Re: Is violence the answer?
They started it as it would be cheap substitute for fighting when compared to directly engaging the enemy(i don't have to tell who it is ;)) along with erstwhile soviet's red army. Even money for their "training" also comes from outside, so it looked like a win-win situation for your ISI from every side(no money to invest for their training and can also engage the enemy with that). After all these years, some of them have turned their guns against ..........I don't who!!. whether it is pakistan, or musharraff, or USA, or india, or afghanistan....
uch yeah whtever!!!