Is this true?

[ZeeshanParvez]

Re: Is this true?

@vroom

The ‘hadith’ these guys are quoting is fabricated, its only mentioned in sheikh an najds kitab to make his case stronger
and they know it is fabricated! so good of bin baz to say it was weak, if indeed he did say that as zeeshan says

its mentioned here between 2 mins - 3.30 mins
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-fzFLVsulI

@ZeeshanParvez

VROOM!!! Not another coconut you have quoted. That coconut accuses Muhammad ibn Abd Al-Wahhab of including this Hadith in his book and then saying that Tabraani narrated it but he didn’t???

Has the “Maulana” coconut forgotten that **Nur al-Din Ali ibn Abi Bakr ibn Sulayman, Abu al-Hasan al-Haythami (735AH 1335 – 807AH 1404) was a [Sunni](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunni) [Shafii](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shafi`i) Islamic scholar from Cairo, whose father had a shop on a desert road. He was born in the month of Rajab in 735 H. corresponding to 1335 CE. He learned the Qur’an and memorized it, and when he was a teenager, he became a disciple of a highly renowned scholar of Hadith, Abd Al-Raheem ibn Al-Hussain ibn Abd Al-Rahman, who was better known as Zain Al-Deen Al-Iraqi

also included it in his book Majma’ al-Zawa’id wa Manba’ al-Fawa’id ???

Download the book from here Volume 10**

And then turn to page 179 in your PDF and the Hadith with those wording is there glaring at you…

Was Al-Haythami who came like 400 years before Muhammad bin Abd Al-Wahhaabalso giving wrong attributions to Tabarani???

See why I tell you these sources of yours are so unreliable. First, wrong translations now this coconut?

I would have put up a screnshot but I don’t know how to add pictures here…oh boy I am soooo tired of these wrong sources…I am going to sleep…

Just a reminder of the coconut in the video you gave us!