Walekum Peace!
That really depends. If you knew for example that the person did not like others opening doors for them (and there are people like that) your opening a door for them would certainly not be an act of politeness.
Similarly it is all good to say that you’re trying to take care of women, but what of women who dont want to be taken care of, assuming the care also brings with it, as it often does, less palatable aspects of patriarchy?
Should women treat men like children? After all, if its just about love then women should also protect men like children.
Show me an honest man who will not love to be treated nicely when he is angry or sad with his wife? Im not sure why theres a gender difference in that particular argument.
Thats an interesting argument. Better than the child one :k:
Thats what I was saying, that if there is no Islamic injunction against your wife thumping you then we dont really have an issue. If anything this is just a recommendation on how men should thump without placing bounds on any retaliation. Which would be sensible given the propensity for men to thump much harder than women can. Which is good but seems like a far-fetched interpretation.
Once again, I dont like the children analogy. Unless you’re prepared to be treated like a child yourself (and that isnt obvious at the moment) it is certainly patronizing. In the same way some imperialists used to argue that its a good thing we have these colonies because we take care of them and treat them with kindness.
Fundamentally I think you’re a nice guy and therefore your interpretations are also couched in very nice language and have a nice spin to them. I am not sure they are very general though.