Close on the heels of US rejecting Pakistan’s claim of India’s involvement in Baluchistan comes this claim by Afghan government.
KABUL: Afghanistan rejected on Sunday reported claims by Pakistan’s interior minister that President Hamid Karzai had admitted that ‘terrorist’ training camps in this country were operating against Pakistan.
Re: Kabul rejects Malik’s claims about terrorist camps
So Afghanistan rejects the claim, how does that exposes a lie? Did you really think Afghanistan will stand up and say yes they have terrorist camps in their country. And a govt whose writs does not run outside Kabul is hardly in a position to make such claims.
So Afghanistan rejects the claim, how does that exposes a lie? Did you really think Afghanistan will stand up and say yes they have terrorist camps in their country. And a govt whose writs does not run outside Kabul is hardly in a position to make such claims.
The lie .... Pakistani senators were briefed by the Interior minister .... he said a dossier was presented to Indian PM about India's invovlment in Baluchistan .... that claim turned a lie when Pakistani PM said that the proof WILL be provided when talks start !!!!
Then he made the "claim" that he had informed Afghanistan president about Indian acitivites .... again refuted by Afghan government ....... lies exposed !!!!
Re: Kabul rejects Malik’s claims about terrorist camps
^ Just because you say so it does not turn into a lie, read the report again and underline where it proves that these were lies. Just because a govt with writ over kabul has said so does not make it a fact. Where does it mention the Baluchistan dossier in this report or are you reading some other report.
Re: Kabul rejects Malik’s claims about terrorist camps
Thats a wrong statement to begin with as Pakistan didnt just CLAIM but it provided PROOFs.
Then again, Karzai is a US Lap Dog and what good can be xpected from him about Pakistan.
^ Just because you say so it does not turn into a lie, read the report again and underline where it proves that these were lies. Just because a govt with writ over kabul has said so does not make it a fact. Where does it mention the Baluchistan dossier in this report or are you reading some other report.
Plain and simple english .......
Malik was also quoted as saying: ‘Karzai directed his security adviser and interior minister to destroy and close down all training camps working against Pakistan.’ Rejecting this claim, Atmar said the president had rather pledged ‘firm action’ against threats to Pakistan from Afghanistan should he receive evidence
**
The afghan president said he will take "firm action" should he recieve "evidence" ....... so what does that mean ........ that means Pakistan HAS NOT provided with any evidence regarding India's role ....
What is really shamefull .... that while claims are being made about terrorists being trained in Afghanistan ..... it is the home grown jehadis that are still the problem for Pakistan .... just a few days back 300-400 "Pakistani" boys were released from "local" terror camps ..... i wonder why they were not releaed earlier when that area has been under Pakistani control for sometime now
Re: Kabul rejects Malik’s claims about terrorist camps
So Malik has said one thing Karzai has said another or so his minister says. What you are saying is that because you believe Karzai's minister therefore a lie has been exposed. No where has the minister been able to substantiate his claim, it is he said I said situation so no lies have been exposed except for in your imagination. That is all I wanted to bring to atention. Discuss whatever you want to but dont make wild claims.
“I myself in a meeting with Afghan President Hamid Karzai in Kabul provided him proofs regarding three training camps in Afghanistan where Baloch insurgents are being provided training,”
So he gave the Afghan president proof about three training camps … but now it seems …
a question to all pakistanis why they r losing there country to these jehadis-why they r not adopting modern education system rather than maddrassas or wat evr u call today it is compared with afganistan in international scenario.