Yo check this out…if there were 21 people on each team, 10 bowlers, 10 batters, 1 wicket keeper/batter
first innings, if they are batting…only the 10 batters, 1 wickie/batter go out and bat against the other teams 10 bowlers…thennn when it’s their turn to bowl…all the 10 batters come off, and the 10 bowlers go on…
i think that way u have maximum attack…and when ure batting u have 0 vulnerablity…there would be no…oh after 6 this team has no chance
my team…PAKISTAN
batting-
saeed
inzi
youhana
aamer
elahi
wasti
latif-batter/wickie
nazir
hasan raza
afridi
mohammad akram
bowlers
akram
younis
akhtar
shahid nazir
saqlain mushtaq
mustaq ahmed
arshad khan
danish kaneria
irfan fazil
azhar mehmood
abd-ur-razzaq
“There as many ideas in the minds of men and women as there are stars in the sky, it is your job to hold on to one and make it come true”
Anonymous
Yawwwnn,
This will be so boring. Game is fun as it is.
Who could predict caddick and stewart putting up a 100 partnership for the last wicket against australia? That is what makes cricket attractive and fun.
it's not boring it's 50 overs of complete cricket...with each team doing it's best...nowadays u've got batting orders that can't function properly after 5th down
"There as many ideas in the minds of men and women as there are stars in the sky, it is your job to hold on to one and make it come true"
Anonymous
50 overs, really? So you wre talking about one day cricket, I see. That's even richer.
In one day crikcet it's already a job for the bowlers to take all 10 wickets even with the tail. And the real contest between bowlers and batsmen is to score as many runs as possible and still save their wickets. If they have only 50 overs to play and 10 batsmen then there will be no contest. Just runs galore. But that's no fun.
That will be maha-boring.