Kaneria Promising Much

**I like the way this guy bowl

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/ok.gif

**
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport/hi/english/cricket/newsid_1968000/1968005.stm

Danish Kaneria is in the early stages of what could be an extremely, perhaps even exceptionally, productive career.

In August 2001, then aged 21 and having played just three Test matches, he gave an interview to BBC Sport Online.

He declared he aimed to **“join the elite club of Abdul Qadir and Shane Warne.” **

At the time he had just collected a 12-wicket haul against Bangladesh.

His first two Tests had proved rather less spectacular, however.

He was remorselessly milked for easy runs by Michael Atherton and Graham Thorpe in Faisalabad and Karachi.

And the combined lack of penetration of Kaneria and Saqlain Mushtaq was one of the prime reasons why England were able to claim an unexpected 1-0 series win.

But after Kaneria’s bold claim in the aftermath of his performance in Multan, he began to show further signs of a burgeoning talent by collecting 13 further wickets in two Tests on Bangladesh soil.

At that point, he seemed to have guaranteed himself a place as the second spinner in the Pakistan side.

His leg-spin bowled with a high action neatly complemented the skiddier, quicker off-spin of Saqlain.

But neither he nor Saqlain found much response in the two Tests played in Sharjah against the West Indies.

However in the searing summer heat of Lahore, against a New Zealand side with a competent top order, it was Kaneria who put Saqlain in the shade in the second innings.

The leg-spinner came away with five for 110 in 32 overs- three more wickets than Saqlain.

Perhaps even more significantly, Saqlain bowled little more than half the number of overs that Kaneria produced.

Interestingly, Waqar Younis has often introduced Kaneria to the attack earlier than his more senior slow-bowling partner.

In the Dhaka Test in January for example, Saqlain ended up bowling rather short spells and was unable to take a wicket, while Kaneria ended up with nine wickets in the match.

Kaneria has played eight times for his country now.

And although much of his success has come against Test cricket’s weakest opposition, Bangladesh, his record compares extremely favourably against the early part of the careers of the other four leading.

Shane Warne, the finest leg-spinner in the history of the game, took 14 wickets in his first eight Tests, while Kaneria already has 38 in the same number.

**The only other highly-regarded leg-spinner in world cricket, Anil Kumble, did just as well as Kaneria in his first eight Tests, as it happens. **

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/ok.gif

But it may serve as a salutary lesson to Kaneria that Kumble is not playing for his country at the moment.

What of Muttiah Muralitharan, the brilliant off-spinner who looks certain to become the game’s most prolific wicket-taker in due course?

**He took 31 wickets in his first eight Tests, seven fewer than Kumble and Kaneria, while Saqlain had 33. **

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/ok.gif

Where Kaneria outshines all the others, however, is in the realm of five-wicket hauls.

**He already has four in his first eight Tests, with none of the others having managed more than two. **

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/ok.gif

Messrs Warne, Kumble, Muralitharan and Saqlain did not, however, have the luxury of bowling at Bangladesh so early in their careers.

He's not going anywhere..stats don't tell you everything. Kaneria had three favorable factors:

1) home ground (mostly)
2) weaker teams (mostly-England hammered him)
3) He's new.

Once we play Australia and aussies r able to scrutinise his techniques only then we'll see how good he is..but for now i dont regard his figures too highlly..sorry just me.

[This message has been edited by ehsan (edited May 05, 2002).]

^ agree
we would have to see him play against more competitve teams like aussis or rsa...
we can conclude that he is a good player or a high wicket taker only seeing him play good against bang and kiwi's when they are in there worst time of cricket...
we would have to see more to say he is a good player....

Danesh Kaneria is a really good bowler, the last thing I remebered he bowled really well against England.
Its not his fault that he hasn’t gotten a chance to play against good teams.
I think he can be a really good bowler for Pakistan, but he isn’t that effective in one days, but true, he might be one of those bowlers who can only take wickets in subcontinent. :coughs: (harbajhan)


[This message has been edited by ehsan (edited May 05, 2002).]

I bet Kaneria will kick Aussies and South Africans assses

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/hehe.gif

Just wait and watch

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/wink.gif

Take Your Best Shot At Me

we'll see.

He is a very good bowler in my eyes and he should play more often against good cricket teams.


WatCh youR tHoughtS; they become words.
WatCh youR wOrdS; they become actions.
WatCh youR aCtiOns; they become habits.
WatCh youR hAbiTs; they become character.
WatCh youR chaRactEr; it becomes your dEsTinY."