Is this fair?

Well I believe that the ratio of the resources Punjab gets at the moment should be reduced from 52 % to say 40 %, 12 % from what Punjab is getting at the moment may be divided into the remaining provinces…the provinces should be given a limited autonomy so that they can generate their own resources, and develop on their own…thats the only way forward!!!

Here’s an article from Dawn!

http://www.dawn.com/2002/09/09/ebr3.htm

**NFC award and the demands of justice
**

By Sabihuddin Ghausi

With one stroke, decision-makers in Islamabad, have pushed out the ball from their court and have thrown it before the three provinces, Sindh, Balochistan and NWFP , to decide among themselves the distribution ratio of a ‘subvention pool’ reportedly of Rs5-6 billion size.

According to well placed sources, the three provinces have also been asked to determine the adjustment rates of this ‘subvention pool’ during the next National Finance Commission (NFC) award period of five years from 2003-04 to 2007-08.

Now it is upto Balochistan to squeeze out its share from this pool to meet the rising demands of its huge size. The NWFP will seek its share to cope with poverty and Sindh will try to get its compensation for tax collection and population influx.

All these three ‘small’ provinces of Pakistan have been agitating for last three decades before all the National Finance Commissions (NFCs) since 1974 to give due weightage to the size of province, backwardness, revenue generation and inter-provincial migration of population in the matter of allocation of resources. Since 1974, when the first NFC was formed, Sindh has been consistently demanding de-federalisation and total provincialization of sales tax in accordance with the universally accepted principle. Sales tax is essentially a local and provincial tax world over.

In its last two days session at Karachi on August 30 and 31, the NFC did take into account the position of three small provinces on distribution criteria of resources, but came out with a strange and unbelievable logic.“It was the unanimous view that such a paradigm shift could not be accomplished immediately and that the shift had to be gradual and well considered”, the NFC press release announced on August 31.
**
Population as the only criterion for resource distribution is not practised in any federation or union of states of the world except Pakistan. In India, population gets only 10 per cent weightage. Many factors, other than population, are given weightages in Australia, Canada, USA, Germany and many other federations and unions of the world.** For the last more than 30 years, the successive NFCs were informed of these arrangements and it was not for the first time these issues were raised.

The Social Policy and Development Centre (SPDC), has carried out development ranking of all the 106 districts of the country and it should not have been difficult to measure backwardness of all the provinces. The SPDC findings show that northern provinces, Punjab and NWFP, are ahead in development and two southern provinces Sindh and Balochistan are far behind.

Similarly the financial problems because of size is also open and could be estimated. So is the revenue generation capacity of the province.

The current NFC, constituted by the military government in December 1999, also heard the same demands from the three provinces. **Only Punjab’s position was that of pro status quo as it was the only province that continues to benefit from this arrangement.
**
In their wisdom, the NFC did not accommodate smaller provinces’ demands in the distribution criteria ratio but has decided to set up a ‘subvention or grant pool’. Now the three provinces are in consultation to work out the distribution ratio based on size, revenue collection and the level of backwardness of individual provinces. The sharing of the subvention is bound to create a rift among the smaller provinces. “This is how rulers divide and rule” is a cynic’s comment but conveys more than a century-long colonial experience.

Now that all initial exercises have been completed and Islamabad has finally prevailed over all the hand-picked governments of four provinces to put their signatures, there is all the reason to believe that the scheduled meeting of the NFC (Sept 16) is going to be a mere formality and resource distribution award should be public in next few weeks.

It is almost certain that the distribution ratio of the federal divisible pool will be changed to 58:42 for the federal and the provincial governments. Under the existing arrangement, the federal government after retaining 5 per cent collection charges gives 37.5 per cent from the pool to the provinces and keeps 62.5 per cent with itself.

