oh yeah? who is a mullah? care to explain? very smart idea to separate Muslims from their beliefs, but dream on. till this day people RESPECT those who have religious knowledge and preach Islam in Pakistan
everyone knows who is the enemy of Pakistan, who is the enemy of Muslims, and who is behind these killings. it is not a mystery.
propaganda will not help. you cannot cloud the truth. the enemy is known to everyone.
Reality is that Mullah-ism is ruining Pakistan, maybe it's you who is ignorant.
It's really easy to say that buddy.
Reality is that we've been brainwashed.
The Mullah is always the scapegoat because WE are weak.
We are so scared to speak the truth (if we even know the truth!)
So easy for the enemy to steer us as a group, divide and conquer they will if we don't stop our ignorance!
I just talked to a friend from Lahore. he told me that there were couple of guys who were on motor cycles, these guys kept on throwing hand grenades on various locations. and perhaps at the end of the episode blew themselves as well...
Ya ALLAH in jahilon ko aqal day.... Ameen, or meray molk per raham farmaa...
It's really easy to say that buddy.
Reality is that we've been brainwashed.
The Mullah is always the scapegoat because WE are weak.
We are so scared to speak the truth (if we even know the truth!)
So easy for the enemy to steer us as a group, divide and conquer they will if we don't stop our ignorance!
It's easy to point fingers at others. I think it's time that we should start taking responsibility for once and maybe Pakistan will get somewhere during our lifetime.
Pakistan ka matlab kia. La-ila-ha-il-lal-lah.
There are people who don't like this matlab of Pakistan. They don't like Pakistan to exist. And everyone knows who they are.
The Mullahs who didn't even want a Pakistan to begin with.
It's easy to point fingers at others. I think it's time that we should start taking responsibility for once and maybe Pakistan will get somewhere during our lifetime.
.
exactly what I said, it's easy to point fingers at the Mullah.... nothing new there.
Mullahism doesn't represent an individual or Mullahs only. Mullahism is an ideology that some Pakistanis follow. At first I thought it was only illiterate people who practice Mullahism instead of Islam, but recenlty I've been getting proven wrong over and over again.
Mullahism doesn't represent an individual or Mullahs only. Mullahism is an ideology that some Pakistanis follow. At first I thought it was only illiterate people who practice Mullahism instead of Islam, but recenlty I've been getting proven wrong over and over again.
LOL where do you guys even come up with such terms "Mullahism", wikipedia? lol :D
So, if some guy is in love with Musharaf, do we call it "Musharafism"? Or some idiot following the neckless Altaf, "Bhaism?"
Hey, can I call the secularists ignorant and jahil since they follow secularism? Which by the way is an idealogy and responsible for millions of deaths in our history. Not to mention robbing us of our morality.
I agree with you on that we should not be following any Mullah, we should be sticking to Islam. But you should come out with this on all fronts, call out the secularists n the likes.
exactly what I said, it's easy to point fingers at the Mullah.... nothing new there.
Bhai,
No one is pointing fingers for nothing.
If Gays in the West, and African tribals were engaged in unprotected sex, and as a result AIDS epidemic mushroomed.
Would you then complain if someone points fingers at Gays and African tribals and their sexual behavior?
Similarly,
Tribals and Mullahs in Pakistan have been engaged in unprotected Islamism for a while. As a result suicide bombing and anarchy has mushroomed.
Why then, you become allergic if someone mentions Mullahs name as the source. Arent't the Mullahs and Islamists the main thaikedars of Islamism in Pak?
cp stick to calling out the secularists where they need be called out. its unlikely that secularists are behind the attack. all this deflection begins to look ridiculous after a point.
Tribals and Mullahs in Pakistan have been engaged in unprotected Islamism for a while. As a result suicide bombing and anarchy has mushroomed.
Why then, you become allergic if someone mentions Mullahs name as the source. Arent't the Mullahs and Islamists the main thaikedars of Islamism in Pak?
I do not deny the fact there is a serious problem amongst the so-called religious groups. I also do not support such terrorist groups. I'm only emphasizing that fact by saying we dig much deeper than just labeling the jahil harkat as Mullahs doing. You are smart, you know how easily it is to brainwash people, on both sides.
cp stick to calling out the secularists where they need be called out. its unlikely that secularists are behind the attack. all this deflection begins to look ridiculous after a point.
Tables can be turned here too, there's always two sides to a coin. Maybe you do not agree with what I say but the fact is people like me who hold such views exist in this world, you have to live with that truth. You do not have proof (nor do I) of who's behind these attacks, all we do is believe what we read and hear. Why not change our approach and do some digging around? You know just a thought..
You dont have a point. You do not wish to support such terrorist groups, but you want to do what then? Not call what they’re doing reprehensible?
You appear to be in a bind. You cant completely defend them because you ‘dont support’ them, but you dont want them unequivocally condemned. wtf do you want then?
yes they havent claimed the attacks yet. they have claimed scores of similar attacks, the conducted a recent attack, I believe last week in Lahore and promised another set of attacks soon, and according to atleast one source they have taken credit for it. it wont matter even if they do take credit for it. because the slate is wiped clean as soon as the next bombing occurs. cause “sure they took credit for the last bombing, but what about this one? we dont know!”
but sure, do your digging around, and tell me whom amongst the secularists you think we should blame. please. you will have to concoct a fantasy, i know you have absolutely nothing. you cant turn tables, and there is only one side to this coin.
You dont have a point. You do not wish to support such terrorist groups, but you want to do what then? Not call what they're doing reprehensible?
You appear to be in a bind. You cant completely defend them because you 'dont support' them, but you dont want them unequivocally condemned. wtf do you want then?
but sure, do your digging around, and tell me whom amongst the secularists you think we should blame. please. you will have to concoct a** fantasy**, i know you have absolutely nothing. you cant turn tables, and there is only one side to this coin.
wtf do I want? I want you to take your anger out someplace else and not in this thread please.
maybe your not understanding my stance on this, I hate these groups as much as you do.
I'm not in a bind buddy, maybe you're the one with a narrow viewpoint. Telling me to concoct a fantasy to prove my point? please, it's like im debating with a American patriot..
impatience with incoherent argument yes, anger no.
if you hate these groups as much as I do, you should have no objection to them being bashed. endof.
i didnt tell you to concoct a fantasy, I told you you could only concoct a fantasy if you tried to put your money where your mouth is and tried to follow up on: Tables can be turned here too, there's always two sides to a coin. Maybe you do not agree with what I say but the fact is people like me who hold such views exist in this world, you have to live with that truth. You do not have proof (nor do I) of who's behind these attacks, all we do is believe what we read and hear. Why not change our approach and do some digging around? You know just a thought..
Hope we can catch one of these terrorist pieces of **** alive! Then we can slowly torture them to death. No solace for the dead innocents but at least the public might feel better.
