You seem like a very confused guy!
In your post when I asked you that who is going to determine if the government/Khalifa is acting in accordance with the sharia you are demanding you said “people.” Now you are saying that collective wisdom of the peope will be based on religious doctrine. Who is going to check if collective wisdom of the people is actually according to religious doctriine. Will there be a council of molvis checking if collectively people are taking decisions according to the religious doctrine. What if people collectively take a decision which is not according to religious doctrine in the opinion of some people as you are very well aware that there are several interpretations of religious doctrines.
Again the same question. Who will decide if the collective wisdom is in accordance with religious doctrine?
Example some women don’t cover their heads in Pakistan and consider this as perfectly decent. Who is going to decide what actually the religious doctrine says as it seems you don’t trust the people now and you want it to be according to religious doctrine.
Please be kind enough to let us know this religious doctrine will be from which sect? Who has the final authority to really give the verdict that everything is actually according to religious doctrine.
I appreciate your honesty for admitting that the sharia your are prescribing is your personal sharia and not a single relgious leader in this whole wide world will agree to your idea.
In your previous post you said that every non muslim will be free to practice his religon, but it seems that you are not ready to give this right to muslims. For muslims everything they do on religious front will be controlled by the Khalifa and his government.
I am sorry I find all your postings as childish.
First you are admitting your idea of sharia in non existent in this world, you have a serious distrust for aalims, moulanas, and muftis.
Why in the world are you demanding something which is impossible to achieve. Why don’t you come out of your intellectual dishonesty and say clearly that you want a secular system with no relgious apartheid. Why do you want to create a secular system and call it sharia system.
From your postings I admire the fact that you are against the use of relgion for political gains. This is the reason that you are so much against the present day clergy. Don’t you think that by invoving relgion in to politics we will do a disservice to relgion because politics as all about disagreements.
Instead of preaching and convincing molvis, you should focus on advocating a non relgious political system. Why in the world should we take away personal liberties of people in the name of relgion and advocate a system in which relgion becomes political. Why can’t we ask people to become tolerant and keep away relgious beliefs when they indulge in politics for the sake of the honour of religion only. After all appointment of Khalifa and gaining power is politics and not relgion!!!