Israel warns of threats to India

[QUOTE]
. I guess to them, the life of a Palestinian is worth more than a Pakistani Shi'a.
[/QUOTE]

To them, yes, since the Palestinian is presumptively a Sunni Muslim. It comes down to religion. Sunni Muslims deserve equal rights where they are minorities; they do not have to accord equal rights to all where they are in the majority for they are inherently superior to other groups. This is why you have Islamist groups in the West argue for equal rights when you *never *see an Islamist group in a Muslim majority nation even utter the phrase "equal rights." Can anyone name an Islamist organization that calls for equal rights for minorities? Can anyone even name a single prominent Islamist--anywhere in the Muslim world--who favors equality?

Absolutely not... Thats just the pig headed statment someone as lowly as you would make...

Spell check! LOL. The last refuge of the scoundrel in this case, happens to be refrences to spelling ...
Spell check or not, atleast I make sense.. Where is your evidence supporting you 95 percent?!?! hmm?

:rolleyes:

[QUOTE]
It took the Western World over a thousand years to reach where it is today. And its wasnt all by virtue of their own hard work.

There was LONG evolution of Western civilization, and it is STILL evolving.
The Muslim world is a completely different category, its historical narrative is still being written. Its only come out of implerialism in the past 60 years.
[/QUOTE]
Why did the West (and then East Asia and Latin America) eclipse the Islamic world in the first place? For a 1,000 years the Islamic world was ahead of the rest of the world. It was on the cutting edge of change. The West was a backwater. What happened? You are right the West is still evolving. That is why it has progressed. The Islamic world has been more or less frozen in time for quite a while. The Islamic world simply cannot adapt on the fly to the changing world because of its culture and because the dead weight of the ulema/molvis/mullahs/whatever you want to call them.

Our of imperialism? Read that statement again and think about it. How did a civilization which for a 1,000 years engaged in imperialism find itself conquered in a few centuries? What happened--what went wrong?

Imperialism is used too often as an excuse. The world's most powerful nation went from colony to world power in a little more than a century, Japan and Germany came out of occupation and devastating wars to become world powers in a few decades, look at South Korea, and look at the best example: next door India. Why has India developed better than Pakistan? They are basically the same in history, started at the same time, came out of the same colonial experience, had similar forms of government, and similar cultures. The only difference between the two is religion.

[QUOTE]
Im certain that in the last century there were many who pondered when the Americas would evolve beyond the need of kidnapping slaves.
[/QUOTE]
Yes, but American society/culture and its political system is built to allow for it to change with the times.

America is one of only two countries in the history of the world to elect an ethnic minority to its highest office. I think the US is doing fine on this issue. While it is not perfect, it is better than anywhere else in the world on this issue.

[QUOTE]
Perhaps there is a gradual change coming about but we simply cant discern their impact because the effect is felt over generations.
[/QUOTE]
Much of the movement in the Islamic world is regressive. There is no guarantee the Muslim world will change for the better. It may turn back the clock to the 9th century if Islamists succeed.

This is a Pakistani board. Why is so much ink spilled over Israel here? Why is there never any talk about Saudi Arabia, who Pakistanis love?

[QUOTE]
Your apartheid pick is moot point. Just showing a picture and saying its apartheid doesnt make it so.
[/QUOTE]
A picture says a thousand words! It is illegal for a Saudi citizen to be a non-Muslim. If a Muslim converts, they are executed. This is not a form of apartheid? Non-Muslim workers in the country cannot build churches or temples--while Saudi Arabia has spent billions around the world to build 1,500+ mosques abroad (to spread its ideology...), especially in Pakistan.

[QUOTE]
Despite their many faults, I dont see the Saudis occupying anyone elses land illegally.
[/QUOTE]
That depends on what you define as illegal. When the Saud clan took over Arabia they did it through force, not purchase or negotiation. Do you think Shia in Saudi Arabia want to be ruled by the Saudis?

[QUOTE]
As for the Minorities of my own country, I HAVE! Your making idiotic assumptions based on your own prejudices. I know MANY Ahmadis, and have met many more Christians then you ever will.. So spare me your bull. You dont know jack sh1t about me, so save this lame self righteous bs for someone else..
[/QUOTE]
Chill out. I wasn't referring to you. I was referring to Pakistanis in general.

