Khuda ke Liye- the hottest anti-Islamic movie in Pakistan

[zobia]

Re: Khuda ke Liye- the hottest anti-Islamic movie in Pakistan

@hareem01

This movie has nothing to do with Islam like other paki movies…

1. muslim women can’t marry a non-muslim
2. Music(vulgar and un islamic music) according to all the scholars of Islam is haram.
3. Painting living things is haram. Especially making pictures of faces of humans and animals with features.

End of Story.

Now whoever wants to follow Shoib Mansoor’s religion, its up to him/her.
And whoever wants to follow the religion of Prophet Muhammad(SAW) it is up to him/her.
Most Pakistanis are getting far from Islam day by day, and credit goes to “Enlighted” modern hypocrites as well as ignorant radical muslims in Pakistan.

have u seen the movie before passing this fatwa?
if yes then i will take ur words without ny further argument.

End of Story.

[quote=“zb7779”]

@zobia

Dear Dudette,
You missed my point. I am not saying that Music is haram or people should burn down movie theaters. I am a movie and music fan but I don’t like director’s not doing there research. All I am saying is showing that a Muslim girl is allowed to marry a non Muslim is okay in Islam is totally contradictory to Shariah and against Islam. Why couldn’t he shown that the guy was willing / incline towards Islam? Or he was so much in love that he was going to do anything including convert for the sake of her? It would have made more sense or sow that the girl is not practicing Muslim and does not believe in the religion. As a movie fan it would have satisfied me.
To your other point, I don’t understand what “feeding” has anything to do with my point. I simply said Islam is not complete without believing in the 6 articles of faith. I didn’t know it was that confusing. My apology…
Peace…
“Dude”

same goes to u, u also missed my point.
Every thing lead to one notion. sooner u understand it, easier ur life will be.

for music it depends how u r using it. if i use it to spread my belief then tell me where m i wrong?

wat initiall yjj used it for it was kinda on a haram stream (some times not all the times). since many times it provokes humanly desires.

IF ITS totally HARAM THEN Y HE Say NAAT-RASOOL PBUH, n also use beats in it.
n also ppl like Sami Yusuf, n Yusuf Islam use them.

@Sharaabi

Tab bhi yahiN hotey hai, aap Cafe se bahir to kabhiN nikley.

u r allow to see my 0.00005% contibution in Cafe. (app bhi cafe say bhar dekh leya kerain)

@Crescent,

**Zobia u happy now?
**I’d rather listen to this scholar than you, sorry but they have more knowledge in Islam. **

**i never wanted to make me happy. Ur every deed must be connected to ALLAH SWT not to humans
**
B]AS FOR MUSIC:

Allah says in the Holy Qur’an:
There are those amongst men who purchase vain speech without knowledge, to mislead from the Path of Allah and throw ridicule on (the Path). For them there is a humiliating chastisement.(Luqmân : 6)**

Ibn Kathir in his commentary of the Holy Qur’an writes under this ayah that three eminent Sahabah Abdullah bin Mas’ood, Abdullah bin Abbas, and Jabir bin Abdullah refer vain speech to mean singing. The same explanation is stated by Ikrimah, Sa’eed bin Jubair, Mujahid, Makhool, Amar bin Shu’aib, and Ali bin Buzhaimah.
Hasan al-Basri says, “This ayah was revealed pertaining to singing and musical instruments.”
(Tafsir ibn Kathir v.3 p.413 Dar al-Mufeed)

Imam Bukhari in his Sahih narrates:
There will be people from my Ummah who will seek to make lawful fornication, wearing of silk, wine and the use of musical instruments (Sahih al-Bukhari 6:303 Dar al-Fikr)

yes muzic is haram, like ny other act (drinking, Zinna, laughing as loud just to FEEL ECSTASY) only if u want to remember everything excepts for the name of ALLAH SWT.

wat initially jj used muzic for, it was haram since it provokes humanly desires.

