Legends of the Last Decade

LEGENDS OF THE LAST DECADE

By Tapan Joshi and Anjali Doshi

Mumbai, July 15, 2003

Between 1990 and 2003, the cricket record books were re-written many a time. Old landmarks made way for the new benchmarks, fading greats stepped down to welcome the stars who would go on to dazzle the world with their brilliance.

Then there were the raw youngsters of the 1980s who blossomed into great cricketers… players who would walk into any team of any era. An idea to put down five greatest bowlers and batsmen between 1990 and 2003 occurred after a lively debate in the CricketNext.com newsroom.

As usual, there were arguments and objections, there were personal choices and dislikes. The criteria decided was to omit those who were coming to an end of their careers by 1990, and that’s why the likes of Sir Vivian Richards, Imran Khan, Graham Gooch, Sir Richard Hadlee and India’s very own Kapil Dev only to name a few were not considered for selection even though they retired from international cricket after 1990. We have taken into account only those players who reached the peak of their careers between 1990 and 2003.

There are many outstanding players like Inzamam ul-Haq, Mohammed Azharuddin, Mark Waugh, Adam Gilchrist or ten-on-ten Anil Kumble, who have missed out. Those who are not included in this list have been great servants of their countries, but the main criteria, as mentioned before, is the players should be able to make it to any team in the world in any era. And we think these players listed below fulfil that.

CRICKETNEXT.COM’S FIVE GREATEST BOWLERS BETWEEN 1990 AND 2003

Curtly Ambrose

CURTLY AMBROSE: Menacing, intimidating, and a great, great bowler. He would have walked into the great West Indies team of the 1980s. Ambrose rarely sledged a batsman, simply because he never needed to. He had quite a temper, but it was for his sublime bowling skills that he will be remembered forever. He has ran through many a batting line-up, he has destroyed quite a few reputations and he was responsible for keeping the Windies on top till mid 1990s. As a bowler, he was almost complete. He used his height to generate awkward bounce, he had great pace and could cut the ball viciously both ways and more importantly, he never wavered from his chosen line or length. Ambrose had a mean bouncer but he used it intelligently. Truly, one of the greats of any era.

Wasim Akram

WASIM AKRAM: Hailed as the greatest left-arm fast bowler to play the game, Akram has a staggering 900-plus international wickets to his credit. At various stages in his career, he was plagued by injuries, match fixing allegations, diabetes, player revolts and the wrath of the Pakistan Cricket Board administrators. Had he enjoyed a smoother run in his career, Akram would have emerged as the highest wicket-taker in both forms of the game.

Akram had a complete command over a cricket ball. He could pitch it where he wanted, he could swing it as he pleased, and he could bowl brilliant yorkers at a great pace. He was the master of the cricket ball, the ball would obey whatever Akram wished. Ask any batsman between 1990 and 2003 to pick the five best bowlers he has played and Akram would figure in all of them.

Shane Warne

SHANE WARNE: The wizard of Oz who invigorated the art of leg-spin bowling. Warne came on the scene at a time when captains depended more or less completely on their pace bowlers to win them matches with the exception of dust bowls of India. With just one ball, his very first in the Ashes, Warne mesmerized batsman Mike Gatting, the cricket aficionados and the layman. Here was a flashy lad from Down Under giving it a real rip and having a time of his life. The super star had arrived.

Warne went on to earn, quite rightly, the tag of the greatest leg-spinner to have ever graced the grounds. Controversies and injuries have put his career back a bit, but controversies especially have, we feel, added to his aura.

Muthiah Muralitharan

MUTHIAH MURALITHARAN: The most vicious spinner of the ball the game has seen. Murali’s greatness will always be questioned because of doubts over his action. But as far as we are concerned, he is cleared by the International Cricket Council, and he has played cricket all around the globe. Whether he ‘chucks’ or not is not for us to decide. Murali is a match-winner in any form of the game, and no batsman with the exception of Brian Lara has really dominated him, including those from India who play spin best. He has added great variety to his bowling and is now a complete tweaker. His wicket-taking rate is mind-boggling as his statistics show.

Waqar Younis

WAQAR YOUNIS: Between 1992 and 1998, Waqar Younis was the most complete fast bowler in the game. He was arguably the fastest bowler in the world then, he had perfected the art of reverse swing, and he was feared because he ‘Waqared’ batsmen by breaking their toes with crushing yorkers. In fact, so scared were the Englishmen of Waqar’s yorkers that various theories were being worked out to prevent their batsmen from ending up in hospital with broken toes.

