Re: Lifestyle of Libs ...
I think the point I'm making is perfectly clear....
Re: Lifestyle of Libs ...
^ Ok, Let FBI come get me.
Re: Lifestyle of Libs ...
Kaleem, do me a favor... don't throw out fire bombs if you are not willing to continue the conversation when you have no answers. When you make such damning statements such as "Dems and libs are the scum of the earth and are hell bent on destroying us all", you should be willing to qualify who these "Dems and libs" really are.
And why can't you answer the question of which leaders you admire? You are so quick to demonize the ones you disagree with so it is a fair question to ask... which ones do you agree with?
I was actually hoping to have an intelligent discourse on American politics here but it doesn't seem like you are serious about it. Heck, even a blowhard like Sean Hannity doesn't throw fire bombs without answering to them. They might not be logical or humane answers, but at least he owns up to them.
Re: Lifestyle of Libs ...
Seminole, herein lies the problem... I dont see any of the current conservative leaders to be worthy of following. What I do know is that I adhere to ceratin ideas and beliefs and they happen to fall in line with some of the conservative thinking, hence the association with conservatives. If you asked me what I think about ceratin topic, I will discuss that with you.
Re: Lifestyle of Libs ...
Ok, fair enough. You are not pigeon-holed into a certain category. I respect that. No one speaks for, or agrees with all my views either. And when there are only 2 groups of anything, I don't fall into either one. Nothing in the world is that black and white. (Except maybe for pregnancy, someone can't just be just a little bit pregnant. But I don't have a uterus so that's not an issue for me.)
So instead of demonizing democratic leaders as if they represent every dem/lib and they all fall into the same 'scum of the earth' category, why don't you discuss individual issues?