isnt this blatant blasphemy by a molvi?

[ajazali]

Re: isnt this blatant blasphemy by a molvi?

@muqawwee123

what about verse number 59 about purdah in between. Any blind person can assess that only verses 60 and 61 can be connected. There is a universal law when you deal with legal matters (I believe that this verse comes under legislation as also being emphasized by Paracha). As per universally accepted laws, specific provisions override general provisions. Here the verse was about hypocrites of Medina and extending that to all people living in the world (whether during prophet’s life or today) is worst interpretation by blood thirsty Mullas. If that punishmnet was for all the people who hurt Prophet than Naoz billah, did Prophet himself went against this verse while forgiving people of Makkah at the time of conquest of Makkah.

One should take hosh ke nakhoon to portray Prophet as a war monger and egoist instead of portraying his true personality that won even enemies. With the mindset these khooni interpreter spread fasad in world, Islamd would have been long lost.

What quran says is from Allah. Sunnah is what prophet(s.a.w.) did or ordered to do.