ain’t this a equation with no variable..?
anyway apply kinetic gas equation and then the no-nuke-first theory,u will get the answer!![]()
that was nearly correct...just that in stead of the 5th term '646' of second row it would be 642... .
I don't get this. Why 642? :)
You are really creative and imaginative! Ha ha!
Re: Let’s Play 1 2 3…
**
![]()
**
u see , when you produce a sycograting involuting serial term sequence, the fifth term of the 2nd row should be less than the fourth term…its all in the non- proliferation treaty(art. 5.90).![]()
Re: Let's Play 1 2 3...
I still think it is 646. :)
an=2^(n-1)
Re: Let's Play 1 2 3...
Cadet - what are thinking about? :)
it’s definitely 642..
you clearly haven’t gone through the vienna convention report on rules for treatment and upholding of human rights of prisoner of war. It’s mentioned right there..![]()
Re: Let’s Play 1 2 3…
…mujhe kuch nahi aata..![]()
koi baat nahi bachchi.jaldi hi sikh jaaogi..
Re: Let's Play 1 2 3...
kon mujhe sikhayega?
Re: Let's Play 1 2 3...
meri aisi himmat kahan ki aapko sikha pau..iggle is very good at maths ans stuff..
u from bangalore?
Re: Let’s Play 1 2 3…
![]()
Re: Let's Play 1 2 3...
well,i'll leave now..have an intellectual discussion among you..
best of luck cadet..
What?!
Lostsouls - you are lost in Vienna!
Re: Let's Play 1 2 3...
Lostsouls - come back soon to solve more mathematics! :)
So what number are we on now?
Re: Let's Play 1 2 3...
*3
*
Re: Let's Play 1 2 3...
Mmm...but what number would Meena say that we are on? :)
Re: Let's Play 1 2 3...
4
Lol!
Re: Let's Play 1 2 3...
**
sorry .. was away .. back now :)
**