I don't know if you're just fishing for excuses, or if you're really this simple minded.
I never claimed every single Kashmiri opposes Indian occupation; but its a virtually indisputable fact that the vast majority do. Every occupation has had its local collaborators...need I remind you that the British didn't occupy India with their own soldiers; rather, they managed to build up an army of natives to do their bidding. It wasn't white European soldiers who massacred hundreds of civilians at Jalianwala Bagh...it was an army comprised almost exclusively of local Dogra, Gurkha, Pathan, and yes, even Sikh soldiers. By your logic, the fact that the British occupation of the Subcontinent was maintained by an army comprised almost exclusively of locals means that most Indians supported British rule.
I will put it as your fantassy..
British ruled when people were indifferent when people hated them they had to leave..As per your fantassy kashmir muslims hate India yet there is muslim police force doing India's bidding.. i wud not call India; bidding though I am borrowing your terminology.. IN myu book whoever it's indian army jawan or kashmiri police force jawan if they have raped they need to face the law as simple as that..
so which one it's again.. litany of lame excuses never cease do they