Provinces were already given 2.5 per cent of sales tax collection by the government earlier. This share in GST was given to the provinces because Nawaz Sharif government had arbitrarily abolished octroi and zila tax. Sindh then raised a lot of noise. The government then raised the GST from 12.5 per cent to 15 per cent and offered 2.5 per cent collection to the provinces as compensation. For the last three years Sindh was literally cheated in disbursement of this compensation arrangement. It is only a few weeks ago that President General Pervez Musharraf formalised the distribution of 2.5 per cent share for the provinces. Its impact pushed up the distribution ratio for provinces from 37.5 per cent to 40 per cent plus. Allocation for subvention pool would take out about 1.5 per cent more and total provincial share would go up to 42 per cent.In last 30 years five NFCs have given awards and the coming one will be the sixth in sequence. The current NFC is expected to give award during the military rule before the elected governments take over the responsibility. Before this three NFCs also gave their awards during authoritarian and undemocratic rule.

The first NFC was constituted in 1974 and gave its award in June 1975. Mustafa Khar and Hanif Ramay as rulers of Punjab literally pressed the federal government and managed to obtain 60.25 per cent share for their province on the basis of population. Sindh’s plea to provincialize sales tax remained unheeded.

In 1979, Ghulam Ishaq Khan headed the NFC and hardly held any serious meeting. It gave its award in 1983 and changed the population ratios on the basis of 1981 controversial population census. Punjab’s population ratio was re-counted at 57.79 per cent and Sindh’s ratio was raised to 23.34 per cent.

The third NFC was formed in 1985 headed again by Ghulam Ishaq Khan. In three years time it held 9 meetings. After removal of late Junejo’s government, late Dr Mahbubul Haq became the finance minister and chaired the NFC. In July-August 1988 he tried his best to obtain the signatures of representatives of the provinces on dotted lines.

Mr Akhtar Ali Kazi was then caretaker chief minister, Javed Sultan Japanwala was finance minister and A.W. Kazi finance secretary of Sindh. All these three had the guts to say NO to government of Ziaul Haq and preferred to pass on this responsibility to the future elected government. This is the solitary example of defiance of an authoritarian government. Till this day this remains the only act of courage to withstand pressures of an authoritarian regime. The subsequent PPP government also constituted an NFC in which Dr Mahbubul Haq was a member representing Punjab. This NFC could not complete the work.

The IJI government constituted NFC in 1990 which gave its award in 1991. Sindh and Balochistan got substantial benefits as for the first time these two provinces were given royalty and excise and share on surcharges on gas and oil production. The NWFP was given royalty on hydro power. All these three provinces have serious doubts on the way the accounts are being maintained of oil and gas production and distribution and NWFP has a big claim of recovery on account of hydro power.

The 1997 NFC award given by Farooq Leghari as president,with Malik Meraj Khalid as caretaker prime minister and Shahid Javed Burki as caretaker finance minister, has proved to be the proverbial last straw on the camel’s back. This award was based on fictitious revenue figures. Total revenue generation in 2001-02, according to this award, should have been Rs1,000 billion. It is not even half of the projected revenue and hence the provinces suffered a lot.

It is in this backdrop, that the current NFC is giving its award before the elected government takes over. There are strong feelings that this award is also not based on consensus but has been dictated by the powers that be. There is already bitterness and alienation and the new award will take Islamabad still farther away from smaller provinces

There is a legitimate question. If only population has to be the criterion then let the provinces be allowed to collect all taxes in their areas of jurisdiction and pass on share on the basis of their respective population to the federal government.

There is another question. Total foreign exchange loan burden on Pakistan is $36 billion. How much has Sindh and Balochistan received from this inflow. There are unending questions with no answers.

Originally posted by zaavia:

[quote]
Karachi produces that amount of revenue, and I stand by that statement….
[/quote]

Yes you said that before. Karachi generates about 60-70% of Pakistan's GDP…. You specifically mentioned Karachi back then to obviously differentiate it from the rest, but now you are having trouble with others using that precedent. Sorry, but its to late…

[quote]
like you say that interior Sindh doesnt contribute much to the exchequer thats why it shouldnt be provided more money to them….
[/quote]

No in fact I said they are given far more from the centre than they put in. Using the precedent that you set interior Sindh, NWFP and Balochistan only contribute a mere 10% on average to the national coffers, but get a whopping 35% from the NFC award. So they get 3.5 times more than out in – that’s pretty generous if you ask me. Is that fair?