Glenn McGrath and Allan Donald were very much at the back of our minds for the fifth spot but Waqar was more skilful. He was faster, he swung the ball more and he was more difficult to face. A batsman, given a choice of facing either Waqar or McGrath in their prime would, in all probability, opt to play the later.

CRICKETNEXT.COM’S FIVE GREATEST BATSMEN BETWEEN 1990 AND 2003

Brian Lara

BRIAN LARA: He is the highest scorer in one innings in both Tests and first-class cricket, and is ensured of a place in cricket’s Hall of Fame. But that is not the only thing about Brian Charles Lara. When in mood and form, Lara is streets ahead of his contemporaries, and that includes Sachin Tendulkar. Lara is a bigger match-winner than Tendulkar, he is more flamboyant, and he can tear apart any bowler on any surface. Ask Murali.

Lara has let himself and his admirers down time and again because of his mercurial temperament. But he has rediscovered his appetite for runs and love for the game recently, and when Lara puts his head down and gets into the thick of things, you witness magic.

Sachin Tendulkar

SACHIN TENDULKAR: A great accumulator of records, Tendulkar was acclaimed as closest to Sir Donald Bradman in terms of batting technique by the late wizard himself. We, however, feel he is just one notch below Lara in terms of pure talent and match-winning ability. Tendulkar remains one of the finest batsmen the world has seen, and his amazing temperament and humility has seen him scale peaks ordinary mortal would not even dare dream of.

In spite of attaining God-like status in India, Tendulkar has remained modest and that has helped him in his game. As a batsman, he is a treat to watch when he lets himself go without a worry. His innings against Pakistan in the 2003 World Cup was regarding by many, including this writer, as the greatest one-day innings ever produced. He is indeed cricket’s Harry Potter.

Martin Crowe

MARTIN CROWE: Eyebrows would be raised over the inclusion of the New Zealand batsman in this list, but those who have seen him smash, yes smash and not just play, Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis in bowler-friendly New Zealand conditions in the mid-90s would vouch for Crowe’s class. Said Akram after that hiding: “Martin Crowe to my mind is a great, great batsman. Waqar and myself were at the peak of our form, we were reverse swinging the ball tremendously, and he just came out and played us with nonchalance. He was a tremendous batsman.” He was hampered by a knee injury, but he has scored hundreds on one leg. Others may have a more impressive record than Crowe, but when it comes to facing the music in the middle, very few equaled him.

Steve Waugh

STEVE WAUGH: There would be at least 50 batsmen more talented than Stephen Waugh between 1990 and 2003, but then talent alone won’t take you anywhere. Waugh as a batsman and indeed as a cricketer symbolized grit, he represented pride, and he was driven by a passion to overcome all obstacles. Waugh was like a mountaineer who aimed to scale Mount Everest with just one leg.

His own twin Mark, in terms of talent, was streets ahead of ‘Tugga’, but as they say, if you want someone to bat for your life, call out Mr. Steve Waugh.

Matthew Hayden

MATTHEW HAYDEN: A modern great, left-handed Hayden’s career did an about turn when he toured India in 2001. Though his side lost the series, Hayden was mind-boggling. After that, he just went from strength to strength in both forms of the game. He plays spin better than most of the Australians, and he is not bothered about pace. He is easily the best opening bat in the world right now, though we agree it is debatable whether he would have got into any team of any era. We think Hayden would have. In 42 Tests, he has 24 innings of over 50!

I definitly agree with this article, only exception would be Martin Crowe, he was one helluva batsman but his days in the 90s weren’t that special, I would pick someone like McGrath or Gilchrist in there.

Re: Legends of the Last Decade

[QUOTE]
I would pick someone like McGrath or Gilchrist in there.
[/QUOTE]

mcgrath a batting legend?

I agree with the bowling list but the batting list can be argued to be very incorrect. Frist of all I dont know what criteria is used to put Steve Waugh in there. As mentioned in the article Mark Waugh was way ahead of him as far as talent is concerned and Mark actually justified his talent too. Then there is DeSilva who I would think would be a good choice for that list.

