Islam and Womens rights (debate)

Salaam’

I was debating an Atheist at university and he hit me with a heck load of verses which was totally out of context. Obviously I told him the verses were out of context, however that weakened my position.
So anyway, what I am doing is looking up the verses putting them in context and then providing an explanation to them, I will need help on the explanation as I am not a Islamic scholar I cannot try to interpret them myself so am looking for someone is knowledge on this and would give an explanation I will add the explanation I find myself, also if someone could check that would be great.

OK if you need to add explanations then, please add your explanation within the “# [Explanation place holder] (+)” just after ““ and before “]” this just makes it a hold load easier for me.

The Cow

(This is the same verse in context I have the English Translation Of The Holy Qur’an by Abdullah Yusuf Ali.:slight_smile:
[Note from now on I will refer to them just as verse in context or (*2) – see footnotes (*2) right at the end for info]

Verse in context:

[Explanation place holder] (+)

Verse in context:

[Explanation place holder] (+)

Verse in context:

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

The Women

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

**The Table Spread **
19.

[Explanation place holder] (+)

Hud

[Explanation place holder] (+)

Al-Hijr
21.

[Explanation place holder] (+)

The Pilgrimage
22.

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

** Light**
24.

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

**The Clans **
27.

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

** Those Who Set the Ranks **
36.

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

**Sad **
38.

[Explanation place holder] (+)

**Smoke **
39.

[Explanation place holder] (+)

**The Mount **
40.

[Explanation place holder] (+)

** The Star **
41.

[Explanation place holder] (+)

**The Beneficent **
42.

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

**The Event **
44.

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

**Mutual Disillusion **
46.

[Explanation place holder] (+)

**Divorce **
47.

[Explanation place holder] (+)

**Banning **
48.

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

**The Ascending Stairways **
50.

[Explanation place holder] (+)

[Explanation place holder] (+)

Palm Fibre
52.

[Explanation place holder] (+)

=========
Footnotes:
(*1) – Supposedly versus taken from the Qu’ran by sceptics annotated which tell Muslims to mistreat women.
(*2) – Verses in context using the English translation of the Holy Qur’an by Abdullah Yusuf Ali.
(*3) - This means I have quoted more then one verse as it gives a broader context.

[Explanation place holder] (+) – Just a place holder to add commentary/explanation to the verse for later

(^) – This means there is a mistake here, by sceptics annotated. I.e. the verse number is wrong.
(^ - X) refers to the correct verse number where ‘X’ is the number of the actual verse.

References:
Verses out of context taken from: http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.c…women/long.html - The Sceptic’s annotated.
Yusaf Ali verses taken from: http://www.harunyahya.com/Quran_tra...ation_index.php - Harun Yahya

Re: Islam and Womens rights (debate)

If I can help you, then the following link is the COMPLETE REFERENCE to verses in the Koran Regarding Women. It is an authorized translation by Dr. Khalifa.

Its titled : Al-Neesa (Order of revelation 92, Verses 176).

Link:
http://www.submission.org/suras/sura4.htm
I guess it should help.

Re: Islam and Womens rights (debate)

:salam:
^ Reference from that site will not be held high - cuz dr. Khalifa was a kufr - the site contains many things that go against the teachings of Islam.

For Online Translation use this rather:
http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/transliteration/
:wsalam:

ps: Stomp? whats the point of this thread?

Re: Islam and Womens rights (debate)

You missed what I was saying. I said I was debating with someone and he said Islam abuses women and I said prove it and he brought those verses and referred me to that website. So what I am trying to do is to put those verses in context and provide a commentary/explanation to them.

Re: Islam and Womens rights (debate)

They are submitters. Many Sunni Muslims don’t regard Submitters to be Muslims.

Re: Islam and Womens rights (debate)

^ no Muslim considers a person to be Muslim if that person says that there is a prophet after Prophet Muhammad [PBUH].

Re: Islam and Womens rights (debate)

Why is that so ? Its quite fallicious and silly. Dr. Khalifa is a renowned person in Koran. He probably knows more Koran than all of Gupshuppies put together and those Afghan clerics who want to kill a Christian.

He is criticized by Islamic scholars, because he discovered some mathematical facts about the Koran.

These mathematical facts of Koran are interesting, and cant be coincidence:
http://www.submission.org/simple.html

Mathematical miracles in the Koran:
http://www.submission.org/miracle/

Re: Islam and Womens rights (debate)

Absolutely without following kalima one cant be a muslim.We believe in khatam e nabuwat and mohammed salahu alehay wahlahay wasalam is the last prophet of allah.