Elaborating on this point. Do you know how much Balochistan and NWFP pay into the national coffers? Is it anything close to the 19% they take from the NFC award together? From the figures quoted it does not seem to be, but maybe you can enlighten us?

[quote]
I havent denied the fact of tribalism and feudalism in the backwardness of the provinces…
[/quote]

Yes you have, by your failure to address this matter when repeatedly asked. Unequal land distribution and feudalism are the major cause of poverty in the smaller provinces, as mentioned in the ADB report I have posted. This is something which you not been able to address, let alone counter so I will ask you again and again. Note what the ADB report says – * The prevalence of an unequal land distribution system is thus a major cause of poverty, and significantly enhances vulnerability. *

While you are still trying to grasp an answer to that central question, maybe you would like to tell us which year the NFC award was set up, and by whose government? Thanks. :)

12%? So that is 4% per province now? Whoa 9 to 13% what a big jump. Now care to answer my questions on the feudal system?

Malik, whats the justification of Punjab getting 52 % of the resources at the expense of the other provinces? Can you please name one country, where similar laws are present that one province should be developed at the expense of the others. Thanks!

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by CM: *
12%? So that is 4% per province now? Whoa 9 to 13% what a big jump. Now care to answer my questions on the feudal system?
[/QUOTE]

my take on the issue of feudalism is that it will only be removed by development in the deprived areas, and that cant be possible if the provinces dont have adequate financial means...

As expected, some people just want to bury their head in the sand. However, I appreciate the posts of Zaavia and Zakk.

No one is saying that resource distribution should only be based on levels of poverty or resource generation. But it should be based on those 2 factors AND population. Everything must be taken into account. Balochistan has many natural resouces and contributes these to industry of rest of Pakistan, yet it gets back only 5.3% revenue. And then people ask, why Balochistan is so backward and dominated by feudals! IF the govnt where to give back proper revenue to the Balochistan govn5t instead of royalty fees to the sardars, things might well be better today.

In almos t every other country, the formula of distribution is not based on population only. What is so special about Pakistan that the country cannot function if Punjab stops getting its share based on popualtion only. Even if NWFP produces little overall revenue, its level of poverty and devlopment must be taken into account. And, just like states in the US have control over state taxes, provinces in Pakistan can have same responsibility. I don't understand the point in keeping all important decisions in hand of the federal govnt which we already know does not represent all of Pakistan.

However, if after all these facts and articls you still think everyone who speaks against these injustices is anti-Punjab, then I cannot really say much more. Just remember the Bengalis were also accused of being anti-Punjab and anti-Pakistan. Today they at least have control over their own financial resources, rather then having to do with measly handouts from West Pakistan. It is true what they say about freedom, it is worth dying for.

52% is justified as Punjab produces a majority of the products we export and a great deal of our industries are located there. Thus infrastructure needs to be regularly upgraded and maintained. If the same was for sindh, i would say the same. However that is not the case. Karachi as a city gets the bulk of the Sindh budget. Guess why?

Your take is sound, however you ignore the questions I post. I have one question. Why didnt the feudal lords who are in the central govt during both Bhutto's develop Sindh? Why wasnt the NFC changed during their period? Remember Bhutto created the NFC.

[quote]
*As expected, some people just want to bury their head in the sand. However, I appreciate the posts of Zaavia and Zakk.
[/quote]
*

Those who agree with your opinion arent buring their heads right? Rather they are usually illogical assumption created on inconsistant facts.

[quote]
*No one is saying that resource distribution should only be based on levels of poverty or resource generation.
[/quote]
*

Incorrect Zaavia said that. Those Sardars are also the men that attack any forms of development in the region. How can destory a system of society for the sake of development? You work with your people. You dont freaking push them around.