As Umair said Martin Crowe was a great batsman but 90's was way to off to put Crowe in as one of the best. I mean for that matter even Miandad played in the 90's why not include him in the list. To me the top 5 batsman of 90's were

  1. Sachin Tedulkar
  2. Brian Lara
  3. Inzimam-ul-Haq
  4. Mark Waugh
  5. Arvinda DeSilva

i agree with the list wholeheartedly but i would like to replace hayden with jayasuriya. why? Jayasuriya changed the face of one-day cricket by explosive opening. I think the all-around-hitting technique employed by the sri lankans in the 90s was a trend setter. As for Hayden, no doubt about his dominance in present cricket but he wasnt even a name in the 90s. he has too short a tenure to be included in the best five of the decade. i think hayden needs to prove a little more to stand alongside the likes of sachin, lara, waugh et al.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by The Rainmaker: *
Jayasuriya changed the face of one-day cricket by explosive opening. I think the all-around-hitting technique employed by the sri lankans in the 90s was a trend setter
[/QUOTE]

I dont think Srilanka or Jaysuria was the pioneer of that. I am not sure who started it but I do know that Newzeland's Mark Greatbatch played this role before Srilankan's caught on to that.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by LahoriMunda: *

I dont think Srilanka or Jaysuria was the pioneer of that. I am not sure who started it but I do know that Newzeland's Mark Greatbatch played this role before Srilankan's caught on to that.
[/QUOTE]

true greatbach was hell of a slogger but to set a trend that others follow, i think one should credit the lankans for that. secondly, even if the idea was old, it worked or shall i say jayasuriya made it work. lankans won a world cup with their strength in batting (like pak won on luck ;)). again, the point is jayasuriya still deserves the spot more than hayden... may be i m not giving the right reasons, still... ;)

I agree with the bowlers, but would certainly consider either Inzi or Saeed Anwer to replace one of the bottem 3 batsmen. Saeed's injury problems hurt him, but his batting genious is unquestioned in my opinion.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by LahoriMunda: *

I dont think Srilanka or Jaysuria was the pioneer of that. I am not sure who started it but I do know that Newzeland's Mark Greatbatch played this role before Srilankan's caught on to that.
[/QUOTE]

yeah it was Mark Greatbatch in 1992 wc who used to sledge hammer the first 15 overs...He was really on a suicide mission in that wc

Coming back to the topic my bowling legends would be
1. Curtly Ambrose
2. Wasim Akram
3. Shane Warne
4. Glenn McGrath
5. Allan Donald

Batting Legends
1. Brian Charles Lara
2. Mark Waugh
3. Sachin Tendulkar
4. Aravinda De silva
5. Steve Waugh

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by elahi: *
I agree with the bowlers, but would certainly consider either Inzi or Saeed Anwer to replace one of the bottem 3 batsmen. Saeed's injury problems hurt him, but his batting genious is unquestioned in my opinion.
[/QUOTE]

I'd say saeed should replace crowe.

my list has two significant changes so far:

jayasuriya for hayden
saeed anwar for crowe

rest looks perfect. (i hope the bowler's list was not in order of rankings or i'd swap ambrose and akram)

This is lame..
How could Waqar be their instead of Walsh,Donald or Macgrath.

Similarly...
Martin Crow doesnt deserve to be there.I would rather pick Gilchirst or Inzimam. or Dravid.

Why are we all looking at one day cricket, lets talk about test cricket as well. After Lara and Tendulkar, I think Steve Waugh was the best test batsman from 90 to 2003.
He is what you call the most complete batsman.

Waqar on the other hand was way better then Donald and Walsh.

About the Lankans, it was the Lankans who introduced the slogging in the first 15 overs, but Greatbatch was just a pinch hitter.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by fair_&_balance: *
This is lame..
How could Waqar be their instead of Walsh,Donald or Macgrath.

Similarly...
Martin Crow doesnt deserve to be there.I would rather pick Gilchirst or Inzimam. or Dravid.
[/QUOTE]

Maybe you were just too young in the days Waqar dominated world batsman.
Like I said McGrath and Donald are close calls but Waqar was explosive and batsman wet their trousers after watching him bowl.

The Game Responds:

         *Matthew Hayden is a good batsman, but he just doesn't deserve to be called a legend(yet, that is). Really. People, That Is All.*

P.S: Martin Crowe owned Wasim and Waqar. He deserves to be in the list.

[QUOTE]
Originally posted by the game: *
*
The Game Responds**:

         *Matthew Hayden is a good batsman, but he just doesn't deserve to be called a legend(yet, that is). Really. People, That Is All.*

P.S: Martin Crowe owned Wasim and Waqar. He deserves to be in the list.
[/QUOTE]

Agree, Matthew Hayden is definitly more dominant then some of the batsmen in the list but we are talking about the whole decade here, Hayden came in 2000s.

I would put Jayasuriya in there.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by fair_&_balance: *
This is lame..
How could Waqar be their instead of Walsh,Donald or Macgrath.

