About the debate of US supporting TTP. I will acknowledge that there is no proof of it can be presented for now. Are they doing it? I don't know. But one thing is for certain. They way NATO has conducted and is conducting its business in Afghanistan, its impossible for Pakistan to defeat TTP.
With NATO troops not controlling the border areas, Taliban easily escape into Afghanistan and use it to attack Pak forces. If this continues no offensive against TTP will succeed.
With NATO troops not controlling the border areas, Taliban easily escape into Afghanistan and use it to attack Pak forces. If this continues no offensive against TTP will succeed.
So the Taliban's are easily escaping into Afg and not into 1000's of small/major towns of Punjabi and rest of the Pak and that is the cause of the problem?
About the debate of US supporting TTP. I will acknowledge that there is no proof of it can be presented for now. Are they doing it? I don't know. But one thing is for certain. They way NATO has conducted and is conducting its business in Afghanistan, its impossible for Pakistan to defeat TTP.
With NATO troops not controlling the border areas, Taliban easily escape into Afghanistan and use it to attack Pak forces. If this continues no offensive against TTP will succeed.
NATO has same problem that Pakistan has...open border that is impossible to control/close. The US cannot control its flat border with Mexico how can they close Pak-Afghan border with 130k troop that are spread across Afghanistan?
So the Taliban's are easily escaping into Afg and not into 1000's of small/major towns of Punjabi and rest of the Pak and that is the cause of the problem?
Not really, when the attack is from east side where will they go?
If it cannot be searched on google, it never really happened. Moulana Merck
I agree with Ehsan bhai, international media is in controlled by a select group of people.
*Rememeber Raymond Davis, no international paper published that he was a CIA contractor untill they were allowed by US to do so. * If US had not allowed the disclosure, Merck would have been arguing here that he is a diplomat.
Even the lies on Iraq war, no one talked about American role in creating militias in Iraq, the details of this war will also come after the war is over. The fact remains US cannot take on all taleban groups therefore they have to tolerate some, but if Pakistan does that its alleged that "Haqqani network is a veritable arm of ISI".
So the Taliban's are easily escaping into Afg and not into 1000's of small/major towns of Punjabi and rest of the Pak and that is the cause of the problem?
From Fata its easier for them to go to Afghanistan (as they share a long porous border) as compared to the rest of the country, same people, no army control, and a support network.
About the debate of US supporting TTP. I will acknowledge that there is no proof of it can be presented for now. Are they doing it? I don't know. But one thing is for certain. They way NATO has conducted and is conducting its business in Afghanistan, its impossible for Pakistan to defeat TTP.
maaroon ghutna phootay aankh.
This thread is about the debate of US supporting TTP. The discussion here has absolutely nothing to do with How NATO conducts raids. That is a separate discussion.
If you acknowledge that the is no proof of US supporting Taliban then that is it. The US does not support Taliban, and anyone who says this is indirectly helping Taliban.
if it is ascertained then there is no need to change the subject by bringing non-issues in the discussion.
NATO has same problem that Pakistan has...open border that is impossible to control/close. The US cannot control its flat border with Mexico how can they close Pak-Afghan border with 130k troop that are spread across Afghanistan?
I agree, but inspite of that they keep blaming Pakistan that Taliban slip into Pakistan and have been threatening hot persuits. Plus the amount of personnel employed by US to control the border are too little.
^ The border is not easy to man, but they are not willing to give the same benefit of doubt to Pakistan knowing that operations are not a long term solution to this problem. We just shift the problem from one area to others, the root cause of the issues have still not been tackled during the past 11 years.
How NATO conducts its business in Afghanistan is relevant to the discussion.
Read again. The topic says "Kamra attack" and the first post is about Pakistanis calling US behind Taliban for conducting this raid.
This has nothing to do with how NATO conducts business in Afghanistan.
This thread is about the debate of US supporting TTP. The discussion here has absolutely nothing to do with How NATO conducts raids. That is a separate discussion.
If you acknowledge that the is no proof of US supporting Taliban then that is it. The US does not support Taliban, and anyone who says this is indirectly helping Taliban.
if it is ascertained then there is no need to change the subject by bringing non-issues in the discussion.