[QUOTE]
What im saying is, we are cleaning up our own house. But if the topic is Israel, then we all have a right to speak on it.
[/QUOTE]
What I don't understand is why is Israel singled out by Pakistanis? The only explanation is Arab (read: Saudi) influence of the nation. Where were Pakistanis on Darfur?

[QUOTE]
Kashmir and India, well Kashmir is a big issue for many Pakistanis.
[/QUOTE]
Kashmir is Indian territory (forget 1947. This is a fact now and should be accepted). Why the desire to expand into it when you oppose taking other people's land? The idea is to take over and occupy it, no?

[QUOTE]
And what pray tell should we be doing to help the Shia?
[/QUOTE]
Pass legislation protecting them, eliminate terrorist groups who attack them. Why don't we ever see Jamaatis marching for the rights of religious minorities?

Med, the record speaks for itself. Where are these folks when non-Sunnis are killed? Christians intervened to help Muslims (who were fighting Christians) in the Balkans in the 90's. I've never seen Muslims come to the aid of non-Muslims being persecuted by Muslims (cough Darfur) or Sunnis help Shias being persecuted by Sunnis. Perhaps I am wrong. Can you point me to any examples of these things occurring?

That all Muslims who supoprt Palestinians do so because the want to gain some perverse favor from Arab is your assumption. Its not based on anyting other then your pwn prejudices.

Besides the fact that anyone with any heart would feel the pain of the Palestinians regardless of relgion or ethnicity, whether you like it or not, the Palestinians are Muslims and the Koran does teach us that we are one nation... Rightly or wrongly, people will obviously feel strongly about Israel. Go argue with Islam if you have problem.
For a Muslim, there is a great signifigance to Jerusalem. It is after all the holy land...

The point isnt how we have been treated by Arabs etc.

At the end of the day, support for the Palestinians is an extremely important part of the identity of many Muslims.
It has nothing to do with supoprting or not suporting Arabs.

Im proud that Pakistan does not recognize Israel. Its ethically and morally the right thing to do, regardless of whether we get anything in return for it or not.

Ok your reasoning here is so full of holes here...
First of all, what are we talking about? In what way did Western society eclipse the Muslims?
The LATIN world ! Which country are you refering too? How has the Latin world eclipsed the Muslim world? In what field?
I lived in Mexico and Belize, and neither of them was very impressive.

China was also well ahead of the Western world.. What happned there?!?!

Problem here is your jumpng all over the place. You need to be more specific.
The reason for the rise of Western Europe are many. Where do we begin?

How do you know the Muslim world has been frozen in time? And in what sense are they frozen in time? Islamic philosophy and arts have continued to grow and change.
Like I said, your vision is clouded by the fact that you can only precieve change within the narrow window of your own exsistance. But what the Muslims need is profound change. Such change does not develop over night. It develops in very small incriments over many generations.
We can look back on Western civilization and see landmarks because we see things in retrospect. But very few among the people living at the time would have recognized that something so small could have such a huge impact centuries later.

Imperialism is just one example, but to ignore it is a grave mistake. Imperialism had a huge impact.

The reason Israel gets spoken of so often is because one, Israel is a hot topic EVERYWHERE! The Middle East plays a HUGE role in global politics, and Israel is at the center of most Middle East discussions.. Second, because its the holy land, the Palestinians are fellow Muslims, and many Muslims including those on this forum feel a kinship with their fellow Muslims.

Saudia Arabia has been discussed on this forum before. You havet been here long enough to have taken part in the discussion.
How minorities should be treated in Saudia Arabia is a moot point. Whether I agree with the Saudis or not is not relevant to this topic. Suffice it to say that im not their biggest fan. But like I said, last I checked the people of Saudi are not up in arms. So unless I hear from the miserable people of Saudi myself, I cant assume your the expert.

Kashmir is NOT Indian territory, and it never will be. The idea is to allow the people of Kashmir the right to decide their own fate. Something a bleeding heart such as yourself should openly support. End of story.

Pakistan can pass all the legislation it wants and that will still not stop bigoted terrrorists... Thats a naive statement u made.

And Pakistan is fighting extremists last I checked... About time too.

[QUOTE]
That all Muslims who supoprt Palestinians do so because the want to gain some perverse favor from Arab is your assumption.
[/QUOTE]

I never said that. What I said was the Pakistani government did so because of the Arabs. Over time that trickled down to the people who adopted the government view on Israel, and this view was also influenced by Saudi influence in Pakistan.