IF ITS HARAM THEN Y HE Say NAAT-RASOOL PBUH, n also uses music beats in it.
n also ppl like Sami Yusuf, n Yusuf Islam r doing the same thing.

so its haram depending on the usage. even in the movie Shoman is not using music to captures his desires (atleast wat i heard)

**

**AS FOR PAINTINGS:
**
Nabi [sallallaahu alayhi wasallam] marched against the Makkans after their break of the treaty of Hudaybiyah. The day the Muslims were blessed with victory is known as ‘Yawmul Fath’. On this day, the Ka’abah returned to its original form, free from the pollution of the pagans (polytheists). Rasulullah [sallallaahu alayhi wasallam] saw to the destruction and removal of all the paintings and statues.

Ibn Abbaas [radhiallaahu anhu] narrates that Nabi [sallallaahu alayhi wasallam] entered the house (Ka’bah) wherein he found the picture of Maryam and Ibraaheem (alayhimus salaam). Nabi [sallallaahu alayhi wasallam] thereafter mentioned, ‘As for them, they had heard that the Angels do not enter a house contain pictures.’ (Bukhari vol.4 Hadith3351)

The above contains some important points:

1. Ibraahim (alayhimus salaam)and Maryam (alayhimus salaam)knew that picture making is forbidden.
2. Angels do not enter a house containing pictures;
3. Ibraahim (alayhimus salaam)and Maryam (alayhimus salaam)are not responsible for the pictures made of them.

In another narration, ibn Abbaas [radhiallaahu anhu] narrates, ‘When Nabi [sallallaahu alayhi wasallam] saw pictures (idols) in the Ka’bah, he did not enter till he gave a decree for their destruction. Thereafter, they were erased and Nabi [sallallaahu alayhi wasallam] saw Ibraahim and Ismail (alayhimus salaam) within divining arrows in their hands. Nabi [sallallaahu alayhi wasallam] said, ‘May Allah destroy them, I take an oath on Allah that they (Ibraahim and Ismail (alayhimus salaam)never predicted the future with diving arrows.’ (Ibid)

In another Hadith, Jaabir (alayhimus salaam) mentions that there were pictures in the Ka’bah. Nabi [sallallaahu alayhi wasallam] commanded Umar [radhiallaahu anhu] to erase them. Umar (alayhimus salaam)went with a cloth and erased them with the cloth. Nabi (alayhimus salaam)entered the Ka’bah and there were no pictures remaining. (Musnad Ahmad vol.3 Hadith396)

**Thats your proof from Islamic Sources, I’m not here to convince, but pass on the message to you, the rest is up to you.

IF you can’t comply by it, atleast UNDERSTAND that it is wrong, do not go about promoting it as Halaal, do not change the Deen of Allah swt.**
**
**

**

paintings aik terha ke nahi hoti.

i do ISLAMIC PAINTING. whereas the one ur refering is referral to shirk.
m

the art stuff u r refering to it is specifically made for idolatry same as the ppl go on mazaar’s n believe on peeri fakeeri.

disclaimer: i dont think its Shomanz word. every one who watched the movie says there is nothing like dat in the movie about muzic n painting. it is not even about muslim gal marrying no-muslim man. heroine of the movie had affection towards nonmuslim guys but it was before she moved to pakistan. in the end she lived in pakistan as social worker.

SO WATCH THE MOVIE FIRST N DONT JUST BELEIVE EVERYHTING FEED TO U BY MEDIA. THESE R THE TACTICS MEDIA USE TO PUBLICIZE THEIR AGENDA.
SHOMAN NEVER TRIED TO APPEAR ON TV TO PROVE HIS RATIONALITY UNLIKE OTHERS WHO DO TO PROVE THEIR RATIONALITY OF IRRATIONAL MATTERZ.

if u really against this movie then dont watch other hollywood, bollywood movies.
(living in Canada wont gonna make ur words work well. go back to pakistan n first BAN THE MOVIES LIKE AWARAPAN (naam say he awara).
now where r Mullahz, or ur thread on dat. WATCH THE MOVIE FIRST. there aint ny thing discuss like dat in the movie. n stop appraizing Taj Mahal, n Badshai, or Faisal mosques as well as Islamic art then as well if u really hate painting or art.