Re: Judges restoration, YES/NO? Clarification (Threads Merged)
Length of the argument does not neccsssarily mean the intellectual content of the argument…if you take out the infamous sheytani doctrine of neccessity…invented and applied only in Pakistan during the past…no legal expert in the world can validate the arguments such as these…all the calculations for 2/3 majority are unneccessary…because if the sacking of judges was legal…no act of parliament can undo it…it is up to the newly elected political forces to validate or invalidate the actions of 3rd November..as legal or ilegal.
I have already stated what I had to say on the issue…50 pages or 100 pages…I do not intend to add anything else…for me doctrine of neccessity is an evil concept..and people who believe in this concept do not believe in supremecy of law..anf if you don’t believe in supremecy of law there is no point discussing law like an expert…
It will be better to base the argument on supremecy of guns…atleast it will be honest…