[QUOTE]
At the end of the day, support for the Palestinians is an extremely important part of the identity of many Muslims.
[/QUOTE]

Yes and that is both hypocritical and counterproductive. For the latter, if Muslims cared more about improving their particular countries than Israel they would make more progress. Instead, especially in Arab nations, obsession with Israel sucks out all the oxygen from the country's political talk.

[QUOTE]
Im proud that Pakistan does not recognize Israel. Its ethically and morally the right thing to do, regardless of whether we get anything in return for it or not.

[/QUOTE]

China is occupying Tibet. Where are these ethics and morals regarding that? Let's face it, Pakistan's policy in Israel is based on a belief that it will help it curry favor with the Arabs.

[QUOTE]
In what way did Western society eclipse the Muslims?
[/QUOTE]

Strength, wealth, science, social development, social justice, etc.

Latin America is not great but it is, as a whole, better than the Muslim world. Brazil is rising and will probably be a world power in the coming decades. There is no Muslim country of which the same can be said.

[QUOTE]
China was also well ahead of the Western world.. What happned there?!?!
[/QUOTE]

It did not keep up with the new ideas coming out of Europe, i.e. liberty, freedom of religion.

[QUOTE]
How do you know the Muslim world has been frozen in time? And in what sense are they frozen in time?
[/QUOTE]

In many ways Muslim societies today are the same as they were centuries ago. For instance, the common feudalism and the lack of rights for women (especially in some Middle Eastern nations), the lack of minority rights, etc.

[QUOTE]
Imperialism is just one example, but to ignore it is a grave mistake. Imperialism had a huge impact.
[/QUOTE]

Certainly but imperial conquest was a consequence, not a cause of Muslim weakness. Remember, for 1,000 years it was Muslims who were the imperialists. The imperialists becoming the conquered could not have happened unless the empires declined.

[QUOTE]
Second, because its the holy land, the Palestinians are fellow Muslims, and many Muslims including those on this forum feel a kinship with their fellow Muslims.
[/QUOTE]

Israel did not occupy Jerusalem until 1967. What was Pakistan's beef with Israel before then? Ah, kinship...but what about women Muslims kill Muslims? Where was this kinship when Turkey suppressed Kurds in the late 90's?

Do research on Saudi Arabia. Pakistanis were not up in arms against the UK. Does that mean they were happy with British rule and policy?

[QUOTE]
Kashmir is NOT Indian territory, and it never will be.
[/QUOTE]

In reality it is. How do you propose that Pakistan take it?

[QUOTE]
The idea is to allow the people of Kashmir the right to decide their own fate. Something a bleeding heart such as yourself should openly support.
[/QUOTE]

Yes, but that is not feasible for India will never allow that vote.

[QUOTE]
Pakistan can pass all the legislation it wants and that will still not stop bigoted terrrorists... Thats a naive statement u made.

And Pakistan is fighting extremists last I checked... About time too.
[/QUOTE]

Legislation can reduce discrimination in employment, education, etc. just like such legislation has done elsewhere.

Pakistan is not making a full effort against terrorists. What it does is launch an offensive every now and then and then take a vacation. It has not launched an all out war to root out all the terrorist camps. The terrorists are known to be in Wazirstan. Pakistan has not evicted them from there. Are there even any Pakistani troops there right now?

I dont agree. I think it was the other way around.
And whatever reason it was, I Israels behavior has vindicated this position.

Again, there are many countries with useless preoccupations. Doesn seem to have slowed them down. America has its Cuba, China has its Taiwan.
So what?!

Im sure there are many Muslims who feel for the Tibetans aswell. Open a thread and we can discuss that issue. But on scale of priorities, Muslims will lean towards support of their own, expecially against an outsider. Its human nature to support ones own.

Latin America is perhaps RELATIVELY better off… But you havent lived anywhere in the Latin World so you base it all on your own assumptions.
Social development etc is a term that needs defining. Social development as its understood in one group is not the same as in another. So you cant really use the Western world as meter stick on which to measure such a thing, because its different per culture.
Besides this, I would say that you simply need to compare social and economic indicators of Muslim countries to their Latin American counter part.
Look at literacy for example. Even Oman has an overall literacy of 81 percent compared to 88 percent in Brazil. Not a big difference.
Economic and social indicators of many Muslims countries rate favorably with most Latin American countries.
Infact, most Muslim countries have better indicators then even India, which was another of your example of “progress.”
Check CIA fact book for an accurate accounting on such indicators.

