Justice With Discussions

At times when a discussion turns into an “arguement”, we sometimes tend do deviate from our sincere search of the truth regarding the topic at hand and in a way are supporting our ego specially when we reply each other personally in terms of disagreements. We sometimes feel it difficult to accept the logical arguement of our opponents without giving it an honest thought if they make sense or sound logical or not, due to which unfortunately the topics suffer and some readers might lose interest in reading them.

We do have disagreements and the two sides of the coin is what actually makes the topic interesting, but not if it goes on and on in a topic specially when we feel that we have lost track of the true purpose for which the topic was started at the first place.

**What according to you could be ways to not let our ego come in the way during discussions so that we are able to do justice with the topic at hand and continue our sincere and honest search for the truth ?

The purpose is a general understanding, learning and *sharing *our views with NO offense to anyone as I myself might be the culprit in few cases.

Re: Justice With Discussions

What is wrong with expressing your emotions :mad: I know that i am always right and the sole purpose of discussion is to make people miserable and plead mercy and accept their fault.

Whats wrong if i want to be in a win win situation all the time. Thats because i never learned to lose.

Justice my foot :halo: We should always try to make other person feel miserable in a discussion.

Re: Justice With Discussions

Bhai, have some mercy on people like me :(