depite all these war talks regular new year tradtion of exchange
of nuclear installation information continues.
Its called as Dynamic Nuclear Data Exchange, don't worry we'll keep on moving the stuff all around.
on the second thought too bad india cannot fit its population in all the atomic facilities. See that's why they say "Kum bacchay khush haal gharana" :D
Re: Islamabad, Delhi exchange N-data
I don’t think both sides will exchange fair thoughts.
these are civilian nuke plants nothing to do with weapons.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by rvikz: *
these are civilian nuke plants nothing to do with weapons.
[/QUOTE]
In any case, both sides will 'keep in dark' each other as far as it is 'N-Stuff'
because we dont want isi to give instruction to hit wrong places.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by rvikz: *
because we dont want isi to give instruction to hit wrong places.
[/QUOTE]
Same thing can be said for your agencies and their agents
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by salman_2you: *
Same thing can be said for your agencies and their agents
[/QUOTE]
Correct.
Renew agreement from both sides not to attack.
Nuclear Rivals Renew Agreement not to Attack
NEW DELHI - Pakistan and India renewed an agreement not to attack each other’s nuclear facilities, shortly after Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf declared that he was ready to use atomic weapons if India had declared war last year.
The agreement accompanied an annual exchange of information on their respective nuclear establishments handed to the embassies in Delhi and Islamabad on New Year’s Day.
**The exchanges date back to the 1991 Agreement on the Prohibition of Attack Against Nuclear Installations. **
Last year the lists were similarly exchanged during the biggest military buildup along the 3550km common frontier in 15 years.
The buildup followed a December 2001 attack on India’s Parliament blamed on Pakistan-based groups fighting Indian rule in disputed Jammu and Kashmir. Pakistan, which controls a third of Kashmir and claims the rest, denied the charge.
War clouds gathered again last May after Pakistan-backed gunmen attacked a garrison in Jammu and shot 31 people including 11 women and 11 children.
But Western countries led by the United States, fearing that an India-Pakistan war could grow to a nuclear exchange, prevailed on both sides to exercise restraint and managed to defuse the crisis.
However, Musharraf said this week that Pakistan’s readiness to use atomic weapons had deterred India from war.
“I personally conveyed messages to Prime Minister Vajpayee through every international leader who came to Pakistan that if Indian troops moved a single step across the international border or the Line of Control [in Kashmir], they should not expect a conventional war from Pakistan,” Musharraf told Air Force veterans and serving military officers in Karachi.
After a 10-month standoff, India began pulling back its troops from the border and Pakistan followed.
“We defeated our enemy without going to war,” Musharraf boasted.
Meanwhile, India’s new Army chief, General Nirmal Chander Vij, who took charge on January 1, said the military was prepared to meet any challenge from Pakistan.
“We don’t have to brag about anything, but we are prepared to meet any challenge from across the border”
This is hilarious 
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Pakistani Tiger: *
[list]
"I personally conveyed messages to Prime Minister Vajpayee through every international leader who came to Pakistan that if Indian troops moved a single step across the international border or the Line of Control [in Kashmir], they should not expect a conventional war from Pakistan,"
[/QUOTE]
this must be a freudian slip! musharaf really admitted this in his speech? funny however clever you are, if your cause is wrong, the ignorance is exposed.
so this is what it means: his idea of 'personal' is through 'every visiting international leader'.
and the 'every' also exposes the desperation.
Good job musharaf!
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Jagjeevan: *
this must be a freudian slip! musharaf really admitted this in his speech? funny however clever you are, if your cause is wrong, the ignorance is exposed.
so this is what it means: his idea of 'personal' is through 'every visiting international leader'.
and the 'every' also exposes the desperation.
Good job musharaf!
[/QUOTE]
Jagjeevan,
You don't seem to understand.
Musharraf conveyed message to Vajpayee because Vajapyee doesn't agrees to talk to Musharraf either by phone or face to face. Therefore, International Media was the only choice left for message to be sent across the Eastern Border; and I'm sure International Media has given good medicine to Vajpayee as he climbed down from a hill by taking 2-month vacation.
Btw, it wasn't a speech. It was a statement. :)
you seriously believe musharaf was or is in any position to do any of the things he claims and you claim? wishful thinking at best. but I have to hand it to you - you're becoming as good a spinmeister as musharaf!
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Pakistani Tiger: *
Jagjeevan,
You don't seem to understand.
Musharraf conveyed message to Vajpayee because Vajapyee doesn't agrees to talk to Musharraf either by phone or face to face. Therefore, International Media was the only choice left for message to be sent across the Eastern Border; and I'm sure International Media has given good medicine to Vajpayee as he climbed down from a hill by taking 2-month vacation.
Btw, it wasn't a speech. It was a statement. :)
[/QUOTE]
. pt war is not good for india. for pakistan it has nothing to loose.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Jagjeevan: *
you seriously believe musharaf was or is in any position to do any of the things he claims and you claim?
[/quote]
Yes, I do. Evidence-->Vajpayee made a statement :'We are giving Pakistan two months'. From Pakistan's point, it was all hot air but no substance.
[quote]
wishful thinking at best. but I have to hand it to you - you're becoming as good a spinmeister as musharaf!
[/QUOTE]
LOL! You're not the only one here who thinks like that.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Pakistani Tiger: *
Yes, I do. Evidence-->Vajpayee made a statement :'We are giving Pakistan two months'. From Pakistan's point, it was all hot air but no substance.
LOL! You're not the only one here who thinks like that.
[/QUOTE]
pt if there are too many attacks on temples and civilians
vajpayee will be thrown out and people will get man worse than modi.
even in the west people will not tlerate more attacks on civilians.
there will be backlash
so dont keep on brag about terrorism .
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by rvikz: *
pt if there are too many attacks on temples and civilians
vajpayee will be thrown out and people will get man worse than modi.
[/quote]
Time for India to tighten-up Security.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by rvikz: *
pt war is not good for india. for pakistan it has nothing to loose.
[/QUOTE]
War is never a answer, I admit.
Btw, I was just correcting Jagjeevan. :)