Re: Malala Yousufzai attacked
Sister, I have not read a post funnier than the one you posted above. Please let us know how civilian casualty figure given by ‘Bureau of Investigative Journalism’ is not accurate and at the same time their figures are accurate (you want people to believe both at the same time). 
I do not understand why you did not read my post carefully as well as your own post carefully, before making your absurd comments full of ‘ASSUMPTIVE NONSENSE’.
Your statement “I believe”, “could be this could be that”…NONSENSE! … Make no sense, especially when I did not write anywhere what I believe on civilian casualties due to drone strikes. I only quoted figures given by ‘Bureau of Investigative Journalism’.
You questioned the figures I quoted, figures from ‘Bureau of Investigative Journalism’ mentioned in ‘Wikipedia’, and at the same time you posted an article saying that ‘Bureau of Investigative Journalism’ figures are accurate’. Is it funny or not?
Here is abstract from your post:
Maybe you did not like me referring to ‘Wikipedia’ for ‘Bureau of Investigative Journalism’ figures instead of referring them directly. So, in this post I am giving reference to actual source that would confirm quoted figures are true figures from ‘Bureau of Investigative Journalism’.
Investigative article on the subject from the website of ‘Bureau of Investigative journalism’ (from their own website): 474 out of around 3000 were civilians who got killed due to drone strikes (from 2004 to Sept 2012). Though civilian casualties could be as high as 881 (higher figure) out of 3325 (higher figure). Obviously, rest who were not civilians were terrorists and they constitute more than 80 percent of casualties.
Article on drone strike in Pakistan:
Source: The bureau of investigative journalism.
A picture of war: the CIA’s drone strikes in Pakistan: TBIJ
A picture of war: the CIA’s drone strikes in Pakistan
The Bureau has been recording every reported CIA drone strike in Pakistan. The result is our extensive database which details every known attack and the numbers killed in a covert war that has been bitterly fought since 2004.
Our detailed analysis has found that 344 strikes have killed between 2,562 and 3,325. This number includes at least 474 civilians – though the true figure maybe as high as 881.
So just what do we know? Rather than ask you to sift through thousands of lines of data, we’ve done the hard work for you – and these are the facts we’ve found:
Note: CIA claims 50 civilian death … but Bureau of Investigative Journalism claims around 474 (Min) to 881 (Max) civilians killed in drone strikes]
**Thus, Malala teacher is right … drone strike is the best revenge for what these Taliban Animals’ did to Malala and should continue. Fact is that, Taliban and their sympathisers do not like Drone attacks, as it is killing them in large numbers and striking fear in the heart of A-Q and Taliban leaderships, so they oppose and lie about drone strikes. All talks that Drone strikes is making people do suicide attacks in revenge is rubbish.If such was true than relatives of all whom Taliban killed would have become suicide attackers against Taliban and their supporters in revenge. Actually, Lanati people who do suicide attacks, their trainers, their propagators, their supports (morally as well as materially) and their sympathisers are all army of Shaitan whose abode after death would be ‘Hell fire’ InshaAllah. There should be no negotiating with them as one cannot negotiate with such animals whose presence (staying alive in any form) is dangerous to Pakistan as well as to the integrity of Islam. **