Re: Islam and Womens rights (debate)

the poor guy is trying to get some material together for a debate concerning women's rights in Islam, and youre helping him by arguing about who is muslim and who is not.

Re: Islam and Womens rights (debate)

In every debate that I held with any western man, the question of woman’s rights is raised. You ask any proof for Darwins theory, the answer comes “First, look at yourself, you donot give rights to women.” Yes, we should discuss this amd the Muslims answer this question but instead of whipping us with this question, try to answer what we ask.

Indeed, our philosophical argumentation in the past has been quite fallicious on the question of woman. I donot say it from the standpoint of some kind of liberalism though we learned a lot when we interacted with the liberal tradition of the west. But this happens and happens all the time. I donot know about Khalifa, and try to judge him only after reading his views. But one things is clear if he has to say something he has to say it from within Islamic tradition. If he doesn’t beleive in Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) he is non-Muslim. We would till like to engage with him in a dialogue but by takling him as an outsider. Furthermore, you cannot judge Quran by using science as a standard. Reason is very straightforward - Scientefic theories are no Universal Truths. They are constantly vulnerable to rejection. On the other hand, Quran consists of Universal Truths. Thus, Truth cannot be judged by something that might be closer to truth but not the truth itself. If Khalifa is trying to judge Quran scientefically, he is making a logical mistake.

I would try to explain the verses you have produced herein. It will take some time. But this explanation would not help you much because you need to have have certain degrees of empathy to understand it, which apparently you donot seem having.

Re: Islam and Womens rights (debate)

This is interesting. I'd also like to know the explanations to some of those verses.

Re: Islam and Womens rights (debate)

Hello! I asked for help. Not a discussion on it!

Re: Islam and Womens rights (debate)

U will get help. You know it is not a task that can be accomplished overnight. First of all, we shall deal with the verses dealing with the women issues. I shall present here a metaphysical theory, derived from Quran of course by a contemporary Muslim philosopher, defining the gender relationships. I would like to add some observations of my own on the topic and then we shall give explanations of the verses quoted above. By the way, it is not the first time I have come across these verse, taken out of context, from this particular website you chose.

Hopefully from tomorrow I shall start my job.

Re: Islam and Womens rights (debate)

Stomp, I’m sort of preoccupied these days. However, if you time on your hands and wish to find out more about the verses you’ve quoted, then you may want to check out www.tafsir.com

It’ll take you a while to find the tafsir for all the verses, but it’ll be worth it, insha’Allah.

Re: Islam and Womens rights (debate)

Stomp,

If this is just for the sake of discussion, I can help. Though I am myself quite busy and cannot write properly on such topics with details as I will be out of the country for the next 3 days......

But I am sure, till I come back, others can help you with this. My suggestion, take one verse at a time. It is very confusing and the discussion can derail easily...... without any proper outcome...

Lahore 981

Re: Islam and Womens rights (debate)

Actually, guys. I've found many verses which give good commentary on the verses and explanations. The problem is each explanation is pretty long, and goes beyond the scope of the topic if you get what I mean. I'll have to be typing heck loads of text, some are in PDF format, which I will have to write down.

This is going to take a very long time, at the moment I'll start it off and for each explanation, I'll add a link which will explain the verse in much greater detail. I think that will be better then just adding the explanation I think adding a separate link for the explanation will be better, if I don't do that the topic will be way too big.

Also I have to add footnotes and references, which is another headache. So I need all the help I can get.

Re: Islam and Womens rights (debate)

The website dosen’t work for me.

And yes, am going to take each verse at a time, I don’t want to make a mistake.

Re: Islam and Womens rights (debate)

How did that weaken your position? Not only are some verses out of context, many have NOTHING to do with legalities, and thus fall squarely outside the rhetoric of "rights". I mean...so Abu Lahab's wife is going to hell...boo freaking hoo...

So, step 1: cull the list to those that are actually relevant.

If anything, quoting so many verses that have nothing to do with the topic at hand shows the unthinking nature of those who you are debating with. They're already in a weakened position because of it, to the point that maybe they shouldn't be taken seriously. You should let them know, and with all due respect raise your own standards of engagement a bit.

So, let's cull the list.

Re: Islam and Womens rights (debate)

**The Cow

Quote:
And call two witness from among your men, two witnesses. And if two men be not at hand, then a man and two women.–2:282 (1)*

This particular statement in the The Holy Quran has been abused by both faithful believers and attackers from all camps. It is presented by them in a generalized form with a concluding statement that Islam considers women’s testimony to be half that of men.

