JIT , Mulzam , Nawaz Shareef Haziir ho #ملزم_نوازشریف_حاضرہو

[hanibal]

Re: JIT , Mulzam , Nawaz Shareef Haziir ho #ملزم_نوازشریف_حاضرہو

@Sa1eem

Please remember and think:

After all hearings, 5 judges was suppose to give verdict on case. 2 senior most judges (future nest 2 CJs of Pakistan) thought that evidence presented in court was enough to convict Haramkhor as head of corruption mafia and Don of crime. 3 Junior judges also wrote that Haramkhor is guilty but they would like to give another chance to Haramkhor … and form JIT (joint investigation team) to investigate further.

One should remember that just like 2 judges, any one of 3 junior judges could also have convicted Haramkhor, sending him to prison, and then he would have got disqualified prisoner.

Unfortunately, Haramkhors could not come out with any thing new in front of JIT that can be used to exonerate him, and it is most likely that at least 1 of 3 junior judges could also get convinced that Haramkhor has no evidence. .. If that would happen, then judgement is obvious, Haramkhor getting convicted and possibly going to prison.

All this propaganda that … judges can do this or that … is blatantly lie. 2 senior most judges have already convicted Haramkhor of Haramkhori … and it only need 1 more (out of 3 remaining) to do the same (just like senior most 2 judges) … convict haramkhor of haramkhori.

are you for real?

2 judges convinced one more judge required? what are you smoking these days? have you got any understanding of legal proceedings??? No, none of the 5 judges were convinced!!! observation is not decision…

Sharifs maybe be guilty as charged but this JIT failed to prove it in their investogations…period!!! it is not the responsibility of the accused to produce evidence to prove himself guilty…it was JIT’s task..and for your utter disappointment they have failed miserably…

now can you please get back to work…

i maintained tgis stance since April 2016…
Financial crimes are hardest nut to crack and Proceedings have proved me right…