UK version of Patriot Act coming?
Newspapers warn of threat to America from ‘Londonistan’](Newspapers warn of threat to America from 'Londonistan' | Media | The Guardian)
Re: Londonistan
This article just goes to show how stupid and backward the Amerikkkan media really is calling London the hub of terrorism the mack daddy of terror in europe, they talk about so called terrorists walking the streets of London even and i quote fro NYtimes "Well known terrorist " walking around london come on how dumb can they get and this from a so called respected media newspaper, if people like this was in London they would either be under arrest or more likely they don’t even exist. 
think about it you idiots
Re: Londonistan
3000 muslims from Londonistan went through jihadi camps. I would say the likelihood of them leveraging friendly cross border protocols vis-a-vis US is quite high, to spread their disguting ideas and terrorist mandates. Insert an RFID chip in these guys and watch them day and night. :k:
Re: Londonistan
Already had it, the High Court ruled it was illegal, had it tuned down a lot.
Holding people without trial is out, tagging them or putting them under house arrest is in.
Most of this is just hyperbole by US papers, however, Given that they are run by sensationalist Americans, I wouldn’t put much stock in their stories.
I’m really proud of the BBC’s coverage of the attack. Even in the face of an attack on their own country, the BBC’s editors continued to maintain the policy of not using the t-word and BBC journalists continue to say that the attacks were done by “bombers” and not “terrorists”.
The BBC’s policy is that “careless use of words which carry emotional or value judgements” should be avoided and that “the word ‘terrorist’ itself can be a barrier rather than an aid to understanding” and should be “avoided”.
Re: Londonistan
^ jihadis aren’t people..they are terrorists. Some call them animals, I just call them scum. 
Re: Londonistan
Poor, misunderstood killers. 
A bomber is “One who makes and sets off bombs”. Sorry, but that word does not do jutice to the carnage these animals cause. Terrorist is actually a kind word for these killers and is a much more accurate term than ‘bombers’
Re: Londonistan
yes, let's not compare these terrorists – indefensible as their acts are - with the humane "bombings" of Hiroshima and Nagasaki... that was just state terrorism masquerading as an act of war
Re: Londonistan
Yes, let's not. And we won't compare it to West Pakistan either.
Re: Londonistan
Err, seminole for one who did not know much about the world before 9/11, you sure do pick up fast. Do you really know what happened in west pakistan that lead to 1971 division? hey, but it serves as a nice comeback for you....
Lets not mention all the children in Iraq that died due to unsanitary conditions caused by US troops (destruction of water and sanitary main lines of Baghdad).
Re: Londonistan
Yes, and let's not talk about you supporting the re-election of the man who started the war...
What do you know of my knowledge of the world pre 9/11? The assumptions and generalizations made around here are truly amazing.
What I know about West Pakistan is that hundreds of thousands of people were murdered, and not in the name of advancing freedom around the world. So the references to Hiroshima and Nagasaki, while predictable, are irrelevant.
Re: Londonistan
But the govt. will most likely force the ID cards on the public. Also, is the ruling by High Court written in stone? No chance for a second round especially now that 50+ have perished and your PM is pointing fingers at Al Qaeda?
Re: Londonistan
5Abi...I would never name a city Londonistan...
Re: Londonistan
The ID cards would have happened anyway. Blair had enough support in the House of Parliament. The only significant opposition was in the House of Lord, which as a non-democratic entity can be legally bypassed through using the rarely-used Parliament Act in the same way that Blair used the Parliament Act to bypass the Lords’ opposition to outlawing hunting with dogs.
The government cannot appeal against the ruling about its anti-terrorism measures (well - it was actually even higher than the High Court, it was the Law Lords themselves who said Blair was acting illegally).
Re: Londonistan
Call them whatever you want to call them Danda, Jihadis are the backbone of our religion. Khalid Bin Waleed was a Jihadi , Mohammad bin Qasim was a Jihadi, Hazrat Zubair was a jihadi.
Calling jihadis terrorist shows what a jahil you are . terrorists are terrorists.
Re: Londonistan
I don't think ID cards are gonna help in stopping bomb attacks. They would definately reduce crime but not stop those higly sophisticated bombers to strike. If they can get those c4 explosives into bombs they can make fake IDs .
Re: Londonistan
^ Right. So the solution is Patriot Act. You know its coming now that its been proven that bombers were homegrown terrorists hailing from the largest Muslim minority in UK i.e the Mirpuris, i mean Pakistanis :D
Re: Londonistan
Hizbut Tahreer and Al-Mohajiroun responsible for Londistan?
Addressing his foreign audience, Musharraf said the perpetrators of London bombings of July 7 could not be called human beings. “I would like to send a message to Prime Minister Tony Blair and his government that we strongly condemn this act of terrorism in London,” said the president. He said: “We certainly have a problem which we are trying to address very strongly but England, too has a problem, which needs to be addressed”.
He said three of the four accused in the London bombings are said to be Pakistanis and the fourth one a Jamaican. "All the three Pakistanis are British nationals from Pakistani parentage. They were born, bred and educated in Britain, and if aspersion is that they were indoctrinated when they came to Pakistan, where had the Jamaican gone for his indoctrination? He said extremist organisations also exist in the United Kingdom including Hizbut Tahreer and Al-Mohajiroun. These organisations operate with full impunity and they even had the audacity to pass an edict against my life and gave sermons of hate and violence with impunity. “We are together in the fight against terrorism, we need to remain together and fight it together,” he announced.
Re: Londonistan
Passing the buck to Pakistan isn't going to help, the Pakistani jihadis are mostly village illiterates who are more concerned about implementing their backward views at home. Britain's fringe lunatics need to be addressed as our own and dealt with accordingly.
Re: Londonistan
Al qaeda is british?! :o Look man you got to take this fight global and I mean global around some oil and stuff and Pakistan won't get a look in.