But Imdad in the US everybody pays taxes. In Pakistan only 1% pays taxes, those are many military and govt officials as their revenue can be controlled. However the Feudal lords in Sindh who run around in Merc's pay no taxes. Neither do any feudal lords and they have millions of dollars in cash.

Ask the leaders of Sindh why havent they helped develop Sindh. They are part of the provincial legislature. Why havent they said anything? Why hasnt the PPP taken up this issue in the past 10 years. Arent they Party for sindh?

As I have shown Punjab only gets twice what it puts in because it has 55% of the national populaton to support. But interior Sindh, NWFP and Balochistan get 3.5 times what they put into the national coffers. It is not Punjab that is getting the best of treatment, and the figures bear that out - but interior Sindh NWFP and Balochistan. Is that what you call fair? Please counter this fact if you can, because until now you have utterly failed to?

Interior Sindh, NWFP and Balochistan put in only 10% to the national coffers, yet get a whopping **35%**of the NFC award? And you are still crying unfairness? :rolleyes:

And, I am still awaiting for you to face up to the major cause of poverty in the backward areas, namely unequal land distribution and feudalism in the smaller provinces, as mentioned in the ADB report I have posted. This is something which you not been able to address, let alone counter so I will ask you again and again. Note what the ADB report says – The prevalence of an unequal land distribution system is thus a major cause of poverty, and significantly enhances vulnerability.

P.S. When was the NFC award set up, and by whose government? :slight_smile:

[QUOTE]
Originally posted by Imdad Ali:

*No one is saying that resource distribution should only be based on levels of poverty or resource generation. But it should be based on those 2 factors AND population. Everything must be taken into account. *

[/QUOTE]

Look closely at the figures that some of you have been posting, and you will see that it is. According to your very own figures Interior Sindh, NWFP and Balochistan only contribute some 10% to the national coffers, yet they get back 35% from the NFC award. Look very closely at the figures you, zaavia and others have posted and you will see. :)

The original understanding behind the 73 constitution was to after a 5 year period devolve powers to the Provinces, the NFC would more or less deal with only Federal taxes(which should be only 3 or 4 major taxes). I have an issue with the Federal government which is structured top heavy and insensitive to proper resource distribution. The worst examples are in natural resources, the Frontier and Baluchistan aren't even paid the small amounts originally promised to them for their gas and Hydel resources, to add insult to injuiry areas right around the sites of dams and gas do not have access to those resources. The equivalent would be for a farming area to be deprived of their produce at the expense of others.

Here’s another article, more technical by former Minister and respected Economist Shahid Kardar, who explains the problems of the NFC in even more detail. Credit goes to Musharraf(Hey Pakistan Tiger hope you reading this compliment of your fav general;) )and his Ministers like Shaukat Aziz and the late Umer Asghar Khan who also highlighted an issue which Malik has unintentionally brought up, that of regional disparity within provinces. Because of our leaders tendency to victimise their opponents certain areas have been deprives of regular fundng because they were under opposition control. the solution was the Provincial Finance Commission, an idea which has just taken of…as we all know their are deep disparities between areas like Peshawar and suppose Dir or Lahore and DG Khan, and these also need to be addressed.

http://www.dawn.com/2002/02/09/op.htm#2

**From the national divisible revenues the federal government first takes 5% as its charge for collecting these revenues. Under the 1996 arrangement for the balance, 62.5% goes to Islamabad, while the provinces with their 140 million people share the rest, essentially on the basis of their respective populations. The federal government takes a disproportionate share because its main role is that of a collection agent for Pakistan’s lenders, generating resources for debt servicing. **

**Whatever is left after fulfilling the debt-related obligations it spends on the military and civil bureaucracy. Resultantly, the 1996 Award has brought provincial finances to their knees. The loss suffered by them under this award was huge compared with what they would have received under the 1991 Award. In five years up to June 2002 their accumulated loss in revenues would be in excess of Rs.150 billion. **

At the same time, distribution on the basis of population alone tends to disregard factors such as the additional burden of expenditure on administration and law and order, which is considerably higher in some areas than in others.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Zakk: *
Credit goes to Musharraf(Hey Pakistan Tiger hope you reading this compliment of your fav general;)
[/quote]

Under the 1996 arrangement for the balance, 62.5% goes to Islamabad

May I Have Your Attention Please!

