Re: Lifetime Ban on GS
The banned member is being advertised with the word banned under their nick. However, the reason is not specified which gives their friends the impression that they are being banned because someone in the management has an axe to grind.
As for me thinking that you were having a bad day. There is no way to read that blog entry and your response and not come to the conclusion that you were just having a bad day. We had seen your behaviour as the director, which was exemplary, so it was a bit of a shock to see you lash out over something which wasn’t very offensive. On top of that, it was in the blogs which I thought were less moderated and more like echo chambers where like minded people re-enforce each other’s views. If a blog was offensive to people, they had the option of not going back in there.
I am saying this from an impartial POV because neither CM nor jaanwar were my pals and I hardly knew stoppit. This is a case in which we see the reason for the ban and it doesn’t sound that good. So, can you understand that for cases where it’s totally in the dark, people are skeptical?
If a member’s behaviour is so outrageous that it warrants a permanent ban, why can’t they be shamed?You don’t have to share every little detail but the jist of the offence.