Freedom and Liberty are issues that even the European countries themselves struggle with to this day.
Your very callous ignore the dynamics of the Muslim world. You seem to think the Western mould can fit anything. The Europeans are a very different society from Muslims. Its an unfair comparison. The dynamics that drove change in Europe were very different from those in the Muslim world.
Muslims will improve ther lot, but it will be at their own pace and in there own way.
And again the Muslims arent the only ones to have been left behind as you put it. “Progress” over the last hundreds of years has been limited to a very small corner of the world, that being Western Europe. Most of Asia, Africa, and the Middle East were left far behind. And as I said before, Muslim countries are catching up. Social and economic indicators prove this.

I disagree.. Muslims have come a long way, but you were not alive centuries ago. You dont know. Your vision is limited.
Minority rights have to be viewed on a case by case basis. Much of the so called discrimination is blown out of proportion. Some of it is real.
But in the larger context, how much worse are Muslime compared to apartheid South Africa, bigoted Ausralia, segregationist America, and ofcourse the worst of the lot, the NAZI Germany?!?! All relatively recent in Western society despite their vaunted love for human rights.

How do you know the Muslims dont support kurds?!?! I think you are confusing govt policy for the will of the people.
Perhaps in just world Turkey would be punished for her crimes. But such is the world.
In the grand scheme of things however, im glad the Pakistani govt has got it right by not supporting Israel. Atleast they choose the right side there.

You made the point about Saudi.. Not me. So you do the research and prove your point.
People protest when they are oppressed. Its the rule of thumb, andpeople have done so under far more represive regimes then the Saudis. I think you are trying to bring your own prejudices to the table in your crude assesment of Saudi society. I think there is far more complexity then you are willing to explore.
As an example, and I know this isnt the end all of all debates, but just for fun, here is a view of Saudia Arabia through the eyes of a Saudi women hosting Anthony Bourdain.


Im not saying they are perfect, far from it. But atleast have an open mind. You seem to make sweeping genralizations about so many things.

As for imperialsim, consequence or otherwise, it did exist. And whether you like it or not, its had a great impact on the developmnet of the modern Muslim world.

As for Kashmir, I dont know how we can help the Kashmiris. But we will never stop supporting them. Im sorry if im not someone who would surrender my countries self respect for some dubious notions of “progress.”

And ofcourse its not feasible for India. Why would India allow any Kashmiri the right to self determination?! Odd how you are such an apologist when it comes to India refusing human rights, but are so disgusted by Muslims!

Legislation maybe… Making laws are one thing, but enforcing them quite another. And as any African American can attest, legislation doesnt mean discrimination and prejudice disapperar..

As for the Shia. No amount of legislation will convince any extremist.

As for Waziristan.. You dont seem to know anything about the area. You naivly assume its just a walk in the park. Try to appreciate the complexity of the issue instead of seeing things as black and white.

It seems the problem with you is you refuse to take into account any of the complexities of the world, the dynamics of the Muslim world. You make general assumpations based on nothing more then you preconcieved notions, and your western fed prejudices.

The average American couldn’t care less about Cuba and only a tiny portion of the foreign policy elite’s attention is given to Cuba. It simply cannot be compared to the Pakistani obsession with India and Israel. India at least makes some sense since it is next door and because of Kashmir. Israel makes no sense.

Yeah, I see so many Muslims talking about Tibet or at Tibet rallies. Come on.

Christians bombed Christians to save Muslims–twice in the 90’s in the Balkans.

Here is a comparison based on the UN’s human development index.

The darker the green the better, the next group is yellow, the third group is orange, and the red hues are the worst with the more red in a nation the less developed it is. The map speaks for itself. Saudi Arabia is green due to oil. The only Muslim country in green on merit is Malaysia. In contrast, most of Latin America is a green and the rest is at least yellow.

India today is basically on par with Pakistan in development. However, it is accepted, at least outside of Pakistan, that India is rapidly growing and will likely become a superpower in a few decades. No one is projecting Pakistan to grow rapidly. Pakistan may not even exist in a decade if it does not assert control of its territory and evict anti-government terrorist forces.

