distress over surprise pregnancy
But sperm were hers to keep, court rules
Thursday, February 24, 2005 Posted: 1:08 PM EST (1808 GMT)

CHICAGO, Illinois (AP) – An appeals court said a man can press a claim for emotional distress after learning a former lover had used his sperm to have a baby. But he can’t claim theft, the ruling said, because the sperm were hers to keep.

The ruling Wednesday by the Illinois Appellate Court sends Dr. Richard O. Phillips’ distress case back to trial court.

Phillips accuses Dr. Sharon Irons of a “calculated, profound personal betrayal” after their affair six years ago, saying she secretly kept semen after they had oral sex, then used it to get pregnant.

He said he didn’t find out about the child for nearly two years, when Irons filed a paternity lawsuit. DNA tests confirmed Phillips was the father, the court papers state.

Phillips was ordered to pay about $800 a month in child support, said Irons’ attorney, Enrico Mirabelli.

Phillips sued Irons, claiming he has had trouble sleeping and eating and has been haunted by “feelings of being trapped in a nightmare,” court papers state.

Irons responded that her alleged actions weren’t “truly extreme and outrageous” and that Phillips’ pain wasn’t bad enough to merit a lawsuit. The circuit court agreed and dismissed Phillips’ lawsuit in 2003.

But the higher court ruled that, if Phillips’ story is true, Irons “deceitfully engaged in sexual acts, which no reasonable person would expect could result in pregnancy, to use plaintiff’s sperm in an unorthodox, unanticipated manner yielding extreme consequences.”

The judges backed the lower court decision to dismiss the fraud and theft claims, agreeing with Irons that she didn’t steal the sperm.

“She asserts that when plaintiff ‘delivered’ his sperm, it was a gift – an absolute and irrevocable transfer of title to property from a donor to a donee,” the decision said. “There was no agreement that the original deposit would be returned upon request.”

Phillips is representing himself in the case. He could not be reached for comment Thursday.

“There’s a 5-year-old child here,” Mirabelli said. “Imagine how a child feels when your father says he feels emotionally damaged by your birth.”

Re: Man can sue for distress over surprise pregnancy

Well, the higher court summed up the matter pretty succinctly.

Hilarious, though.

Re: Man can sue for distress over surprise pregnancy

A girl at work was talking about this, the woman should be slapped!

Re: Man can sue for distress over surprise pregnancy

that's scary

Re: Man can sue for distress over surprise pregnancy

ew !!!!

Re: Man can sue for distress over surprise pregnancy

OK - what the heck?? I just want to know where in this universe someone would (1) get an idea like that... and (2) actually go through with it.....

It is scary and I agree 100% with Sara - ewwwwww.....

Re: Man can sue for distress over surprise pregnancy

Okay I re-read the article now…

WTF IS WRONG WITH THESE IDIOTS??? This nasty woman saves this guy’s sperm and has a kid which e doesn’t even know about and then seh SUES him for child support??? I’m on the guy’s side here. That’s just despicable and disgusting tha ta woman coudl do that. I think if a woman is THAT desparate to have a child and the guy isn’t or isnt’ aware of it, she shouldn’t expect child support from him.

Disgusting … :rolleyes: :yukh:

Re: Man can sue for distress over surprise pregnancy

^ He shudnt have ****ed her in the first place.

Re: Man can sue for distress over surprise pregnancy

well they WERE in a relationship, it's not liek it was a one night stand that he didnt' deserve to know if his sperm was gonna be used a year later to have a kid...

Re: Man can sue for distress over surprise pregnancy

........