Similarly...
Martin Crow doesnt deserve to be there.I would rather pick Gilchirst or Inzimam. or Dravid.
[/QUOTE]

for Waqar: i think the way he haunted the english batsmen (and more) in the 90s and his amazing strike rate and 400+ wickets. he kind of symbolized pace bowling in his era. walsh comes close but i think waqar has an edge over walsh in that he was 'more feared'. mcgrath is still there, he is more of a late nineties bowler while donald was amazing he doesnt have any notable achievement to his credit. my $0.02.

Rainmaker you are right on both counts. I've read that at his best Waqar was even more deadly than Wasim. His style was so athletic that this caused long term injury problems but his peak performance was exceptional
I would also agree to sub Saeed for Crowe. Saeed always performed for the biggest games. Who can forget his 194 vs India in Chennai, a unforgettable performance.

glad to see waqar in the top 5 ;)

hmm the resttttttttttt they can pretty much go to hell ......exception of LARA...it would be so tough to give him the GOD status in india if he was playing for india along TENDU!!

ALAS Tendu chokes whereas, LARA sparks ....... yet TENDU is the so called GOD.....however, i disagree as 140+ million their neighbours..:)

no andy flower???
no de silva???

and hayden :rolleyes:

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by UMAIR316: *

Maybe you were just too young in the days Waqar dominated world batsman.
Like I said McGrath and Donald are close calls but Waqar was explosive and batsman wet their trousers after watching him bowl.
[/QUOTE]

So You think Waqar was better than Walsh.
Well ist your opinion.I respect that.In the same way I expect you to respect my view.Dont need to call me young to make your point.

There is no way anyone can take Waqar out of this list. The guy ruled the early to mid 90's. One of the most feared bowlers ever played. One must have a very bad cricketing sense to take Waqar out of that list.

If anyone should go out of that list, its Shane Warne. People say record sometimes dont tell you the whole story but records do tell you some things. From 1990 on cricket was ruled by ODI's instead of Tests. So its safe to say that the bowlers in the top 5 list should be good in both forms of the game. Well Warne is hyped a little too much by the Australian media cause he is an Aussie and by the English media cause they cant play him so why not praise him more then any other spinner atleast he is the right * color*. Waqar has a good record in ODI's as well as Tests. Warne has a very good Test record but a very mediocre ODI record. He averages over 25 with an economy rate of over 4.5. Well thats not too bad by normal standards but does not come in the league of greats. Waqar's average as well as strike rate is higher then that of Shane Warne in both froms of the game.

As far as Donald and McGrath are concerned, well they dont even come close to Waqar's acheivements as far as the 90's are concerned. Donald was at his prime byt never as good and as feared as Waqar. McGrath started his golden run with the arm in the late 90's which carries even now but he can not be called a sensation of the 90's.

** WAQAR YOUNIS **




TESTS
 (including 02/01/2003)
                      M    I  NO  Runs   HS     Ave     SR 100  50   Ct  St
Batting & Fielding   87  120  21  1010   45   10.20  47.95   0   0   18   0

                      O      M     R    W    Ave   BBI    5  10    SR  Econ
Bowling            2704    516  8788  373  23.56  7-76   22   5  43.4  3.25

ONE-DAY INTERNATIONALS
 (including 04/03/2003)
                      M    I  NO  Runs   HS     Ave     SR 100  50   Ct  St
Batting & Fielding  262  139  45   969   37   10.30  67.05   0   0   35   0

                      O      M     R    W    Ave   BBI   4w  5w    SR  Econ
Bowling            2116.2  143  9919  416  23.84  7-36   14  13  30.5  4.68


** SHANE WARNE **



TESTS
 (including 29/11/2002)
                      M    I  NO  Runs   HS     Ave     SR 100  50   Ct  St
Batting & Fielding  107  146  13  2238   99   16.82  55.79   0   8   86   0

                      O      M     R    W    Ave   BBI    5  10    SR  Econ
Bowling            4979.3 1417 12624  491  25.71  8-71   23   6  60.8  2.53

ONE-DAY INTERNATIONALS
 (including 25/01/2003)
                      M    I  NO  Runs   HS     Ave     SR 100  50   Ct  St
Batting & Fielding  193  106  28  1016   55   13.02  72.00   0   1   80   0

                      O      M     R    W    Ave   BBI   4w  5w    SR  Econ
Bowling            1766.4  110  7514  291  25.82  5-33   12   1  36.4  4.25