In 1996, the Govt. of Benazir made that arrangement ;)

Have a slap of Democracy, bhai jaan!

Malik73, I am sorry, but I have completely lost you on how you came to those conclusions. Perhaps you should present your calculations so that I can better understand your analysis. One more thing, please stop trying to separate Karachi from Sindh. I don’t play that game.

Here’s what the facts tell me. Sindh contributes 64% of ALL revenue in Pakistan. That leaves 36% revenue unaccounted for. 27% of this is contributed by Punjab. This leaves 9% contributed by NWFP and Balochistan.

In return, the federal government, which during much of Pakistan’s history has been simply an arm of Punjab, gets 60% of ALL revenue, and we already know that the center discriminates against provinces, as majority of the federally funded development projects are in Punjab. Now, out of the 40% left for the four provinces, Punjab gets 57.9%, Sindh 23.26%, NWFP 13.54%, and Balochistan 5.3%. This amount is a percentage breakdown of the amount that is reserved for the provinces. But out of the TOTAL revenue collected in Pakistan, 24.5% goes to Punjab, 9% to Sindh and the rest 6.5% divided between NWFP and Balochistan. Around 60% of total revenue of course goes to the center.

This means that out of the total 73% revenue generated by Sindh, Balochsitan and NWFP combined for Pakistan, these 3 provinces get 15.5% of total revenue back from our generous government. While 24.5% is given to Punjab in return for generating 27% of total revenue. Yes, Punjab loses about Rs 10 billion, but I’m sure it makes up for it through the special treatment the center gives it. But the smaller provinces are getting shortchanged by about Rs 230 billion.

So, please tell how you came to the conclusion that some provinces are getting 3.5 times what they contribute to the government.

An interesting discussion going on here. From time to time there are individuals with specific agendas (Mostly anti-Punjab) who come here to justify their opinions through misinterpreted statistics and faulty knowledge of economics. Although I can dig up what the WB and UNDP has to say about income inequality and wealth distribution, but I don't feel the need to as Malik has given a strong apprisal of the facts.

As far as policy is concerned, I think there should be some adjustments made, some including gas/hydel revenues as Zakk mentioned. However, if these revenues are given back to NWFP/Baluchistan they should come with stipulations of specific Human development programs, heavy handed of the federal government? yes, but having the additional revenues spent on urban/elites is not the way to go when rural areas are more backward. As for the discussion about Karach vs. Sindh in terms of revenue production..I'll introduce a new category of Urban Sindh which fits our discussion even more. Karachi, Hyderabad, and Sukkur are the powerhouses of production. Rural Sindh and Baluchistan are highly backward and it shouldn't surprise anyone that the entrenchment of Waderas/Sardars is the strongest.

I am for limited autonomy but history as well as practical observations has proven time and time again that autonomy has led to a divergance in the concept of the unified nationhood. For those brining up Western Civilization, do not forget their economic prowess at the present. Autonomy or devolution of power must be accompanied by strong checks, including stipulating proportional development in all parts of the province.

Sorry for getting off topic but I do like to remind you that the three provinces are very much fractured internally. Don't forget that development in Sindh has raised the ire of the Sindhi speakers against their Urdu speaking counterparts. In Baluchistan, the affluent Pashtoons of the Northern districts have fostered much Baluchi resentment. Whereas, NWFP's complaints come from the Northern non-Pakhtun districts and the Seraiki D.I.K districts. One common theme is that all the mentioned problems go away upon national discussion and all groups are united in blaming Punjab for the lack of development and economic growth. Step back and think for yourself, how much do want to become fractured as a nation and blame your equally deprived compatriots?

