isnt this blatant blasphemy by a molvi?

[ajazali]

Re: isnt this blatant blasphemy by a molvi?

@muqawwee123

21 and 22?

How do you see, leaving verses in between to get interpretation according to one’s agenda? Should this not be called ‘tahreef’ or equal to same action for which scholars of Bani Israel were condemned in Quran?

How come a person can interpret verses about Abu Lahab as justification to mob killing in the name of Namoos e Risalat?

How come verses of Surah e Hujrat for reverence of the Prophet can be interpreted as licence to kill people?
@Jolie keeping aside that Lahore / Karachi (good for nothing debate), I would like to listen from you how do you see twisting of verses like the videos posted in this thread?

Maybe he forgot to mention ayah number 60 but that ayah is also linked to ayah number 56. Even if you ignore ayah 56, 60 and 61 both are sufficient as it says people of madina who abused prophet (s.a.w.) were supposed to be punished.