Malik Ishaq: The freed terrorist prince

The Supreme Court of Pakistan on July 15 released on bail Malik Ishaq, leader and founder of Al Qaeda-linked Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, on grounds of “lack of evidence.” The man had been facing a number of cases at the antiterrorism court in Lahore charging him with hundreds of murders. He remained in jail for 14 years while evidence against him gradually decayed and disappeared—a pattern traced by terrorists in custody, none of whom has so far been punished in a country crawling with terrorist organizations.
*
On his release, he was received outside Kot Lakhpat prison by leaders of Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan, banned in 2001 as a terrorist organization but now—after being renamed harmlessly to Ahle Sunnat wal Jamaat—resting in a legal grey area because of an appeal lying with the higher judiciary. The Sahaba leader heading the welcome party was Maulana Muhammad Ahmad Ludhianvi—recalling an anti-Shia 1980s polemicist who was assassinated in Karachi—who came in handy when the current Army chief, Gen. Ashfaq Kayani, called on Ishaq to talk to the terrorists who had attacked Army General Headquarters in Rawalpindi in 2009. The Army chief’s personal plane had carried Ishaq to Rawalpindi, while another plane belonging to the ISI chief, Gen. Shuja Pasha, carried Ludhianvi.
*
Sipah-e-Sahaba’s welcome party was hardly a dozen strong, but by the time it reached the border of South Punjab, the numbers began to swell. If in Okara it was a few hundred, and a thousand in Khanewal, it was nearly 5,000 in Bahawalpur—the city of Lashkar-e-Jhangvi’s sister terrorist organization, Jaish-e-Muhammad. When Ishaq arrived in his village of Tarinda Sawai Khan in Rahim Yar Khan, the crowd out to greet him was actually 15,000-strong, as claimed by a Sahaba publication.
*
Their newspaper, Daily Ummat Karachi, in its July 16 edition said Ishaq had been freed without any “secret deal” and that he had rededicated himself to war against the proliferation of “insulters” of the Companions of the Prophet (peace be upon him) on the Internet as he now fought under the flag of Sipah-e-Sahaba after disbanding Lashkar-e-Jhangvi. How far Jhangvi will be disbanded after appearing on the flag of Al Qaeda’s 313 Brigade (which includes Jandullah and Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan) is yet to be seen. One reason Ishaq has joined Sahaba is that the banning order against it is on hold and this takes him away from the mischief of the antiterrorism law.
*
According to the publication, Ishaq was wanted in 43 cases, involving 70 murders, out of which he had been acquitted in 37 and awarded bail in eight. The last case, involving planning—from prison—the attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team in Lahore in 2009 has concluded in another bail at the Supreme Court after which he has been released. Earlier resistance to release by the Punjab government had required Lahore to pay for the monthly sustenance of Ishaq’s family. This time Lahore let him go. Daily Ummat says that, because Punjab was not releasing Ishaq, Sipah-e-Sahaba decided to reach an agreement with Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif on electoral support in Bhakkar from where the latter was elected unopposed with the help of Ishaq’s brother.
*
Arriving back in South Punjab, Ishaq has consolidated the power of the hard-line sectarian organizations emanating from the state policy of jihad. He is ranked at par with the chief of Jaish-e-Muhammad, Maulana Masud Azhar, famous for his companionship with Osama bin Laden and his linkage with Omar Sheikh, who contributed to the killing of The Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in Karachi in 2002. Sheikh, too, has been charged with planning terrorist acts—including against then President Pervez Musharraf—from his prison cell in Sindh. Azhar and Sheikh were both sprung from an Indian jail in 1999 and released in Kandahar, after the hijacking of an Indian airliner in Nepal, as a result of a deal facilitated by a Pakistan-dominated Taliban government in Afghanistan.
*
Ishaq headed a union of shopkeepers in Rahim Yar Khan when he fell under the thrall of Maulana Haq Nawaz Jhangvi, the founder of the Shia-apostatizing Sipah-e-Sahaba in 1982 after his contacts with Arab princes enjoying extraterritorial hunting rights in Rahim Yar Khan made him strong. Against the background of an Arab-Iranian confrontation in the region, Sahaba flourished financially, too. The other devotees of Maulana Jhangvi were Jaish-e-Muhammad’s Azhar and Riaz Basra, who was killed in a “police encounter” in 2002 because “no judge could sentence him.” Basra and Ishaq founded Laskhar-e-Jhangvi.
*
After Ishaq was arrested in 1997 in the wake of the killing of five Iranian Air Force trainees in Rawalpindi, Basra threatened the government with dire consequences unless he was released. Meanwhile, another Lashkar-e-Jhangvi commander, Akram Lahori, went on killing Shias in Karachi, which according to Ishaq was much easier because the Jhangvi cadre there was better trained than in the Punjab. (Training was received in Al Qaeda camps in Surobi, Afghanistan.) Facing trial in Multan, Lahori, responsible for the killing of such well-known Karachi figures as businessman Shaukat Mirza and prominent Shia doctors, was indicted in 2010 after living comfortably in jail for seven years. Witnesses against him in Multan continue to die or disappear. Witnesses against Ishaq also have a hard time surviving, as in the case brought against him by a Shia citizen, Fida Husain Ghalvi, charging that Ishaq had killed 10 of his family.
*
The Punjab government has made a deal with Sipah-e-Sahaba after seeing its growing clout in South Punjab. One well-known episode was recorded by jihadist newspaper Islam: “Punjab Law Minister Rana Sanaullah visited Jhang and paid his respects at the tomb of the founder of the greatest banned sectarian-terrorist Deobandi organization, Sipah-e-Sahaba, Maulana Haq Nawaz Jhangvi. He led a delegation of the [Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz)] which also included parliamentary secretary Iftikhar Baloch and party M.P.A. from Jhang, Sheikh Yaqub. He also visited the tombs of other Sipah-e-Sahaba martyr-leaders like Maulana Isarul Qasimi and Allama Azam Tariq.”
*
Threatened communities have reacted predictably. Shia outfit Imamia Students Organization issued the following statement: “The planned release of terror kingpin Malik Ishaq who is also the co-founder of banned organization Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, with the blessing of Punjab government’s weak prosecution and the court’s blind decision is likely to fuel the ruthless killings of Shias across the country.” Sri Lanka, which hoped to get justice for the attack on its cricket team, and Iran, whose cultural consul Muhammad Ali Rahimi was allegedly killed by Ishaq in Multan in 1997, will also be offended. His release was badly timed. President Asif Ali Zardari’s paid a goodwill visit to Iran the same week.
*
When the Iranian consul in Lahore Sadeq Ganji was assassinated in 1990, the strong presence of Sipah-e-Sahaba in politics prevented the due process of law to unfold. At the Lahore High Court, where the killers faced trial, many judges retired or were elevated before the court was able to pass the obvious death sentence. Sahaba wanted to pay diyat or blood money for the killer it wanted spared, and even approached Iran in this respect. The power of apostatizing sectarian elements has redoubled in 2011 and “legal” political parties have to align with them to survive in certain regions. All it takes is a renaming of the banned organization.
*
Ahmed is a director at the South Asian Free Media Association (SAFMA) in Lahore.
*
To comment on this article, email [email protected]

