Re: Lal Masjid Siege Thread - Operation Silence (merged)
Editorial: Lessons of Lal Masjid
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007\07\11\story_11-7-2007_pg3_1
As the Lal Masjid saga moved to its endgame on Monday, the clergy represented by Wifaqul Madaris of the Deobandi school of thought decided to split from the Musharraf government. The delegation of clerics led by the old Taliban admirer Maulana Rafi Usmani of Darul Ulum Karachi announced that it was disappointed by the way the government had reacted to their efforts to “resolve” the Lal Masjid standoff. They kept the “agreed plan” secret but the federal state minister of information Mr Tariq Azim disclosed that the government could not accept the clerical position that the abandoned seminaries of Lal Masjid be handed over to the Wifaq instead of the law.
As the troops finally broke into the seminary held by Maulana Abdur Rashid Ghazi and his foreign terrorists, the nation was agonised over what should have been done. The foremost thought, naturally, was for the women and children kept hostage by the terrorists. The media talked about it all the time; one TV channel hyped it up unfairly through old school hymns from Allama Iqbal. This had the effect of watering down the universally accepted state principle of not negotiating with terrorists in a “siege-and-hostage” situation.
A justifiable lack of trust affected all efforts at talking to the terrorists inside Jamia Hafsa. As some of the ulema and the country’s top philanthropist Abdus Sattar Edhi offered to go inside the seminary to talk to Mr Ghazi, it was realised that even a single well-known personage taken hostage by the terrorists would immediately mean defeat of the government. For instance, had Mr Edhi been taken hostage by the terrorists during negotiations, the demand for safe passage would have had to be conceded. Once safe passage was allowed, the terrorists would have gone on to commit more acts of revenge in areas where the writ of the state is already weak.
The gap between the politico-religious minded and expert opinion has been evident during the siege and will continue to dog the government in the coming days. The inmates of Lal Masjid will be lionised by some while the collateral damage in the shape of women and children killed will be pinned on the government as “criminal neglect of the life of the common man”. Other “ungoverned spaces” inside the country will step up their “revenge” actions. Already, the killing of Chinese mechanics in Peshawar — providing repairs backup to Chinese rickshaws — was a crude retaliation for what happened after the Lal Masjid vigilantes abducted some Chinese nationals in Islamabad.
The situation confronted by the government has been compared to what happened in India after the hijack of an Indian passenger airliner from Nepal in 1999. The hijackers brought the plane to Kandahar and asked for the release of three Al Qaeda terrorists from an Indian jail in return for the Indian passengers. As days rolled by with the Indian government refusing to negotiate with the hijackers, the Indian public reaction to the killing of one passenger and the unspeakable suffering of the women and children on board the plane began to inflict its toll. The Vajpayee government gave in finally and released the terrorists, not least since the plane was on foreign territory sympathetic to the hijackers (the Taliban) and an effective operation could not have been carried out. In the event, the Indian government has not forgiven itself for its mistake. The terrorists released by India went on to perpetrate history’s worst crimes. Maulana Masood Azhar headed straight for Jamia Banuria in Karachi and announced his new jihadi outfit called Jaish Muhammad. In 2001 it attacked the Indian parliament and unleashed a military standoff between India and Pakistan lasting for nearly one year. The same year Umar Sheikh took part in the planning of the 9/11 terrorist acts in the United States, acting as the funnel for the funds that went from Al Qaeda to the hijackers in the United States. He was caught after he was instrumental in the kidnapping and beheading of the American journalist Daniel Pearl. Jaish, under different names, has since tried to kill President Musharraf a number of times.
The fact is that Lal Masjid was feeding ideologically into the anarchic order of Talibanisation in the Frontier and Tribal Areas. Eighty percent of the acolytes in its residential seminaries were from FATA and from the provincially administered tribal region of Malakand, Swat and Dir. Messrs Ghazi and Aziz regularly applauded the “state within the state” of the “FM radio mullah” Fazlullah of Malakand enjoying direct connections with Al Qaeda. No one paid heed to this. No one registered the trend of increased Al Qaeda “appearances” in the country. Over the last six months, many Al Qaeda terrorists were caught in the country and Lal Masjid remained an ally of Al Qaeda. Significantly, the “free media” knew about it but didn’t take it to task!
Law enforcement and intelligence agencies arrested 32 Al-Qaeda activists in Pakistan from January 2007 onwards. Nasir Suleman Zakaria, an Arab and Al Qaeda member, was arrested while travelling to Balochistan from Wana (South Waziristan). Two of the 32 arrested men were German, 3 were Turkish, 2 Kyrgyz, and 5 Uzbek, all attached to the different jihadi organisations of the country. Those who advocated “safe passage” for Mr Ghazi and his terrorists wrongly believe, together with Imran Khan, that General Musharraf has “unleashed an artificial war in Pakistan to please the Americans”.
Let us be clear. No government can violate the universal principle of “no negotiation with terrorists” and live to be praised. This time around, the “free media” didn’t play its cards fairly. It was allowed to carry on its own “negotiations” with the terrorists, tacitly bending public opinion in favour of “safe passage” — one FM radio in Lahore actually recommended it — and was not able to comment objectively on the vested interest of the Wifaq clerics negotiating with the ulterior motive of grabbing the madrassa property in a city already home to 88 seminaries bristling with rejectionism. *