The above verse does not talk about testimony in general but only presents one case basically involving financial transactions. It doesn’t state any generalization of women’s testimony being half that of men, or that two women will equal one man. If interpretation is sought, then a positive one would be that the The Holy Quran wants to protect women from being unfairly influenced or pressurized by men. As support for the woman another woman is
supplemented, so that if one errs the other reminds her.

Not to put down women in any way, but statistics show that women are more difficult as witnesses in courts of law and have been found more guilty of perjury than men. The The Holy Quran recognizes this difference in men and women, be it social or biological and corrects for it to support the woman from being manipulated. The end purpose is justice which shouldn’t offend any reasonable person.

In different circumstances however, one woman’s testimony is given more weight than one man’s testimony in the The Holy Quran, as it can override it. This case would be when a man (husband) accuses a woman (his wife) of cheating in a relationship but has no witness except his own testimony, which is against her testimony (The Holy Quran 24:6-9).

  • Islam based on the The Holy Quran which is very different to the Islam that Muslim masses believe in, gave women the right to property ownership and a voice in legal testimony centuries before such “revolutionary” ideas were even dreamed of by Europeans and their US counterparts.

http://www.answering-christianity.com/liberation.htm


The issue of two women witnesses in place of one man is the concern of the present treatise. As will become clear to the sincere and objective reader, the intellectual status of a Muslim woman is neither marred nor degraded by the commandment that if two Muslim male witnesses are not available then one Muslim male and two Muslim females should be invited to witness. Rather, this injunction is in perfect harmony with the nature and psychology of the woman as will become evident through quotations from psychologists, psychiatrists and medical research.

The passage of the Qur’an ‘Baqarah 2:282’ in which the above-mentioned requirement is made has usury, capital and debtor difficulties as its theme. Allah grants guidelines in matters relating to monetary obligations. Then business transactions are dealt with. In this section, the requirement to commit all transactions into writing is stated most emphatically (Reduce them to writing…). The section after this describes the responsibility of the scribe, or in modern parlance, the person responsible for drawing up the agreement. The following section describes the responsibility and the obligation of the person incurring the liability. The section after this explains how if the party that is liable cannot effectively draw up the contract - out of being deficient or weak mentally, or being unable to dictate - then his or her guardian should help draw out the contract and choose two suitable witnesses to observe. It must be understood that this situation arises if it is not possible for the liable party to draw out the contract by him/herself. The condition to put things into writing is still supreme.

The next section then explains that two men should be called to witness and if two men are not available (And if there are not two men…) then a man and two women. The legislation then continues and reminds most emphatically that one should not be complacent about putting all agreements into writing - no matter whether these agreements are major or minor as this is more Just in the sight of Allaah and more reliable as evidence. The passage of the Qur’aan further explains that for practical reasons it may not always be possible to commit on-the-spot agreements into writing. In this case, it is also recommended that it be witnessed. The section which follows then lays down the guidelines which should be followed in the event that no witnesses are present.

The purpose in giving the above outline is to draw attention to the fact the question of women witnesses relates, in this instance, to commercial agreements and is not a statement on their status.

A number of questions are raised when this section of the passage is read. The questions often posed include:

*- Do women have weaker memories than men ? Why should two women be needed in the place of one man ?

  • Are women inferior to men ?*

In this scientific age we can explore the significance of this legislation. A great deal has been discovered since the early days of Islaam. And each day of advancement brings about a better understanding of the the last and final revelation from the Creator, Allaah to the creation, humankind.

As women, we are aware of the cyclical psychological strains that a woman has to encounter every month. The symptoms during early pregnancy, ante-natal and post-natal depressions, the phenomenon of menopause, the physiological and psychological problems due to infertility and last but not least the psychological problems faced after miscarriage.

It is under these situations that women can experience extraordinary psychological strains giving rise to depression, lack of concentration, slow-mindedness and short term memory loss. Let us examine these episodes in a bit more detail and with medical references from the scientific world. PMT is an umbrella term for more than 140 different symptoms and there is a lot of evidence that it causes a lot of unhappiness in many women, and consequently, to their families.

http://www.answering-christianity.com/karim/why_two_women_witnesses.htm

These questions btw are very interesting, I would like to do research and see what others come up with. Unfortunately I’m also facing a busy schedule.

This is might not the best I can do, but I thought the above had some interesting ideas nonetheless.