Originally posted by Imdad Ali:

[quote]
Malik73, I am sorry, but I have completely lost you on how you came to those conclusions. Perhaps you should present your calculations so that I can better understand your analysis.
[/quote]

Simple, from the very figures you and others have been bandying about, of course.

  • You say Sindh as a whole contributes 64% of total tax revenues.

  • zaavia, who first made the distinction between Karachi and the rest has mentioned that Karachi accounts for 60% of total tax revenues.

  • So 64 – 60 = 4%. That is what interior Sindh contributes to the national coffers – just 4%.

  • You have stated that Punjab contributes 27%.

  • So 60 + 4 + 27 = 91%. The remaining 9% is obviously contributed by NWFP and Balochistan?

So the overall figures from all the statistics you and others have been claiming are:-

Karachi – 60%
Punjab – 27%
NWFP and Balochistan – 9%
Interior Sindh – 4%

Now provide us with the factual proof that interior Sindh gets less than 4% of all the revenues, and NWFP and Balochistan get less than 9%? Just look at distribution in the NFC award? :)

[quote]
One more thing, please stop trying to separate Karachi from Sindh. I don’t play that game.
[/quote]

That is a bit rich coming from a person who made a separatist-like statement earlier in this thread, namely - Just remember the Bengalis were also accused of being anti-Punjab and anti-Pakistan. Today they at least have control over their own financial resources, rather then having to do with measly handouts from West Pakistan. **It is true what they say about freedom, it is worth dying for.**

FYI, interior Sindh and Karachi have always been differentiated for stastical purposes since the early 1970's, a policy initiated by your very own ZAB.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Malik73: *

As I have shown Punjab only gets twice what it puts in because it has 55% of the national populaton to support. But interior Sindh, NWFP and Balochistan get 3.5 times what they put into the national coffers. It is not Punjab that is getting the best of treatment, and the figures bear that out - but interior Sindh NWFP and Balochistan. Is that what you call fair?
[/QUOTE]

Malik, having more population isnt a justification for Punjab to usurp more than 50 % of resources...look towards our East, we see India and there the distribution of resource is according to poverty and other reasons and population gets 10 % more...although India is more diverse ethnically as compared to Pakistan but now they seem to be more cjoherent because of their good management...and distribition of resources fairly between the provinces...if the resources are kept spending like its being done at the moment, it will only make the richer areas richer and poorer poorer...at the moment if a seccessionist movement appears in Rural Sindh, or Balochistan I dont think we have any justification to stop them from it...because you cant provide me AN example where one province gets more than half of the resources, and the remaining 3 have to settle for less than half...I think we can learn about the good things of Indian system, and see as to how they have implemented their NFC award...

Malik, even I am a Punjabi...but I wont justify every thing that Punjab does because of that...I used to be like you and CM, and used to get quite sentimental on hearing these facts...but later with interaction with people from smaller provinces, especially Punjab and a little bit of thinking I found out that the provinces are right to some extent...right now I feel that its only Punjab that has to has its share reduced, if we want to keep Pakistan intact...if the situation continues the way its going, I am sorry to say I dont see any future for Pakistan...

Well, I am not zaavia and that figure might be true but Karachi is not a separate province and is a city of Sindh. Frankly I don’t know the figures for Karachi as opposed to rest of Sindh, so it would be wrong to assume any figures and calculate on its basis. But if you really like to go that path, maybe you should calculate how much Lahore makes or Punjab and how much it gets back, as opposed to backward areas like South Punjab.