http://www.newsweekpakistan.com/the-take/365

A disturbing article at how people like this are allowed free hand

Re: Malik Ishaq: The freed terrorist prince

Would this be the fault of the judiciary or the Punjab Gov? If what they say is true about the PML-N almost supporting extremist movements - what do they gain from it?

Are the judiciary and the Punjab Gov overtly or covertly supporting militants?

Is the evidence against MI deliberately allowed to whither away so there is not much against him?

What about the Pak Military? Are they on good terms with MI or is he against them now?

I would have never classified Bahawalpur as an extremist strong hold as most people appear quite grounded. Although when the article mentions Sheikhs hunting in the area it is clear that these visitors ar bringing their views and by building mosques free for the locals, they convert them to the sect they are.

Re: Malik Ishaq: The freed terrorist prince

Rana Sanaullah, the law minister, once was photographed in a rally with Sipahe Sahaba leaders. A lot of hue and cry was made but Sanaullah never apologized nor did he admit it as mistake. And Shahbaz Sharif kept him to the job.

Re: Malik Ishaq: The freed terrorist prince

MI was in custody since 1998, PML-N is in govt from 2008. if i am not mistaken, PML_N was thrown out of govt and country in 1999/2000 and since then it was Mushy and other "Liberals" in the govt who suppose to prosecute this terrorist??? and what did that govt did??? i remember back 1997-98, there was some big price on MI's head... so it was civilian govt who arrested him and killed many like him ( Riaz Basra comes to mind) but then it was the liberal military rule prolonged the case to the extend that the witnesses or evidences available against him have either been engineered or faded away or killed.... so whom to believe here???

Re: Malik Ishaq: The freed terrorist prince

^ because the liberal military rule liberalism was only personal and supericial..

taken from the NEWS
Held, charged, released

Release of yet another high profile accused killer, Malik Ishaq, because of ‘lack of evidence’ reveals the weak state prosecution

By Waqar Gillani

Supreme Court of Pakistan’s decision to grant Malik Muhammad Ishaq, the founding leader of Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, a bail is not surprising for those clamouring about the weakness of state’s legal and prosecution system.

It is yet another release of a high profile accused killer, who, reportedly, had confessed to his crime, but could not be sentenced because of ‘lack of evidence’.

