Jail term for India riot witness/Perjury

This has been a very high-profile case in India …

India’s Supreme Court has issued a rare prison sentence to a woman for perjury in a high-profile murder case arising from the 2002 Gujarat religious riots.

Zahira Sheikh was the prosecution’s main witness in what came to be known as the Best Bakery trial.

The court found her guilty of lying in court. Her whereabouts are unclear.

Last month, a special court sentenced nine people to life in prison for burning 14 people to death in the notorious attack on the Best Bakery.

Zahira Sheikh has also been ordered to pay a fine of 50,000 rupees ($1,000). If she fails to pay, the court said she would have to spend another year in jail.
She has not been seen since the trial last month.

Twelve Muslims and two others were burned to death when the bakery was attacked by a Hindu mob in the Gujarati city of Baroda.

The violence was sparked by the death of 59 Hindus after allegations that a Muslim mob attacked and set fire to a train in the town of Godhra.

Eyewitnesses at the time, including Zahira Sheikh, said a Hindu mob attacked the bakery with swords and petrol bombs and burned it down.

A court in Gujarat acquitted all the accused in the original trial after Ms Sheikh retracted her testimony.

But after she said she had been threatened by local politicians, the Supreme Court ordered a retrial outside Gujarat, saying a free and fair trial was not possible in the state.

But she once again changed her testimony, alleging this time that she had been coerced by her lawyer to give forced statements in court.

A committee set up by the Supreme Court said it believed she had been bribed to turn hostile in court.

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court judges said that the “interest of the society is not to be treated with disdain”.

Zahira Sheikh’s former lawyer, Teesta Setalvad, said by changing her statement in the case, “Zahira had played with serious issues”.

More than 1,000 people, mostly Muslims, were killed in the Gujarat riots in 2002, among the worst violence India has seen since partition in 1947.

The state administration was heavily criticised for failing to prevent the violence.

The Sabarmati Express was carrying Hindu pilgrims returning from the disputed holy site at Ayodhya when it was allegedly attacked and set on fire. But last week, an inquiry conducted by the rail ministry concluded that the fire was an accident, although this view is being challenged by the main opposition BJP.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4784776.stm

Re: Jail term for India riot witness/Perjury

^whats ur point.

Re: Jail term for India riot witness/Perjury

Ayodhya link... Utter Pradesh link.... Babri Mosque link... Plenty of points unless you are interested in discussing Pakistani links only.

Re: Jail term for India riot witness/Perjury

Amorphous, is her sentence justified?

Re: Jail term for India riot witness/Perjury

Probably yes...

Re: Jail term for India riot witness/Perjury

Is her sentencing related to the events you stated in your previous post?

Re: Jail term for India riot witness/Perjury

Sadiyah, it all goes back to Uttar Pradesh (UP) and the destruction of Babri Mosque. Lucknow, Allahabad, Varanasi, also known as Benares (that saw recent blasts) and Ayodhya (where Babri Mosque was located) are all in UP - Politically a very important state of India.

Gujrat riots started when a train carrying Hindu pilgrims returning from the disputed holy site at Ayodhya (the site of Babri Mosque) was allegedly attacked and set on fire. ("But last week, an inquiry conducted by the rail ministry concluded that the fire was an accident, although this view is being challenged by the main opposition BJP.") It sparked off communal riots in which more than a 1000 people were killed, most of them Muslims. These riots are usually known as Gujrat riots, and should not be confused with the riots that ensued immediately after the destruction of Babri Mosque.

Zahira was a key witness to an incident where a Hindu mob burnt 14 people (12 Mulsims) alive. However she changed her testimony more than once citing different reasons. A local BJP leader is said to have threatened her. Some say she was bribed, while other claim that she was influenced by some NGO members. These accusations should be investigated. If there was some change in testimony, there must also have been some kind of inducement or threat. My objective here is not to question the ruling of Indian court.

But the recent blasts in Benaras should be seen in a broader context. I'm not insinuating that there is some direct link, but the links between these riots/Mumbai bombings and Babri Mosque destruction can not be ignored.

UP is also facing an election next year. So some elements there would like to turn this incident (blasts) into some kind of electoral opportunity.

Re: Jail term for India riot witness/Perjury

nothing "goes back to babri mosque" or uttar pradesh any more than it goes back to 1971 or partition or aurangzeb or bin qasim.

what are you talking about?

Re: Jail term for India riot witness/Perjury

Amorphous, interesting, thanks.

I'm sure if the lady changed her stance a number of times she must've been under great pressure. Given that even men in our socities would succumb under such situations, I can't imagine what she must've gone through. I agree the court should look into the matter in detail and try to figure out who and what was it that made her change her stance.

I remember Babri masjid was destroyed quite a while ago, but did they build a temple at it's location?

Re: Jail term for India riot witness/Perjury

i don’t think i would have charged her, but her testimony became a joke and unreliable. at one point, she started showing up to court in a mercedes. what vested interests had paid for that, i’m not sure…but it sure is shady.

there is a temple in the general compound in the vicinity of the mosque’s location - the one that was attacked last year…but not on the actual location, which is the goal for right-wing hindus. i’m not sure we will ever see any structure built on that location because of all the politics involved.

Re: Jail term for India riot witness/Perjury

Well given that a mosque was demolished and it's a disputed area, I don't think anything should be built in that area.

Re: Jail term for India riot witness/Perjury

completely agree

Re: Jail term for India riot witness/Perjury

‘Best Bakery perjurer’ surrenders](BBC NEWS | South Asia | 'Best Bakery perjurer' surrenders)

A woman sentenced to a year in prison for perjury has given herself up to a court in Mumbai (Bombay) a month after she had gone on the run.

India’s Supreme Court sentenced Zahira Sheikh to prison for perjury in a murder case arising from the 2002 Gujarat religious riots.

She was the prosecution’s main witness in what came to be known as the Best Bakery trial.

She had been found guilty of lying in court after changing her testimony. Last month, a special court sentenced nine people to life in prison for burning 14 people to death in the notorious attack on the Best Bakery.

Zahira Sheikh was ordered to pay a fine of 50,000 rupees ($1,000) on Wednesday. If she fails to pay, the court said she would have to spend another year in jail. Her whereabouts had been unknown since February’s trial.

Twelve Muslims and two others were burned to death when the bakery was attacked by a Hindu mob in the Gujarati city of Baroda.

The violence was sparked by the death of 59 Hindus on a train. Reports said the train had been set on fire by a Muslim mob in the town of Godhra.

Key witness
Eyewitnesses at the time, including Zahira Sheikh, said a Hindu mob attacked the bakery with swords and petrol bombs and burned it down.

A court in Gujarat acquitted all the accused in the original trial after Ms Sheikh retracted her testimony.

But after she said she had been threatened by local politicians, the Supreme Court ordered a retrial outside Gujarat, saying a free and fair trial was not possible in the state.

But she once again changed her testimony, alleging this time that she had been coerced by her lawyer to give forced statements in court.

A committee set up by the Supreme Court said it believed she had been bribed to turn hostile in court.

Re: Jail term for India riot witness/Perjury

Shouldn't the Indian railway also be held accountable or whoever it was who started such riots? That is because the last I read the fire (or the explosion) in the train was due to some technical malfunction.