But for our purposes let’s stick to whatever official data we have. Furthermore, I have NO problem if revenue of Karachi is redistributed to help out poor areas of Sindh, Balochistan, Punjab, or NWFP. Already Karachi takes in refugees from around the world and migrants from other provinces and takes relative good care of them despite the problems and I am not complaining. But I want the revenue collected from Karachi to first help the poor in Karachi and then the poor in Sindh. Right now, most of the revenue from Karachi is going to a bloated federal government that has done nothing for Sindh worth talking about. Since the majority of army is from Punjab, why doesn’t Punjab take the majority of the burden in feeding the army? How about changing army spending based on the percentage of people that come from a province? Since you like population based spending so much, whichever province has the most number of soldiers should contribute the most funds to the well being of army. Sounds like a fair plan to me.

But if we assume that rural Sindh does only generate 4% revenue, I still have no way of knowing how much of the 9% Sindh gets back is spent on rural as opposed to urban areas. But if we want to assume I would bet that 6% is spent on urban Sindh, while a measly 3% on rural Sindh which is Rs 12 billion. Certainly not enough for any meaningful development.

And yes freedom is worth dying for. Is that such a wrong statement to make? Is reminding people of learning from not so distant history also a separatist like statement?

I believe in tax redstribution based on full devolution ...

I would like to see the revenues collected in Sindh when you take out the Customs Taxes collected at the port.

I would argue that the port - being the hub of international trade - be classified as federal jurisdiction for the purposes of revenue allocation.

Once that is done, the revenues collected in particular district (go maximum devloution of tac distribution).. majority of taxes should be spent in that district..

i.e. form the taxes collected in Defence, Clifton and Korangi Industrial Area districts of Karachi, major part should be returned to those districts..

that is fair after all... according to the "fairness" meter used by Zaavia and Imdad.

I don't think that these two guys would term this as unfair.. after all these three districts ply in most of the taxes collected within Karachi..

why should these three districts not get their fair due.. why should all the money go to Lines Area or Korangi residential or Shah Faisal Colony etc. even though the they have a higher population percantage of Karachi...

And why doesn't more money go to Lyari or Orangi .. two of the poorest areas of Karachi?

Bollocks to all this crap pointless argument..

I agree that their may be better ways to redistribute the "national wealth" but the figures and percentage in this post are taken out of context and is full of number playing..

Nothing is ever fair in Pakistan... History will never forgive our leaders if they force us into another 1971 situation.

Black Zero: The concept of District Finance Commissions was planned to stop a misuse like you imply.

The basis issue is the federal govt should be intervening and governing only in cases of a total breakdown of basic services. The provincial and District govt should have sufficient resources to givern on their own. but in the case of parts of Southern Punjab, Baluchistan, FATA and Sindh their is not even enough water to drink..and no hopsitals for miles. In fact in Baluchistans case the province receives 12.5% per annum as royalty for Sui gas as a share, in Canada the states receive 40% royalty for Oil and Gas. If it received 40% Baluchistan would probably be the richest province the country. I think that is a big sacrifice for Pakistan and they deserve some acknowledgment( again Musharraf has done well in this regard but mroe needs to be done)

Lastly, here’s what Imran Khan’s tehrik-e-insaf thinks of the issue:
http://www.insaf.org.pk/press/september/press_release_sep16a.htm
http://www.insaf.org.pk/agenda/Agenda9.html

**He said federalism demands that the provinces have adequate financial resources to provide basic services. Babar stated that the NFC award process strikes at the heart of the principle of equity between federating units. Equal social and economic rights for citizens can only be secured if adequate resources are allocated. By basing the entire revenue sharing formula on population alone deprives regions and provinces of their fundamental human rights and condemns them to perpetual grinding poverty and poor quality of life. The present formula ignores factors where the federating units differ widely in terms of per capita income, population density, administrative infrastructure, ability to raise taxes, and fiscal discipline.

He said the PTI recommends that independent economic surveys should be conducted to establish the Gross Province Domestic Product and determine income levels for each province and within provinces. Based on the results of the surveys, greater weightage should be given for resource allocations to bridge the gap between the lowest and highest per capita Gross Province Domestic Product. He said the Federal Share in the net proceeds of divisible pool taxes would be reduced from 62.5 percent to 55 percent, thus increasing the share of the provinces from 37.5 percent to 45 percent. **