Yes but the level of freedom and liberty in, say the US or Sweden, are far greater than that in Bangladesh or Yemen.

The Western mold has worked in the East. Look at Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Sure, there will be some local adjustments (for example even the US has differences with the “mother country” of Britain and the “sister country” of Canada) but the basic concepts remain.

What about Japan? Japan has been a world power since the late 19th century. What about the meteoric rise of the Asian tigers? South Korea was on par with Egypt in 1970; now it is is a borderline developed country and still growing rapidly while Egypt has not progressd at all.

Those areas are progressing now. Read the “Post-American World” by Indian-American Muslim Fareed Zakaria. Everyone knows China is rising, most people know India is rising (although I presume this is kept hidden as much as possible in the Pak media) but other countries are also rising, such as South Korea and Brazil. The problem is nearly every country rising at a great rate is non-Muslim.

Actually on minority rights Muslims have basically stayed the same for 1,000 years and may even have regressed in some cases (i.e. Jews). You cited Australia, America, and Germany. Yes and look at them today. America now has a black president! These countries have changed rapidly. Muslim countries have been basically frozen on the front for 1,000 years. A big problem is shariah and molvis. There is no conception of equal rights for minorities in shariah or in the minds of molvis. This is a shame because Muhammad’s Constitution of Medina did explicitly provide equal rights for minorities.

I have never heard a Muslim complain about the Kurds or Tibet. It is always Palestine, Palestine, Palestine and if the person is Pakistani, Kashmir is mentioned every now and then. More complaints are given about things like the French ban on religious symbols than Darfur. How do I know? I grew up with Muslims, went to the mosque throughout my childhood, went to numerous Pakistani community functions, etc. I still go to some functions when I am at my parent’s home on a given weekend. They talk a lot about politics and the focus is always on Israel, the US, with a little discussion of India. Maybe Pakistanis in Pakistan are different but this is what I have observed from Pakistani immigrants in the US and their offspring, along with some Arabs.

No one protested Stalin or Hitler. Does that mean Jews liked Hitler’s policies or no one in Russia objected to Stalin? Saudi Arabia does not even allow people to assemble publicly so how can a protest be organized?

Sure but its impact is overstated. It simply made the disease worse; it did not create the disease. Plus, other countries have come out of colonialism/military occupation much better than Muslim states (such as the US, Canada, Japan, Germany). Just look at Greece. It came out of Turkish imperialism and is now much more affluent than Turkey.

Kashmir is a waste of resources to prepare for a war that can never be won by Pakistan. Pakistan should give up on that. I thought you were against taking other people’s land?

I am not an apologist. I am a realist. Who is going to force India to hold a plebiscite on Kashmir? Plus, extend that logic. Would Pakistan hold plebiscites on Baluchistan or the Northwest Province? China on Tibet? Iran/Turkey/Iraq on the Kurds? Russia on Checyna and Dagestona? Georgie on South Ossetia? And so on. See why it will never happen? Even if India could somehow be forced to hold such a vote–and this cannot be done–there will not be a will to do it because of the precedent it would set.

Legislation can do a lot. 45 years ago Obama could not even be served at a restaurant in North Carolina; in 2008 he won North Carolina. That is quite a change and would not have happened without legislation. Legislation comes first, changed attitudes second.

I concede I am no expert on Wazirstan. My question is that if Pakistan cannot crush terrorists there how can it ever take Kashmir from a much more powerful and larger country?

They DON'T. Just like they don't justify Nazionist apartheid government and terrorist barbarian regime that has occupied Islam's holy land.
What's your point?

Reason:

[quote]
Criticism of Israel is fine so long as it is fair, principled criticism.
[/quote]

End apartheid system and stop terrorism.

Re: Israel warns of threats to India

So this troll dhj finally got what he wanted. The whole thread got in to mumbo jumbo. great!

Why don't you make an effort to speak out when Muslims are being murdered by other Muslims? Oh wait, you think Shi'as in Parachinar are lesser than a Palestinian right?

[quote]
End apartheid system and stop terrorism.
[/QUOTE]

Maybe you should tell Pakistanis to stop treating their minorities like dirt and cease terrorism before lecturing others. I don't like Israel, but at least you don't see Jewish mobs burn Muslims alive like Pakistani Muslims often do to Christians, and that doesn't seem to bother you at all.