Javed: Sudhar jaa !!!!

** Inzy, Javed add fuel to fire**

MULTAN: A day after the dramatic declaration left Sachin Tendulkar stranded on 194, the debate raging around the decision showed no sign of abating.

If anything, it hotted up further, with Pakistani coach Javed Miandad and skipper Inzamam-ul Haq adding fuel to the fire.
**
“I don’t know how could they do it to Sachin. He deserved a double. After all, he has won India so many matches, the team management could have let him reach the milestone. However good a batsman is he doesn’t reach 194 everyday. Not even Sachin,” said Miandad.
**
The former Pakistan captain had once faced the same situation when he was batting on 280 in a Test match and skipper Imran Khan declared the innings.

“Six runs is a matter of 5-10 minutes, they should have let him score those runs. However good a batsman is, he doesn’t reach 194 everyday. Yes, not even Sachin.”

Miandad agreed that no one was bigger than the game, but said that such actions stay in the memory.

“These incidents shouldn’t lead to any bad feelings within the team. I don’t know what was the hurry. It was just the second day of the Test, the match wasn’t on the brink. If I were the coach, I’d have let him score those runs. They bowled 16 overs and had they let Sachin score his double ton they’d have bowled 14.”

Even for records, Miandad felt, the knock won’t be classified as a double century but only 194. “Sachin is a mature person, he’ll never speak on this. He should just move on.”

“If any of my players was in such a situation, I would have allowed him to get the double century,” chipped in Inzamam. Innocent sympathy or a mischievous attempt to create disharmony within the Indian ranks? Take your pick.

In fairness to Miandad and Inzy, however, they weren’t the only ones speaking their mind.

Virtually the entire cricketing community was split on both sides of the great declaration divide.

Former India spinner Sunil Joshi was among those who defended the decision. “I think it was in the best interest of the team. Obviously Sachin will be disappointed, but then knowing him very well I know he’ll take it in his stride.”

Former India wicketkeeper Syed Saba Karim concurred. “The decision reflects the change in this team. Team interest will always be put before personal goals. For those former cricketers criticising the declaration because a player did not get the chance for personal glory, I can only say that reflects the way they played the game.”

Legendary spinner Erapalli Prasanna said Dravid should have waited for another two overs to give Tendulkar a chance to complete back-to-back double centuries. The Little Master had scored an unbeaten 241 in the Sydney Test against Australia early this year.

“I don’t think that the declaration was justified. Two more overs would not have made much of a difference to either our bowlers or to an eventual Indian victory,” Prasanna said in Kolkata.

The former cricketer also said Tendulkar was justified in expressing his disappointment.

“I understand that Sachin was very disappointed. I sympathise with him because to start afresh and go on to score 195 runs is in itself a huge task. His reaction was justified.”

But former captain Ajit Wadekar said Dravid took the right decision when he declared the innings at 675 for five.

“We cannot say from here what was in the mind of the team management. The Indian score was very good and had they continued batting it would have been a waste of time,” Wadekar said in Mumbai.

“Also, the Indians could have pressed for some wickets,” Wadekar said, adding that a batsman of the calibre of Tendulkar could score a double hundred any time.

“It has happened with Dravid too in the past. The decision was taken in the benefit of the team. Nobody should be disappointed with the decision,” he said.

Mohinder Amarnath, writing in The Telegraph , said: “the declaration was a good one from the captain. It must have been a difficult decision when Sachin was batting on 194, but it also shows that team interest gets precedence over any individual’s.”

I agree with Miandad. Sachin was ONLY one shot away from a double. And he didn't even get to play the last ball. I am not criticising the declaration itself but the manner it was done. It should have come at 650. But now that you have wasted 30 minutes anyway, whats the big deal in playing another over or two.

lol

i'm glad dravid put the team above tendu's personal landmarks. miandad's always been a rickshawala anyway.

oh an over or two definitely matters. ask moin khan.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by queer: *
oh an over or two definitely matters. ask moin khan.
[/QUOTE]

alternatively, you can ask Tendulkar who could've crossed 200 :p

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by funguy: *
I agree with Miandad. Sachin was ONLY one shot away from a double. And he didn't even get to play the last ball. I am not criticising the declaration itself but the manner it was done. It should have come at 650. But now that you have wasted 30 minutes anyway, whats the big deal in playing another over or two.
[/QUOTE]

FG.. tu bhi sudhar jaa. :D

I remember what you said when Indian declared.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by funguy: *

PS. However, inside I hope for a brawl breaking between Tendulkar and Dravid on this issue. :D
[/QUOTE]

I don't believe this report, not that I am saying because of Miandad fan. I just don't trust Indian media reports.

abbay oye f&b, tera maghaj hay kay compooter...abay saalay koi cheez nahee bhoolta tu.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Captain1: *

alternatively, you can ask Tendulkar who could've crossed 200 :p
[/QUOTE]

precisely dude. between tendulkar's 6 runs and moin khan's wicket, its a clear choice for india, i think.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by funguy: *
abbay oye f&b, tera maghaj hay kay compooter...abay saalay koi cheez nahee bhoolta tu.
[/QUOTE]

:D

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Pakistani Tiger: *
I don't believe this report, not that I am saying because of Miandad fan. I just don't trust Indian media reports.
[/QUOTE]

Sorry Cant help. There is no Pakistani Media which covers details. Dawn still has 2 days old scorecard.

Did you happen to know that these two events are around 24 hours apart :hehe:

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by queer: *

precisely dude. between tendulkar's 6 runs and moin khan's wicket, its a clear choice for india, i think.
[/QUOTE]

May be Dravid should have walked a step slower from the pavilion to the pitch. He would have played the pull short with better timing.

Why so much fuss about Miandad and Inzi’s comments.

Aus captain Ponting said the same thing in his interview…“I WOULDN’T HAVE DECLARED IF MY BATTER WAS ON 194”](http://www.cricketnext.com/news1/next/ponting/interviews002.htm), in fact everyone is saying that.

Yes.. everyone is saying that. And yes it is controvrsial. But Javed is saying it too ffrequently. That is the point. :p.
By the way Aussies are touring Indian in October to conquer last frontier.

I agree with Ponting. It was not the second inning declaration but the FIRST innings declaration. I think Dravid did this to drive a point home. Signs of a new captain. Too emotional and trying to impress his peers. Trying to show that he has guts to make bold calls. Well, buddy you only stepped on your mate's foot. Not very nice. Just one ball man, one ball.

i never knew fg, miandad, etc were such huge fans of tendu’s stats. :hehe:

add Ricky Ponting and many others to that :expressionless: , if you really consider that “concern” as “fan”.

queer, don't try to analyze my or Miandad's feelings or intents.

Just answer yourself deep down inside. Was it fair and wise?.

I am sure one corner of your heart will say NO.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by funguy: *
queer, don't try to analyze my or Miandad's feelings or intents.

Just answer yourself deep down inside. Was it fair and wise?.

I am sure one corner of your heart will say NO.
[/QUOTE]

I agree it was a bad decisions. And I dont question it. What I am questioning is the Miandad's intention of exploiting it and attempt of creating some division in team.