In Pakistan, the weakness of state is exploited by hardened criminals. The acquittal of another LeJ ring leader Akram Lahori by a court in Karachi a few months back due to ‘lack of evidence’, release of the attackers of Taxila Church and Danish Embassy in Islamabad, and killers of Justice and Peace Commission activists are some of the glaring examples knocking down the legal and prosecution system of the state. Judges have been blaming the police and state prosecutors for poor investigation in such cases.

Police record reveals that during the interrogation Ishaq had confessed to 11 murders, involvement in at least 57 murders, one murder attempt and over 17 dacoities. Cases against him include attack on Iranian Consul in Multan, Khana-e-Farhang-e-Iran and killing of many police officers and government officials belonging to the Shia sect. He was charged with more than 100 murders.

Ishaq was involved in 45 criminal cases. The last charge was masterminding the attack on Sri Lankan cricket team at Liberty roundabout in Lahore in March 2009 from the jail. According to the Interior Ministry’s published report, the attackers belonging to a splinter group of LeJ wanted to kidnap the team to get Ishaq released.

Ishaq, born in 1959, is the son of Ali Ahmad Awan, who owned a cloth shop in the village Taranda Sawaey Khan in Rahim Yar Khan (RYK). Ishaq left school in sixth grade and joined his father’s cloth shop in early 1980s. Later, he started a business of distributing cigarettes in RYK until he joined SSP in 1989 — after meeting Haq Nawaz Jhangvi, the founder of SSP.

This was the time when Ishaq started his hardline religious activism from the SSP platform. The first police case was lodged against him the same year for disrupting a Muharram procession.

He formed LeJ in 1996 with his close aides Riaz Basra, Ghulam Rasool Shah, Akram Lahori and others after having differences with the SSP leadership for joining the Milli Yahkjehti Council, a political alliance of the country’s religious parties and groups including Shia groups. He was against the inclusion of Shias in the council. By now Ishaq had also developed links with militant wings of Harkatul Ansar, Harakatul Mujahideen etc.

In 1996, he managed to escape along with his aides from police custody, but was again arrested in 1997.

“We are ready to lay down our lives for the honour of the companions of the Holy Prophet (PBUH),” Ishaq, surrounded by arms-wielding supporters, said in a brief media talk after his release. “We were never terrorists and killers and the courts have also proven so,” he said claiming his ‘innocence.’

Ishaq’s lawyer, Misbahul Haq, who pleaded his bail case in the Supreme Court, says his client was acquitted in 35 cases because of ‘lack of evidence’, granted bail in seven cases and discharged in one case. He was sentenced in two cases for which he had completed his sentence. Most of the cases against Ishaq were registered in Vehari, Multan, Faisalabad, Khanewal, Jhang, and Sahiwal.

Ishaq rose to prominence after joining hands with al-Qaeda and Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) after 9/11. These militant outfits were involved in high profile terrorist strikes such as attack on Sri Lankan cricket team in Lahore, attacks on security forces in Multan, attack on Rescue 15 and ISI offices in Lahore in May 2009, attack on Moon Market, Allama Iqbal Town, Lahore, and attack on General Headquarters of Pakistan Army in Rawalpindi. Ishaq was reportedly flown from a jail in the Punjab to GHQ at the time of the GHQ attack to recognise the attackers and negotiate their surrender.

Security experts believe that PML-N’s soft corner towards such religious extremist groups might have worked for Ishaq’s release. Ahmad Ludhianvi, the chief of defunct SSP, during a media talk a year ago, had claimed he met Ishaq in jail on the request of Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif offering him (Ishaq) a conditional release if he remained peaceful for the rest of his life.

The Punjab government, reportedly, had also been giving a monthly stipend to Ishaq’s family; an act which the government claims was as per court’s order. Only that there are no court orders in sight.

[email protected]

Re: Malik Ishaq: The freed terrorist prince

what is difference between Altaf hussain and this guy???

Re: Malik Ishaq: The freed terrorist prince

The difference is that AH preys on same people (Muhajir/Urdu Speaking)by bhatta Khori, Street crimes, and now even street shooting/killing to pressurize govt, the ones who he claims to be a savior for.

Re: Malik Ishaq: The freed terrorist prince

I wonder if you watch Najam Sethi's program on Geo. he raised the same questions to Rana ji..and he had quite a satisfying answers to all this BS. hope u can dig it somewhere...

Re: Malik Ishaq: The freed terrorist prince


I am sure even army can provide "satisfying" answers as to why they provide planes to fly top terrorists from jail to "negotiate" with other terrorists when GHQ was under attack.

Re: Malik Ishaq: The freed terrorist prince

^ just take it ..i guess :)
my point was not to be an advocate for pml..but the point was..PPP wanted that leader to support their man..and when he sideded with pml this hue and cry was raised...so both sides are as much the same.
:)