Let's Play 1 2 3...

ain’t this a equation with no variable..?
anyway apply kinetic gas equation and then the no-nuke-first theory,u will get the answer!:hypo:

I don't get this. Why 642? :)

You are really creative and imaginative! Ha ha!

Re: Let’s Play 1 2 3…

**
:hmmm:
**

u see , when you produce a sycograting involuting serial term sequence, the fifth term of the 2nd row should be less than the fourth term…its all in the non- proliferation treaty(art. 5.90).:snooty:

Re: Let's Play 1 2 3...

I still think it is 646. :)

an=2^(n-1)

Re: Let's Play 1 2 3...

Cadet - what are thinking about? :)

it’s definitely 642..
you clearly haven’t gone through the vienna convention report on rules for treatment and upholding of human rights of prisoner of war. It’s mentioned right there..:sahar02:

Re: Let’s Play 1 2 3…

:teary2:…mujhe kuch nahi aata..:frowning:

koi baat nahi bachchi.jaldi hi sikh jaaogi..

Re: Let's Play 1 2 3...

kon mujhe sikhayega?

Re: Let's Play 1 2 3...

meri aisi himmat kahan ki aapko sikha pau..iggle is very good at maths ans stuff..
u from bangalore?

Re: Let’s Play 1 2 3…

:yawn:

Re: Let's Play 1 2 3...

well,i'll leave now..have an intellectual discussion among you..
best of luck cadet..

What?!

Lostsouls - you are lost in Vienna!

Re: Let's Play 1 2 3...

Lostsouls - come back soon to solve more mathematics! :)

So what number are we on now?

Re: Let's Play 1 2 3...

*3
*

Re: Let's Play 1 2 3...

Mmm...but what number would Meena say that we are on? :)

Re: Let's Play 1 2 3...

4

Lol!

Re: Let's Play 1 2 3...

**
sorry .. was away .. back now :)
**